Contents | Page |
Strategic report | |
Performance review | |
Managing risk | |
Performance measures | |
Non-financial information statement | |
Our people and culture | |
Climate and sustainability | |
The Enterprise Risk Management Framework defines nine Principal Risks | |||||
Principal Risks | Risks are classified into Principal Risks, as below | How risks are managed | |||
Climate Risk | The impact on Financial and Operational Risks arising from climate change through physical risks, risks associated with transitioning to a lower carbon economy and connected risks arising as a result of second order impacts on portfolios of these two drivers. | The Barclays Group and the Bank assess and manage climate risk across businesses and functions in line with the Barclays Group’s net zero ambition by monitoring exposure to elevated risk sectors, conducting scenario analysis and risk assessments for key portfolios. Climate Risk became a Principal Risk in 2022. Climate risk controls are embedded across the Financial and Operational Principal Risk types through the Barclays Group's Frameworks, Policies and Standards (which apply to the Bank). | |||
Principal Risk | Credit Risk | The risk of loss to the Bank from the failure of clients, customers or counterparties (including sovereigns), to fully honour their obligations to the Bank, including the whole and timely payment of principal, interest, collateral and other receivables. | Credit risk teams identify, evaluate, sanction, limit and monitor various forms of credit exposure, individually and in aggregate. | ||
Market Risk | The risk of loss arising from potential adverse changes in the value of the Bank’s assets and liabilities from fluctuation in market variables including, but not limited to, interest rates, foreign exchange, equity prices, commodity prices, credit spreads, implied volatilities and asset correlations. | A range of complementary approaches to identify and evaluate market risk are used to capture exposure to market risk. These are measured, limited and monitored by market risk specialists. | |||
Treasury and Capital Risk | Liquidity Risk: The risk that the Bank is unable to meet its contractual or contingent obligations or that it does not have the appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets. | Treasury and capital risk is identified and managed by specialists in Capital Planning, Liquidity, Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk. A range of approaches are used appropriate to the risk, such as limits, plan monitoring and stress testing based on real time/timely information from our operations. | |||
Capital Risk: The risk that the Bank has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support its normal business activities and to meet its regulatory capital requirements under normal operating environments and stressed conditions (both actual and as defined for internal planning or regulatory testing purposes). This also includes the risk from the Bank’s defined benefit pension plans. | |||||
Interest Rate Risk in the banking book: The risk that the Bank is exposed to capital or income volatility because of a mismatch between the interest rate exposures of its (non-traded) assets and liabilities. | |||||
Operational Risk | The risk of loss to the Bank from inadequate or failed processes or systems, human factors or due to external events (for example fraud) where the root cause is not due to credit or market risks. | The Bank assesses and manages its operational risk and control environment across its businesses and functions with a view to maintaining an acceptable level of residual risk. | |||
Model Risk | The potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. | Models are evaluated for approval prior to implementation, and on an ongoing basis. | |||
Conduct Risk | The risk of poor outcomes for, or harm to, customers, clients and markets, arising from the delivery of the Bank's products and services. | The Conduct Risk Management Framework (‘CRMF’) sets out the control objectives and minimum control requirements which must be implemented to manage Conduct Risk. A selection of tools is mandated in the CRMF and Barclays Control Framework to support with the assessment of Conduct Risks, whilst the governance of Conduct Risk is fulfilled through management committees and forums with clear escalation and reporting lines to Board-level committees. | |||
Reputation Risk | The risk that an action, transaction, investment, event, decision, or business relationship will reduce trust in the Bank’s integrity and/or competence. | Reputation risk is managed by embedding our purpose and values, and maintaining a controlled culture within the Bank, with the objective of acting with integrity, enabling strong and trusted relationships to be built with customers and clients, colleagues and broader society. Each business assesses reputation risk using standardised tools and the governance is fulfilled through management committees and forums, clear escalation and reporting lines to the BBI Board. | |||
Legal Risk | The risk of loss or imposition of penalties, damages or fines from the failure of the Bank to meet its legal obligations, including regulatory or contractual requirements. | Legal risk is managed by the identification of legal risks by the Legal Function, the engagement of the Legal Function in situations that have the potential for legal risk, and the escalation of legal risk as necessary. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Total income | 1,430 | 1,196 |
Operating expenses | (1,106) | (968) |
Profit before impairment | 324 | 228 |
Credit impairment (charges)/releases | (167) | 97 |
Profit before tax | 157 | 325 |
Tax charge | (57) | (90) |
Profit after tax | 100 | 235 |
Attributable to other equity instrument holders | (48) | (40) |
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders | 52 | 195 |
Cost: income ratioa | 77% | 81% |
No. of employees at 31 December (full time equivalent) | 1,776 | 1,708 |
Balance Sheet information: | €bn | €bn |
Assets | ||
Cash and balances at central banks | 30.5 | 24.1 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 18.5 | 17.7 |
Loans and advances to customers | 13.9 | 13.1 |
Trading portfolio assets | 7.7 | 8.2 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 17.2 | 15.4 |
Derivative financial instruments | 40.4 | 33.9 |
Total assets | 132.5 | 117.1 |
Liabilities | ||
Deposits from customers | 25.8 | 21.4 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 24.7 | 17.1 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | 12.9 | 10.3 |
Subordinated liabilities | 4.7 | 3.2 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 14.9 | 13.8 |
Derivative financial instrument | 32.5 | 33.5 |
Total equity | 6.5 | 5.9 |
Credit quality: | ||
% of loans and advances to customers impairedb (%) | 4.2% | 4.6% |
Expected Credit Loss (‘ECL’) coverage on loans and advances to customersc (%) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
ECL coverage on impaired loans and advances to customersd (%) | 43% | 40% |
Capital and liquiditye: | ||
Risk weighted assetsf (€bn) | 35.2 | 32.1 |
Common equity tier 1 (‘CET1’) (transitional)g,h (€bn) | 5.9 | 5.2 |
CET1 (transitional)h, i (%) | 16.7% | 16.1% |
Total regulatory capital (transitional)h,i (%) | 22.4% | 21.4% |
Liquidity poolj (€bn) | 30.7 | 25.4 |
Liquidity coverage ratio (‘LCR’)k (%) | 194% | 171% |
Net stable funding ratio (‘NSFR’) (%) | 149% | 148% |
Loan to Deposit ratiol | 54% | 61% |
Directors | Appointed/Resigned | Nationality | Position |
Tim Breedon CBE (1),(4) | British | Board Chair and Chair of Board Nominations Committee | |
Etienne Boris (1), (2), (3), (4) | French | Board Audit Committee Chair | |
Thomas Huertas (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) | American | Board Risk Committee Chair | |
Eoin O’Driscoll (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) | Irish | Board Remuneration Committee Chair | |
Jennifer Allerton (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) | British | ||
Francesco Ceccato (6) | Italian | Chief Executive Officer | |
Jasper Hanebuth (6) | German | Chief Financial Officer | |
Joanna Nader (1), (3), (4) | Appointed 22 August 2022 | British/ Canadian |
Tim Breedon CBE | Francesco Ceccato | Jasper Hanebuth |
Chair | Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
15 March 2023 |
Environmental statementsa | ||
Statement or policy position | Description | Information to help understand the Bank, and its impact, policies, due diligence and outcomes |
Climate Change statement | The Barclays Position on Climate Change sets out our approach, based on a consideration of all risk and market factors, to certain energy sectors with higher carbon-related exposures or emissions from extraction or consumption, or those which may have an impact in certain sensitive environments or on communities, namely thermal coal mining, coal-fired power generation, mountain top coal removal, oil sands, Arctic oil and gas, and hydraulic fracturing (‘fracking’). The statement outlines the Barclays Group’s focus on supporting its clients to transition to a low-carbon economy, while helping to limit the threat that climate change poses to people and to the natural environment. | See our ‘Climate and Sustainability’ section from page 21 to 30 |
Forestry and Agricultural Commodities statement | See the ‘Managing impacts in lending and financing’ section on pages 21 to 22 within ‘Climate and Sustainability’ section | |
World Heritage Site and Ramsar Wetlands statement | The Barclays Group understands that certain industries can impact areas of high biodiversity value including United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (‘UNESCO’) World Heritage Sites (‘WHS’) and Ramsar Wetlands (‘RW’). The Barclays Group’s WHS and RW statement outlines the Barclays Group’s client due diligence approach to preserving and safeguarding these sites. | See our ‘Nature and biodiversity’ section on pages 22 to 23 within our ‘Climate and Sustainability’ section |
Environmental risk in lending | The Barclays Group is committed to managing the direct and indirect environmental risks associated with commercial lending. Environmental risk is regarded as a credit risk driver, and is considered in the Barclays credit risk assessment process through the Barclays Group Environmental Risk Standard. A dedicated Environmental and Climate Risk team at Barclays Group level is responsible for advising on environmental and climate-related credit risks to Barclays associated with particular transactions and industries. Environmental risks in credit are governed under the Client Assessment and Aggregation Policy and Standard which are embedded within the Wholesale Credit Risk Control Framework, which is part of the Enterprise Risk Management Framework. | See our Climate risk section on page 46 |
Climate Change, Financial Risk and Operational Risk Policy | The Climate Change Financial Risk and Operational Risk Policy outlines the requirements and policy objectives for assessing and managing the impact on Financial and Operational Risks arising from the physical, transition and connected risks associated with climate change. This incorporates identification, measurement, management and reporting. Financial and Operational Risks / Themes associated with Climate Change are being managed in accordance with the requirements set out in this policy. | See our Climate risk section on page 46 |
Colleagues | ||
Statement or policy position | Description | Information to help understand the Bank, and its impact, policies, due diligence and outcomes |
Board Diversity Policy | The Barclays Group Board Diversity Policy confirms that the Board Nominations Committee will consider candidates on merit against objective criteria and with due regard to the benefits of diversity in identifying suitable candidates for appointment to the Board. | See detail on ‘Our people and culture’ on page 19 |
Code of Conduct | The Barclays Way is our code of conduct and outlines the Purpose, Values and Mindset which govern our way of working across our business globally. It constitutes a reference point covering all aspects of colleagues’ working relationships, and provides guidance on working with colleagues, customers and clients, governments and regulators, business partners, suppliers, competitors and the broader community | N/A |
Measures of Success | The Bank uses a variety of tools to track and measure its strategic delivery, and collects both quantitative and qualitative information to develop the full picture of its performance. | See detail on ‘Our people and culture’ on page 19 |
Social matters | ||
Statement or policy position | Description | Information to help understand the Bank, and its impact, policies, due diligence and outcomes |
Donations | The Barclays Group works in partnership with non-profit organisations, including charities and non-governmental organisations, to develop high-performing programmes and volunteering opportunities that harness the skills and passion of our employees. The Barclays Group has chosen to partner with a small number of organisations, allowing us to have deeper relationships and ultimately enabling us to have the greatest impact on our communities in which we operate. The Barclays Group does not accept unsolicited donation requests. | • home.barclays/ content/dam/homebarclays/ documents/ citizenship/ourreporting-and- policypositions/ Barclaysdonationguidelines.pd f |
Tax | The Barclays Group’s Tax Principles are central to the Bank’s approach to tax planning, for ourselves or on behalf of our clients. Since their introduction in 2013, we believe the Barclays Group’s Tax Principles have been a strong addition to the way we manage tax, ensuring that we take into account all of our stakeholders when making decisions related to our tax affairs. The same applies to the Barclays Group’s Tax Code of Conduct. | N/A |
Sanctions | Sanctions are restrictions on activity with targeted countries, governments, entities, individuals and industries that are imposed by bodies such as the United Nations (‘UN’), the EU, individual countries or groups of countries. The Barclays Group Sanctions Policy is designed to ensure that the Bank and the Barclays Group comply with applicable sanctions laws in every jurisdiction in which they operate. | N/A |
Defence sector | The Barclays Group Statement on the Defence Sector outlines the Barclays Group’s appetite for defence-related transactions and relationships. The Barclays Group provides financial services to the defence sector within a specific policy framework. Transactions and relationships are assessed on a case-by-case basis and legal compliance alone does not automatically guarantee our support. | N/A |
Human rights | ||
Statement or policy position | Description | Information to help understand the Bank, and its impact, policies, due diligence and outcomes |
Human rights | The Barclays Group is committed to operating in accordance with the International Bill of Human Rights and takes account of other internationally accepted human rights standards, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We take steps to ensure we are respecting human rights in our operations through our employment policies and practices, in our supply chain through screening and engagement, and through the responsible provision of our products and services. | See the ‘Managing impacts in lending and financing’ section on pages 21 to 22 within the ‘Climate and Sustainability’ section |
Modern slavery | The Barclays Group recognises its responsibility to comply with all relevant legislation including the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015. In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Barclays Group releases an annual Statement on Modern Slavery, which outlines the actions the Barclays Group has taken in seeking to identify and address the risks of modern slavery and human trafficking in our operations, supply chain, and customer and client relationships. | Further details on our Barclays Group Statement on Modern Slavery can be found at: home.barclays/sustainability/ esg-resource-hub/ reporting- and-disclosures/ |
Third-party code of conduct | Our approach to the way we do business needs to be adopted by our suppliers when acting on behalf of the Barclays Group. To ensure a common understanding of our approach which will help us collectively drive the highest standards of conduct, we have created our Third Party Code of Conduct, which details our expectations for Environmental Management, Human Rights, Diversity and Inclusion; and living the Barclays Values. | N/A |
Data protection | Across the Barclays Group, the privacy and security of personal information is respected and protected. The Barclays Group Privacy website page governs how we collect, handle, store, share, use and dispose of information about people. We regard sound privacy practices as a key element of corporate governance and accountability. | N/A |
Anti-bribery and anti-corruption | ||
Statement or policy position | Description | Information to help understand our Group and its impact, policies, due diligence and outcomes |
Bribery and corruption | The Barclays Group recognises that corruption can undermine the rule of law, democratic processes and basic human freedoms, impoverishing states and distorting free trade and competition. The Barclays Group policy statement reflects the statutory requirements applicable to the Barclays Group as derived from the EU-level legislation on combating public and private sector corruption as well as the UN and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development conventions on corruption. | N/A |
Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing | The Barclays Group’s Financial Crime Policy is designed to ensure that we comply with UK, EU, and other applicable laws and regulations concerning anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, and it takes into account guidance issued by bodies such as the Wolfsberg Group and the European Banking Authority. The Financial Crime Policy is also designed to ensure that all our businesses and legal entities have adequate systems and controls in place to mitigate the risk of the Barclays Group being used to facilitate money laundering and other forms of financial crime. | N/A |
2022 | 2021 | |
Females at Managing Director and Director level (%) | 26% | 25% |
Colleague engagement (%)a | 76% | 73% |
“it’s safe to speak up” (%) | 78% | 74% |
“I would recommend Barclays to people I know as a great place to work” (%)a | 77% | 74% |
Case study: Barclays nature-linked financing - Cairn Homes plc Biodiversity Linked SLL Barclays Corporate Banking Sustainable Product Group provided support to Cairn Homes plc (Cairn) in the selection of meaningful targets and indicators linked to certain sustainability performance targets. In July 2022, Cairn completed a refinancing of its €277.5m syndicate facility into a sustainability linked term loan (‘SLL’) and revolving credit facility (‘RCF’), one of the largest of its type arranged in the Irish homebuilding sector, with AIB, Bank of Ireland and BBI. The term loan and RCF interest rates are linked to Cairn meeting certain sustainability performance targets on biodiversity, decarbonisation and its people strategy. From a biodiversity perspective, the annual targets include a commitment to increase biodiversity net gain (‘BNG’) across Cairn’s new developments measured as a percentage of overall new homes commenced. BNG delivers measurable improvements for ecology by protecting, enhancing and creating habitats in association with development and Cairn's approach includes a development-specific biodiversity programme that replaces or improves the local biodiversity of each new Cairn development or otherwise contributes to the improvement of Ireland’s biodiversity. |
TNFD pilot with UNEP-FI - European Agriculture and Food In 2022, the TNFD published a draft version of its risk management and disclosure framework for organisations to report and act on evolving nature-related risks. UNEP-FI is piloting this framework with approximately 40 financial institutions - Barclays is participating in their pilot group focused on European agriculture and fisheries, which in the Barclays context means agriculture and food sectors. As part of the pilot programme, we worked with an external expert to test the draft TNFD framework, including the proposed risk assessment process (‘LEAP FI’), on our agriculture and food portfolio in Europe and the UK. This activity was led by the Barclays Group, but included the Bank’s clients. This involved assessing our clients’ locations in terms of production and sales and applying a number of biodiversity metrics to each location to determine where key impacts and risks may arise. A number of different 2030 scenarios were also used to stress the portfolio and individual counterparties, to see whether material financial impact could arise as a result of nature-related transition and physical risks. The results are currently being reviewed internally to assess how they could be used alongside existing climate risk procedures. |
As at 31 December 2022 | KPIs | Description |
Taxonomy eligible activities as a proportion of total covered assetse | 5.3% | Economic activities with undertakings subject to NFRD, households and local governments that have been assessed as eligible in line with the Regulation, as a percentage of total covered assets. |
Taxonomy non-eligible activities as a proportion of total covered assets | 27.2% | Economic activities with undertakings subject to NFRD, households and local governments that have been assessed as non-eligible in line with the Regulation, as a percentage of total covered assets. |
Exposures to undertakings in scope of NFRD as a proportion of total covered assets | 32.5% | Covered assets that are exposures to entities subject to NFRD, as a percentage of total covered assets. |
Exposures to undertakings out of scope of NFRD as a proportion of total covered assetsf | 67.5% | Covered assets that are exposures to entities not subject to NFRD, as a percentage of total covered assets. Exposures that are not in scope of total covered assets are not included in this KPI. |
100% | ||
Derivatives as a proportion of total covered assets | 45.1% | Derivative financial instrument assets as a percentage of total covered assets. Derivative financial instrument assets are part of total covered assets, but out of scope for eligibility in line with the Regulation. |
Exposures to central banks, central governments and supranationals issuers as a proportion of total covered assets | 39.1% | Exposures to central banks, central governments and supranationals issuers, as a percentage of total covered assets. Selected regional and state governments are treated as central governments in line with the European Banking Authority (‘EBA’) listg of regional governments, local authorities and public sector entities that may be treated as central governments. |
Trading book as a proportion of total covered assets | 8.6% | Trading book exposures as a percentage of total covered assets. Trading book assets comprises debt and equity securities and traded loans reported on the balance sheet as trading portfolio assets, and excludes reverse repurchase agreements at fair value separately reported on the balance sheet. |
On demand interbank loans as a proportion of total covered assets | 1.5% | Exposures to on-demand interbank loans, as a percentage of total covered assets. |
Total covered assetsh | €89,712m | Total covered assets are defined by the EU Taxonomy FAQs as total on-balance sheet assets minus those assets excluded from the calculation of the GAR. Therefore, total assets as defined under IFRS as adopted by the EU, minus trading portfolio assets and exposures to central banks, central governments and supranationals issuers. Total covered assets of €89,712m represents 67.7% of total assets. |
Nuclear energy and fossil gas related disclosures | ||
Nuclear energy related activities | ||
1 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle. | YES |
2 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies. | YES |
3 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades. | YES |
Fossil gas related activities | ||
4 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels. | YES |
5 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/ cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels. | YES |
6 | The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels. | YES |
Taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activitiesg | |||||||
Economic activities | Amount and proportion of total covered assets | ||||||
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible economic activity identified in the denominator of the applicable KPI: | CCM+CCA | Climate change mitigation (CCM)h | Climate change adaptation (CCA)h | ||||
€m | % | €m | % | €m | % | ||
1 | Research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle (a) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | Construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat using best-available technologies (b) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3 | Modification of existing nuclear installations (c) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
4 | Construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels (d) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
5 | Construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels (e) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
6 | Construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels connected to efficient district heating and cooling (f) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI | 4,763 | 5.3 | 4,763 | 5.3 | — | — |
8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI | 4,763 | 5.3 | 4,763 | 5.3 | — | — |
Taxonomy non-eligible economic activities | |||
Economic activities | Amount and proportion of total covered assets | ||
Amount and proportion of economic activity identified in the denominator of the applicable KPI: | €m | % | |
1 | Research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle (a) | — | — |
2 | Construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat using best-available technologies (b) | — | — |
3 | Modification of existing nuclear installations (c) | — | — |
4 | Construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels (d) | — | — |
5 | Construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels (e) | — | — |
6 | Construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels connected to efficient district heating and cooling (f) | — | — |
7 | Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-non-eligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI | 24,425 | 27.2 |
8 | Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-non-eligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI | 24,425 | 27.2 |
Contents | Page | |
▪Climate risk | ||
▪Liquidity risk | ||
▪Capital risk | ||
▪Interest rate risk in the banking book | ||
▪Climate risk management | ||
▪Climate risk performance | ||
▪Credit risk performance | ||
▪Market risk performance | ||
▪Treasury and capital risk performance | ||
▪Operational risk performance | ||
▪Supervision of the Bank | ||
▪Supervision in the EU | ||
▪Financial regulatory framework |
Climate risk management The impact on Financial and Operational Risks arising from climate change through physical risks, risks associated with transitioning to a lower carbon economy and connected risks arising as a result of second order impacts of these two drivers on portfolios. |
Physical risks | Acute | Chronic |
Example drivers | • Damage to fixed assets and infrastructure (property, power supplies) by climate events such as wildfires • Adverse impact on agriculture and production of soft commodities due to drought • Transport difficulties and damage to infrastructure due to severe storm and flooding | • Change in weather and precipitation patterns, resulting in reduced agricultural yields and land no longer suitable for farming • Potential population migration due to inhabitable land • Increase in sea levels and consequent coastal erosion, requiring building of new seawall and flood defences • Rising temperatures resulting in diminished productivity and health issues |
Potential impacts – examples | • Increased costs due to damage to facilities • Reduced revenue from decreased production capacity • Increased operating costs and decrease in sales due to unavailability of raw materials and supply chain disruptions | • Reduced revenue from decreased production capacity and early retirement of assets • Decrease in property values • Increased costs and insurance for assets in high risk locations • Reduced revenue from lower sales and output |
Expected time horizon | Sa, M, L | M, L |
Classification | Event-driven | Structural |
Primary risks impacted | Credit Risk, Market Risk, Treasury and Capital Risk, Operational Risk, Reputational Risk | |
Secondary risks impacted | Conduct Risk, Legal Risk |
Transition risk | Policy and Regulatory | Legal | Technology | Market |
Example drivers | • Carbon tax impacting sectors and clients • Tightening of emissions and energy efficiency standards • Imposing an absolute cap on GHG emissions at manufacturing sites • Enhanced GHG reporting obligations | • Government and non- governmental organisations taking litigation actions • Imposing legal liabilities on firms for their contribution to physical impacts of climate change | • Disruptive substitute technologies being favoured because of lower carbon footprint • Development of emissions capture and recycling facilities • Investments in new technologies • Alternatives to fossil fuel | • Shift in consumer preferences • Changes in supply and demand of raw materials • Shareholder perceptions and consumer pressures • Changing market sentiment |
Potential impacts – examples | • Increased operating cost for compliance • Increased capital expenditure to meet regulatory standards • Operating constraints • Write-offs and early retirement of assets | • Increased costs due to fines and penalties from class action damages • Changes in the valuation of assets • Decreased demand for products and services | • Impairment of assets and early retirement of assets • Research and development expenditure in new technologies • Costs for adoption of new practices and processes | • Increased costs and reduced demand for products and services • Increased production costs due to changing input prices and output requirements • Decreased revenue and repricing of assets |
Expected time horizon | Sa, M, L | Sa, M, L | Sa, M, L | Sa, M, L |
Classification | Event-driven, Structural | Event-driven, Structural | Structural | Structural |
Primary risks impacted | Credit Risk, Market Risk, Treasury and Capital Risk, Operational Risk, Reputational Risk | |||
Secondary risks impacted | Conduct Risk, Legal Risk |
Enterprise Risk Management Framework (‘ERMF’) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate Risk Framework | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate Change Financial Risk and Operational Risk Policy | Climate Change Standard | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate Risk | Credit Risk | Market Risk | Treasury and Capital Risk | Operational Risk | Reputation Risk | |||||||||||||||||||
Respons ibilities | Provide climate horizon scanning information and emerging trends to BRC and Principal Risk Leads Recommend risk appetite statement, constraints and exclusions to BRC Define areas of concern and recommend scenario analysis priorities Lead the development of climate-specific risk methodologies Interpret stress test results for relevance as drivers of risk Review and challenge risk type approaches and support consistency across risk types Aggregate and monitor a central climate risk view across in scope risk types | Monitor portfolio level exposure to the physical and transition risks of climate change Review individual obligors’ exposure to climate risk via the Climate Lens questionnaire Assess climate risk within Sovereign Credit Risk reviews Include material exposures to climate risk within the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (‘ICAAP’) Oversight by Legal Entity Climate Risk Forums and relevant Risk Management Committees as appropriate, including regular climate risk reporting up to Board Risk Committee level | Identify and Assess climate-related risk factors Apply stress scenarios, assess stress losses and set risk limits Oversight by Market Risk Committee and Board Risk Committee | Identify exposure to climate risk Consider key risk indicators and limits to support risk management Include in ICAAP and Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (‘ILAAP’) Oversight by Treasury & Capital Risk Committee and Board Risk Committee | Integrate climate change across different risk categories, e.g. Operational Recovery Planning and Premises Include climate change within risk assessment processes including Strategic Risk Assessment | Outline minimum requirements and controls for Reputation Risk management relating to client relationships or transactions Outline the expected business behaviours in relation to these issues Outline the approach to enhanced due diligence. | ||||||||||||||||||
Owners hip | Climate Risk Accountable Officer | Credit Risk Accountable Officer | Market Risk Accountable Officer | Treasury & Capital Risk Accountable Officer | Operational Risk Accountable Officer | Group Head of Sustainability |
Climate-related Risk Management Processes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Risk | Market Risk | Treasury and Capital Risk | Operational Risk | |||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency of assessment | Various | Quarterly | Various (quarterly for IRRBB and liquidity risk; annually for capital risk) | Annually | ||||||||||||||||||||
Risk identification | Wholesale exposure identified as part of sovereign, portfolio and obligor credit annual reviews. | Identified by assessing climate-related risk factors across asset classes, sectors and geographies, and aggregating market risk exposures from climate-related risks. | Identified through risk assessment activity across certain industries and asset classes to analyse and assess exposures which may be impacted by climate-related risks. | Confirmed operational risks associated with climate change are included in the Bank’s Operational Risk Taxonomy. Climate risks are included within the Strategic Risk Assessment process. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Risk assessment | Portfolios are monitored through regular reporting of climate metrics and are assessed against mandates and limits where appropriate Clients in elevated risk sectors above a threshold exposure will have their credit risk exposure to Climate Risk qualitatively assessed through the Credit Climate Lens questionnaire. Future exposure to Climate Risk as a driver to Credit Risk is quantified through scenario analysis and stress testing exercises. In addition to the Credit Climate Lens questionnaire, Sovereign Credit Reviews are also carried out for Sovereigns above a threshold exposure to assess their susceptibility to Climate risks. | Measured by using adverse multi-asset stress scenarios applied to individual risk factors reflecting climate change risks across sectors, countries and regions. | Measured as part of stress testing and key risk indicator monitoring | Establishing reporting on internal and external climate-related risk events at Group’s Climate Risk Control Forum. Risk tolerances for premises and resilience risks are reviewed so these adequately capture climate-related risk drivers. |
Credit risk management (audited) The risk of loss to the Bank from the failure of clients, customers or counterparties, including sovereigns, to fully honour their obligations to the Bank, including the whole and timely payment of principal, interest, collateral and other receivables. |
Market risk management The risk of loss arising from potential adverse changes in the value of the Bank’s assets and liabilities from fluctuation in market variables including, but not limited to, interest rates, foreign exchange, credit spreads, implied volatilities and asset correlations. |
Treasury and capital risk management This comprises: Liquidity risk: The risk that the Bank is unable to meet its contractual or contingent obligations or that it does not have the appropriate amount, tenor and composition of funding and liquidity to support its assets. Capital risk: The risk that the Bank has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support its normal business activities and to meet its regulatory capital requirements under normal operating environments and stressed conditions (both actual and as defined for internal planning or regulatory testing purposes). This also includes the risk from the Bank’s defined benefit pension plans. Interest rate risk in the banking book: The risk that the Bank is exposed to capital or income volatility because of a mismatch between the interest rate exposures of its (non-traded) assets and liabilities. |
Operational risk management The risk of loss to Bank from inadequate or failed processes or systems, human factors or due to external events (for example fraud) where the root cause is not due to credit or market risks. |
Model risk management The potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs and reports. |
Conduct risk management The risk of poor outcomes for, or harm to, customers, clients and markets, arising from the delivery of the Bank’s products and services. |
Reputation risk management The risk that an action, transaction, investment, event, decision, or business relationship will reduce trust in the Bank’s integrity and/or competence. |
Legal risk management The risk of loss or imposition of penalties, damages or fines from the failure of the Bank to meet its legal obligations, including regulatory or contractual requirements. |
Elevated risk sector | Drivers of risk |
Aviation | More stringent air emission and carbon regulations, requiring high levels of capital investment and Research & Development (R&D) expenditure. |
Automotive | Policy pressure to cut emissions to meet emission requirements, requiring high levels of capital investment and R&D expenditure. Phase out of fossil fuel vehicles and introduction of low emission zones in city centres. |
Cement | Being one of the hard to abate sectors, policy pressure to cut emissions requires high levels of capital investment and R&D expenditure. |
Coal Mining and Coal Terminals | Reduction in demand of thermal coal, as utilities transition away from fossil fuel. More stringent air emissions regulation, resulting in higher levels of capital investment. |
Chemicals | Increasing environmental regulation, including carbon regulations. The increasing efforts to eliminate single-use plastics and improve recycling to prevent marine pollution could also impact demand for products used in plastic manufacture. |
Mining (including diversified miners) | Rising costs as a result of tighter environmental regulations and increasing water stress. |
Oil and Gas | Policy pressure to cut emissions, exposure to carbon taxes and overall increasing environmental regulation of operations and restrictions on access to new resources. Over time, falling demand for fossil fuels |
Power Utilities | Policy pressure to cut emissions, leading to increased capital expenditure costs, plus potential exposure to carbon taxes. |
Agriculture | Evolving taxation on emissions may impact production methods, supply chain and farm viability. Reduced demand for meat and dairy as a consequence of shifts in consumer behaviour. Volatile weather conditions and extreme weather events may impact farm credit quality. |
Shipping | Policy pressure to cut emissions, requiring higher levels of capital investment. |
Steel | Being an energy-intensive sector, the sector is exposed to the policy pressure to cut emissions and evolving air pollution regulation |
Road Haulage | Policy pressure to cut emissions, requiring high levels of capital investment. |
Carbon-related assets (Incl. sub-sector breakdown) | |||||||
2022 €m | 2021 €m | % Change | |||||
Loans & advances | Loan commitments | Total | Loans & advances | Loan commitments | Total | ||
Agriculture, Food and Forest Products | 210 | 1,006 | 1,216 | 226 | 1,064 | 1,290 | (6%) |
Agriculture | — | 75 | 75 | — | 77 | 77 | |
Food, Bev and Tobacco | 202 | 827 | 1,029 | 222 | 841 | 1,063 | |
Paper and Forest Products | 8 | 104 | 112 | 4 | 146 | 150 | |
Energy | 331 | 7,081 | 7,412 | 1,024 | 3,966 | 4,990 | 49% |
Coal Mining and Coal Terminals | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Oil and Gas | 157 | 2,544 | 2,701 | 605 | 1,409 | 2,014 | |
Power Utilities | 174 | 4,537 | 4,711 | 419 | 2,557 | 2,976 | |
Materials and Building | 786 | 5,256 | 6,042 | 510 | 4,747 | 5,256 | 15% |
Cement | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 152 | 153 | |
Chemicals | 100 | 1,283 | 1,383 | 74 | 1,126 | 1,200 | |
Construction and Materials | 118 | 643 | 761 | 102 | 772 | 874 | |
Homebuilding and Property Development | 27 | 68 | 95 | 46 | 101 | 147 | |
Manufacturing | 205 | 2,495 | 2,700 | 141 | 1,868 | 2,009 | |
Metals | 48 | 30 | 78 | 14 | — | 14 | |
Mining (Incl. diversified miners) | 22 | 64 | 86 | 1 | 19 | 20 | |
5 | 39 | 44 | — | 45 | 45 | ||
Real Estate Management and Development | 261 | 632 | 893 | 131 | 663 | 794 | |
Steel | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Transport | 295 | 2,704 | 2,999 | 235 | 2,459 | 2,694 | 11% |
Automotive | 106 | 1,959 | 2,065 | 14 | 1,808 | 1,822 | |
Aviation | 107 | 284 | 391 | 111 | 223 | 334 | |
Other Transport Services | 81 | 377 | 458 | 110 | 343 | 453 | |
Ports | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Road Haulage | 1 | 84 | 85 | — | 85 | 85 | |
Shipping | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Subtotal (Elevated risk sectors) | 667 | 10,832 | 11,499 | 1,225 | 7,456 | 8,681 | 32% |
Carbon-related Assets Grand Total | 1,622 | 16,047 | 17,669 | 1,995 | 12,235 | 14,230 | 24% |
Total Loans & Advances & Loan Commitments | 15,360 | 32,460 | 47,820 | 13,986 | 27,425 | 41,411 | 15% |
Carbon-related assets / Total Loans & Advances & Loan Commitments | 11% | 49% | 37% | 14% | 45% | 34% |
Maximum exposure and effects of netting, collateral and risk transfer (audited) | ||||||
Maximum exposure | Netting and set-off | Cash collateral | Non-cash collateral | Risk transfer | Net exposure | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m |
On-balance sheet: | ||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 30,540 | — | — | — | — | 30,540 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 18,540 | — | — | — | — | 18,540 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost: | ||||||
Home loans | 4,405 | — | — | (4,402) | — | 3 |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 4,700 | — | (83) | (134) | (9) | 4,474 |
Wholesale loans | 4,843 | — | — | (662) | (2,141) | 2,040 |
Loans and advances to customers | 13,948 | — | (83) | (5,198) | (2,150) | 6,517 |
Loans and advances to banks | 1,412 | — | — | — | — | 1,412 |
Total loans and advances at amortised cost | 15,360 | — | (83) | (5,198) | (2,150) | 7,929 |
Of which credit-impaired (Stage 3): | ||||||
Home loans | 144 | — | — | (144) | — | — |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 82 | — | — | (43) | — | 39 |
Wholesale loans | 120 | — | — | (1) | (79) | 40 |
Total credit impaired loans and advances at amortised cost | 346 | — | — | (188) | (79) | 79 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 1,764 | — | — | (1,764) | — | — |
Trading portfolio assets: | ||||||
Debt securities | 7,307 | — | — | — | — | 7,307 |
Traded loans | 255 | — | — | — | (54) | 201 |
Total trading portfolio assets | 7,562 | — | — | — | (54) | 7,508 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement: | ||||||
Loans and advances | 1,767 | — | — | (323) | — | 1,444 |
Debt securities | 24 | — | — | — | — | 24 |
Reverse repurchase agreements | 15,423 | — | (887) | (14,536) | — | — |
Total financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 17,214 | — | (887) | (14,859) | — | 1,468 |
Derivative financial instruments | 40,439 | (23,787) | (12,797) | (1,651) | (1,496) | 708 |
Other assets | 377 | — | — | — | — | 377 |
Total on-balance sheet | 131,796 | (23,787) | (13,767) | (23,472) | (3,700) | 67,070 |
Off-balance sheet: | ||||||
Contingent liabilities and Financial Guarantees | 4,771 | — | (113) | (7) | (610) | 4,041 |
Loan commitments | 32,460 | — | (19) | (288) | (7,332) | 24,821 |
Total off-balance sheet | 37,231 | — | (132) | (295) | (7,942) | 28,862 |
Total | 169,027 | (23,787) | (13,899) | (23,767) | (11,642) | 95,932 |
Maximum exposure and effects of netting, collateral and risk transfer (audited) | ||||||
Maximum exposure | Netting and set-off | Cash collateral | Non-cash collateral | Risk transfer | Net exposure | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m |
On-balance sheet: | ||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 24,125 | — | — | — | — | 24,125 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 17,651 | — | — | — | — | 17,651 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost: | ||||||
Home loans | 4,951 | — | — | (4,941) | — | 10 |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 4,154 | — | (45) | (133) | (25) | 3,951 |
Wholesale loans | 3,978 | — | — | (288) | (1,105) | 2,585 |
Loans and advances to customers | 13,083 | — | (45) | (5,362) | (1,130) | 6,546 |
Loans and advances to banks | 903 | — | — | — | — | 903 |
Total loans and advances at amortised cost | 13,986 | — | (45) | (5,362) | (1,130) | 7,449 |
Of which credit-impaired (Stage 3): | ||||||
Home loans | 155 | — | — | (155) | — | — |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 120 | — | — | (63) | — | 57 |
Wholesale loans | 97 | — | — | (3) | — | 94 |
Total credit impaired loans and advances at amortised cost | 372 | — | — | (221) | — | 151 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 3,228 | — | — | (3,228) | — | — |
Trading portfolio assets: | ||||||
Debt securities | 7,423 | — | — | — | — | 7,423 |
Traded loans | 638 | — | — | — | — | 638 |
Total trading portfolio assets | 8,061 | — | — | — | — | 8,061 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement: | ||||||
Loans and advances | 726 | — | — | (333) | — | 393 |
Debt securities | 24 | — | — | — | — | 24 |
Reverse repurchase agreements | 14,601 | — | (149) | (14,452) | — | — |
Total financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 15,351 | — | (149) | (14,785) | — | 417 |
Derivative financial instruments | 33,875 | (21,928) | (9,666) | (699) | (93) | 1,489 |
Other assets | 181 | — | — | — | — | 181 |
Total on-balance sheet | 116,458 | (21,928) | (9,860) | (24,074) | (1,223) | 59,373 |
Off-balance sheet: | ||||||
Contingent liabilities | 4,059 | — | — | (5) | (393) | 3,661 |
Loan commitments | 27,425 | — | (1) | (215) | (7,861) | 19,348 |
Total off-balance sheet | 31,484 | — | (1) | (220) | (8,254) | 23,009 |
Total | 147,942 | (21,928) | (9,861) | (24,294) | (9,477) | 82,382 |
Impairment allowance (audited) | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m |
On loans and advances at amortised cost | 541 | 450 |
On loan commitments and financial guarantees | 46 | 27 |
Total impairment allowance | 587 | 477 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost by product (audited) | |||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Stage 2 | ||||||
Stage 1 | Not past due | <=30 days past due | >30 days past due | Total | Stage 3 | Total | |
Gross exposure | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m |
Home loans | 4,025 | 247 | 11 | 7 | 265 | 190 | 4,480 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 3,644 | 1,095 | 42 | 37 | 1,174 | 261 | 5,079 |
Wholesale loans | 4,032 | 711 | 27 | — | 738 | 158 | 4,928 |
Loans and advances to customers | 11,701 | 2,053 | 80 | 44 | 2,177 | 609 | 14,487 |
Loans and advances to banks | 1,394 | 18 | — | — | 18 | 2 | 1,414 |
Totala | 13,095 | 2,071 | 80 | 44 | 2,195 | 611 | 15,901 |
Impairment allowance | |||||||
Home loans | 3 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 46 | 75 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 41 | 139 | 8 | 12 | 159 | 179 | 379 |
Wholesale loans | 22 | 25 | — | — | 25 | 38 | 85 |
Loans and advances to customers | 66 | 187 | 10 | 13 | 210 | 263 | 539 |
Loans and advances to banks | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 |
Totala | 66 | 187 | 10 | 13 | 210 | 265 | 541 |
Net exposure | |||||||
Home loans | 4,022 | 224 | 9 | 6 | 239 | 144 | 4,405 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 3,603 | 956 | 34 | 25 | 1,015 | 82 | 4,700 |
Wholesale loans | 4,010 | 686 | 27 | — | 713 | 120 | 4,843 |
Loans and advances to customers | 11,635 | 1,866 | 70 | 31 | 1,967 | 346 | 13,948 |
Loans and advances to banks | 1,394 | 18 | — | — | 18 | — | 1,412 |
Totala | 13,029 | 1,884 | 70 | 31 | 1,985 | 346 | 15,360 |
Coverage ratio | % | % | % | % | % | % | % |
Home loans | 0.1 | 9.3 | 18.2 | 14.3 | 9.8 | 24.2 | 1.7 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 1.1 | 12.7 | 19.0 | 32.4 | 13.5 | 68.6 | 7.5 |
Wholesale loans | 0.5 | 3.5 | — | — | 3.4 | 24.1 | 1.7 |
Loans and advances to customers | 0.6 | 9.1 | 12.5 | 29.5 | 9.6 | 43.2 | 3.7 |
Loans and advances to banks | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 0.1 |
Totala | 0.5 | 9.0 | 12.5 | 29.5 | 9.6 | 43.4 | 3.4 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost by product (audited) | |||||||
Stage 2 | |||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Stage 1 | Not past due | <=30 days past due | >30 days past due | Total | Stage 3 | Total |
Gross exposure | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m | €'m |
Home loans | 4,355 | 473 | 7 | 5 | 485 | 196 | 5,036 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 3,440 | 682 | 25 | 28 | 735 | 288 | 4,463 |
Wholesale loans | 3,214 | 383 | 10 | 293 | 686 | 134 | 4,034 |
Loans and advances to customers | 11,009 | 1,538 | 42 | 326 | 1,906 | 618 | 13,533 |
Loans and advances to banks | 895 | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | 903 |
Totala | 11,904 | 1,546 | 42 | 326 | 1,914 | 618 | 14,436 |
Impairment allowance | |||||||
Home loans | 3 | 38 | 2 | 1 | 41 | 41 | 85 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 27 | 100 | 5 | 9 | 114 | 168 | 309 |
Wholesale loans | 4 | 14 | — | 1 | 15 | 37 | 56 |
Loans and advances to customers | 34 | 152 | 7 | 11 | 170 | 246 | 450 |
Loans and advances to banks | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Totala | 34 | 152 | 7 | 11 | 170 | 246 | 450 |
Net exposure | |||||||
Home loans | 4,352 | 435 | 5 | 4 | 444 | 155 | 4,951 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 3,413 | 582 | 20 | 19 | 621 | 120 | 4,154 |
Wholesale loans | 3,210 | 369 | 10 | 292 | 671 | 97 | 3,978 |
Loans and advances to customers | 10,975 | 1,386 | 35 | 315 | 1,736 | 372 | 13,083 |
Loans and advances to banks | 895 | 8 | — | — | 8 | — | 903 |
Totala | 11,870 | 1,394 | 35 | 315 | 1,744 | 372 | 13,986 |
Coverage ratio | % | % | % | % | % | % | % |
Home loans | 0.1 | 8.0 | 28.6 | 20.0 | 8.5 | 20.9 | 1.7 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 0.8 | 14.7 | 20.0 | 32.1 | 15.5 | 58.3 | 6.9 |
Wholesale loans | 0.1 | 3.7 | — | 0.3 | 2.2 | 27.6 | 1.4 |
Loans and advances to customers | 0.3 | 9.9 | 16.7 | 3.4 | 8.9 | 39.8 | 3.3 |
Loans and advances to banks | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Totala | 0.3 | 9.8 | 16.7 | 3.4 | 8.9 | 39.8 | 3.1 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home Loans | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 4,355 | 3 | 485 | 41 | 196 | 41 | 5,036 | 85 |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (136) | — | 136 | — | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 323 | 17 | (323) | (17) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | (13) | — | (27) | (4) | 40 | 4 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | — | — | 28 | 2 | (28) | (2) | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Refinements to models used for calculations | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | (298) | (17) | (17) | 6 | (7) | 7 | (322) | (4) |
Final repaymentsc | (206) | — | (17) | (2) | (7) | — | (230) | (2) |
Disposalsd | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Write-offse | — | — | — | — | (4) | (4) | (4) | (4) |
As at 31 December 2022f | 4,025 | 3 | 265 | 26 | 190 | 46 | 4,480 | 75 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 3,440 | 27 | 735 | 114 | 288 | 168 | 4,463 | 309 |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (453) | (6) | 453 | 6 | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 165 | 30 | (165) | (30) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | (48) | (2) | (45) | (12) | 93 | 14 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | (5) | (4) | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | 1,358 | 15 | 78 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 1,447 | 35 |
Refinements to models used for calculations | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | (324) | (20) | 125 | 69 | (15) | 66 | (214) | 115 |
Final repaymentsc | (497) | (6) | (9) | (1) | (24) | (9) | (530) | (16) |
Disposalsd | — | — | — | — | (49) | (26) | (49) | (26) |
Write-offse | — | — | — | — | (38) | (38) | (38) | (38) |
As at 31 December 2022f | 3,644 | 41 | 1,174 | 159 | 261 | 179 | 5,079 | 379 |
Wholesale loansg | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 4,109 | 4 | 694 | 15 | 134 | 37 | 4,937 | 56 |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (261) | (1) | 261 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 383 | 6 | (383) | (6) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | — | — | (37) | (2) | 37 | 2 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | — | — | 18 | — | (18) | — | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | 1,923 | 5 | 162 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2,088 | 10 |
Refinements to models used for calculations | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 487 | 8 | 137 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 640 | 32 |
Final repaymentsc | (1,215) | — | (59) | (3) | (4) | — | (1,278) | (3) |
Disposalsd | — | — | (37) | — | — | — | (37) | — |
Write-offse | — | — | — | — | (8) | (8) | (8) | (8) |
As at 31 December 2022f | 5,426 | 22 | 756 | 25 | 160 | 40 | 6,342 | 87 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Loans and advance to banks | 1,394 | — | 18 | — | 2 | 2 | 1,414 | 2 |
Loans and advance to customers | 11,701 | 66 | 2,177 | 210 | 609 | 263 | 14,487 | 539 |
Total | 13,095 | 66 | 2,195 | 210 | 611 | 265 | 15,901 | 541 |
Reconciliation of ECL movement to credit impairment charge/(release) for the period (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home loans | — | (15) | 9 | (6) |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 14 | 45 | 75 | 134 |
Wholesale loans | 18 | 10 | 11 | 39 |
ECL movement excluding assets derecognised due to disposals and write-offs | 32 | 40 | 95 | 167 |
ECL movement on loan commitments and financial guarantees | 3 | 16 | — | 19 |
ECL movement on other financial assetsa | — | — | — | — |
Recoveries and reimbursementsb | (10) | (18) | 1 | (27) |
Total exchange and other adjustmentsc | 8 | |||
Total credit impairment charge for the year | 167 |
Loan commitments and financial guarantees (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 5,393 | — | 291 | — | 14 | — | 5,698 | — |
Net transfers between stages | (191) | — | 183 | — | 8 | — | — | — |
Business activity in the year | 732 | — | 8 | — | — | — | 740 | — |
Net drawdowns and repayments, net re- measurement and movement due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 99 | — | (62) | — | (11) | — | 26 | — |
Limit management and final repayments | (77) | — | — | — | — | — | (77) | — |
As at 31 December 2022 | 5,956 | — | 420 | — | 11 | — | 6,387 | — |
Wholesale loans | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 21,572 | 18 | 2,621 | 9 | 70 | — | 24,263 | 27 |
Net transfers between stages | (664) | 3 | 669 | (3) | (5) | — | — | — |
Business activity in the year | 2,945 | 3 | 865 | 4 | 1 | — | 3,811 | 7 |
Net drawdowns and repayments, net re- measurement and movement due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 3,389 | (3) | 563 | 17 | (1) | — | 3,951 | 14 |
Limit management and final repayments | (2,683) | — | (211) | (2) | (16) | — | (2,910) | (2) |
As at 31 December 2022 | 24,559 | 21 | 4,507 | 25 | 49 | — | 29,115 | 46 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home loans | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 4,673 | 5 | 768 | 55 | 217 | 38 | 5,658 | 98 |
Acquisitions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (79) | — | 79 | — | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 322 | 24 | (322) | (24) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | (14) | — | (30) | (5) | 44 | 5 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | 7 | — | 36 | 2 | (43) | (2) | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Refinements to models used for calculationsc | — | — | — | (1) | — | 10 | — | 9 |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | (316) | (26) | (23) | 15 | (12) | (6) | (351) | (17) |
Final repaymentsd | (238) | — | (23) | (1) | (7) | (1) | (268) | (2) |
Disposalse | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Write-offsf | — | — | — | — | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |
As at 31 December 2021g | 4,355 | 3 | 485 | 41 | 196 | 41 | 5,036 | 85 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 2,753 | 28 | 983 | 199 | 303 | 163 | 4,039 | 390 |
Acquisitions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (138) | (2) | 138 | 2 | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 339 | 61 | (339) | (61) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | (38) | (1) | (78) | (32) | 116 | 33 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | (16) | (3) | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | 1,111 | 14 | 49 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 1,168 | 26 |
Refinements to models used for calculationsc | — | — | — | (30) | — | — | — | (30) |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | (537) | (69) | (18) | 28 | (39) | 34 | (594) | (7) |
Final repaymentsd | (65) | (6) | (1) | — | (5) | (2) | (71) | (8) |
Disposalse | — | — | — | — | (43) | (26) | (43) | (26) |
Write-offsf | — | — | — | — | (36) | (36) | (36) | (36) |
As at 31 December 2021g | 3,440 | 27 | 735 | 114 | 288 | 168 | 4,463 | 309 |
Wholesale loansh | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 3,300 | 14 | 518 | 37 | 127 | 54 | 3,945 | 105 |
Acquisitions | 52 | — | — | — | 3 | — | 55 | — |
Transfers from Stage 1 to Stage 2 | (370) | (1) | 370 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 2 to Stage 1a | 285 | 20 | (285) | (20) | — | — | — | — |
Transfers to Stage 3 | — | — | (35) | (8) | 35 | 8 | — | — |
Transfers from Stage 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Business activity in the yearb | 822 | — | 20 | — | — | — | 842 | — |
Refinements to models used for calculationsc | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Net drawdowns, repayments, net re- measurement and movements due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 849 | (28) | 147 | 6 | 3 | (22) | 999 | (44) |
Final repaymentsd | (829) | (1) | (41) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (872) | (5) |
Disposalse | — | — | — | — | (32) | (1) | (32) | (1) |
Write-offsf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
As at 31 December 2021g | 4,109 | 4 | 694 | 15 | 134 | 37 | 4,937 | 56 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Loans and advances to Banks | 895 | — | 8 | — | — | — | 903 | — |
Loans and advances to Customers | 11,009 | 34 | 1,906 | 170 | 618 | 246 | 13,533 | 450 |
Total | 11,904 | 34 | 1,914 | 170 | 618 | 246 | 14,436 | 450 |
Reconciliation of ECL movement to credit impairment charge/(release) for the period (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home loans | (2) | (14) | 6 | (10) |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | (1) | (85) | 67 | (19) |
Wholesale loans | (10) | (22) | (16) | (48) |
ECL movement excluding assets derecognised due to disposals and write-offs | (13) | (121) | 57 | (77) |
ECL movement on loan commitments and financial guarantees | 4 | (29) | — | (25) |
ECL movement on other financial assetsa | — | — | — | — |
Recoveries and reimbursementsb | 14 | 4 | (3) | 15 |
Total exchange and other adjustmentsc | (10) | |||
Total credit impairment release for the year | (97) |
Loan commitments and financial guarantees (audited) | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | ||||
Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | Gross | ECL | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 4,685 | — | 261 | — | 4 | — | 4,950 | — |
Net transfers between stages | (3) | — | (11) | — | 14 | — | — | — |
Business activity in the year | 614 | — | 6 | — | — | — | 620 | — |
Net drawdowns and repayments, net re- measurement and movement due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 110 | — | 35 | — | (4) | — | 141 | — |
Limit management and final repayments | (13) | — | — | — | — | — | (13) | — |
As at 31 December 2021 | 5,393 | — | 291 | — | 14 | — | 5,698 | — |
Wholesale loans | ||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 18,423 | 14 | 2,614 | 38 | 126 | — | 21,163 | 52 |
Acquisitions | 1,133 | — | 184 | — | 4 | — | 1,321 | — |
Net transfers between stages | 347 | 11 | (282) | (11) | (65) | — | — | — |
Business activity in the year | 3,273 | 2 | 627 | 4 | — | — | 3,900 | 6 |
Net drawdowns and repayments, net re- measurement and movement due to exposure and risk parameter changes | 2,030 | (5) | (207) | (16) | 23 | 1 | 1,846 | (20) |
Limit management and final repayments | (3,634) | (4) | (315) | (6) | (18) | (1) | (3,967) | (11) |
As at 31 December 2021 | 21,572 | 18 | 2,621 | 9 | 70 | — | 24,263 | 27 |
Loans and advances at amortised costa (audited) | |||||||||
Gross Exposure | Impairment Allowance | ||||||||
Quantitative test | Qualitative test | 30 days past due backstop | Total Stage 2 | Quantitative test | Qualitative test | 30 days past due backstop | Total Stage 2 | ||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home Loans | 217 | 27 | 21 | 265 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 26 | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 1,117 | 50 | 7 | 1,174 | 146 | 11 | 2 | 159 | |
Wholesale loans | 637 | 119 | — | 756 | 24 | 1 | — | 25 | |
Total Stage 2 | 1,971 | 196 | 28 | 2,195 | 190 | 14 | 6 | 210 |
Loans and advances at amortised costa (audited) | |||||||||
Gross Exposure | Impairment Allowance | ||||||||
Quantitative test | Qualitative test | 30 days past due backstop | Total Stage 2 | Quantitative test | Qualitative test | 30 days past due backstop | Total Stage 2 | ||
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home Loans | 381 | 59 | 45 | 485 | 27 | 4 | 10 | 41 | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 635 | 90 | 10 | 735 | 103 | 9 | 2 | 114 | |
Wholesale loans | 341 | 107 | 246 | 694 | 10 | 5 | — | 15 | |
Total Stage 2 | 1,357 | 256 | 301 | 1,914 | 140 | 18 | 12 | 170 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | |||||||
Gross Exposure | Impairment Allowance | ||||||
Exposures not charged-off including within cure perioda | Exposures individually assessed or in recovery book | Total Stage 3 | Exposures not charged-off including within cure perioda | Exposures individually assessed or in recovery book | Total Stage 3 | ||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home Loans | 122 | 68 | 190 | 16 | 30 | 46 | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 139 | 122 | 261 | 101 | 78 | 179 | |
Wholesale loans | — | 160 | 160 | — | 40 | 40 | |
Total Stage 3 | 261 | 350 | 611 | 117 | 148 | 265 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost (audited) | |||||||
Gross Exposure | Impairment Allowance | ||||||
Exposures not charged-off including within cure perioda | Exposures individually assessed or in recovery book | Total Stage 3 | Exposures not charged-off including within cure perioda | Exposures individually assessed or in recovery book | Total Stage 3 | ||
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Home Loans | 133 | 63 | 196 | 17 | 24 | 41 | |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 143 | 145 | 288 | 89 | 79 | 168 | |
Wholesale loans | 21 | 113 | 134 | — | 37 | 37 | |
Total Stage 3 | 297 | 321 | 618 | 106 | 140 | 246 |
Management adjustments to models for impairment allowance presented by product: (audited)a | ||||||
Impairment allowance pre management adjustmentsb | Economic uncertainty adjustments (a) | Other adjustments (b) | Management adjustments (a)+(b) | Total impairment allowancec | Proportion of Management adjustments to total impairment allowance | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % |
Home loans | 75 | — | — | — | 75 | — |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 358 | 2 | 19 | 21 | 379 | 5.5 |
Wholesale loans | 116 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 133 | 12.8 |
Total | 549 | 13 | 25 | 38 | 587 | 6.5 |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % |
Home loans | 53 | 32 | — | 32 | 85 | 37.6 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 255 | 35 | 19 | 54 | 309 | 17.5 |
Wholesale loans | 68 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 83 | 18.1 |
Total | 376 | 80 | 21 | 101 | 477 | 21.2 |
Economic uncertainty adjustments presented by stage: (audited) | ||||
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Home loans | — | — | — | — |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | — | 2 | — | 2 |
Wholesale loans | 11 | — | — | 11 |
Total | 11 | 2 | — | 13 |
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Home loans | — | 28 | 4 | 32 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | (1) | 34 | 2 | 35 |
Wholesale loans | 11 | 2 | — | 13 |
Total | 10 | 64 | 6 | 80 |
Baseline average macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL | |||||
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 3.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Italy unemploymentb | 8.2 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
Italy HPIc | 0.4 | (3.0) | (1.4) | (0.7) | (0.3) |
Germany GDPa | 1.8 | (0.3) | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Germany HPIe | 2.1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
EA GDPa,i | 2.9 | — | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.2 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.3 |
ECB Refi | 0.9 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
UK GDPa | 3.3 | (0.8) | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
UK unemploymentg | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
UK bank rate | 1.8 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
US GDPa | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
US unemploymenth | 3.7 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
US federal funds rate | 2.1 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
As at 31 December 2021 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 6.4 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
Italy unemploymentb | 9.8 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.1 |
Italy HPIc | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.1 | (0.2) | (0.2) |
Germany GDPa | 2.6 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Germany HPIe | 5.7 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
EA GDPa,i | 5.3 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
EU unemploymentf | 7.1 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
ECB Refi | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
UK GDPa | 6.2 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
UK unemploymentg | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
UK bank rate | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
US GDPa | 5.5 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
US unemploymenth | 5.5 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
US federal funds rate | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Downside 2 average macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL | |||||
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 3.6 | (3.8) | (3.3) | (0.1) | — |
Italy unemploymentb | 8.2 | 10.4 | 12.9 | 12.5 | 11.4 |
Italy HPIc | 0.4 | (12.0) | (13.0) | (7.9) | 2.3 |
Germany GDPa | 1.8 | (2.8) | (1.6) | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.0 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 5.1 |
Germany HPIe | 2.1 | (19.0) | (21.1) | (13.3) | 5.7 |
EA GDPa,i | 2.9 | (3.4) | (3.9) | 1.9 | 3.0 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.2 | 8.3 | 10.7 | 10.2 | 9.1 |
ECB Refi | 0.9 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 4.2 |
UK GDPa | 3.3 | (3.4) | (3.8) | 2.0 | 2.3 |
UK unemploymentg | 3.7 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 8.0 | 7.4 |
UK bank rate | 1.8 | 7.3 | 7.9 | 6.6 | 5.5 |
US GDPa | 1.8 | (2.7) | (3.4) | 2.0 | 2.6 |
US unemploymenth | 3.7 | 6.0 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 7.1 |
US federal funds rate | 2.1 | 6.6 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
As at 31 December 2021 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 6.4 | 0.2 | (4.6) | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Italy unemploymentb | 9.8 | 11.6 | 14.1 | 12.8 | 11.3 |
Italy HPIc | 1.9 | (14.3) | (2.2) | 4.9 | 1.7 |
Germany GDPa | 2.6 | 0.2 | (3.2) | 3.6 | 4.1 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.8 | 5.7 | 7.7 | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Germany HPIe | 5.7 | (9.6) | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
EA GDPa,i | 5.3 | (0.1) | (3.6) | 4.0 | 5.0 |
EU unemploymentf | 7.1 | 8.7 | 10.6 | 9.4 | 8.2 |
ECB Refi | — | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
UK GDPa | 6.2 | 0.2 | (4.0) | 2.8 | 4.3 |
UK unemploymentg | 4.8 | 7.2 | 9.0 | 7.6 | 6.3 |
UK bank rate | 0.1 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
US GDPa | 5.5 | (0.8) | (3.5) | 2.5 | 3.2 |
US unemploymenth | 5.5 | 6.4 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 6.4 |
US federal funds rate | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.0 |
Downside 1 average macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL | |||||
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 3.6 | (1.7) | (1.0) | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Italy unemploymentb | 8.2 | 9.5 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 10.0 |
Italy HPIc | 0.4 | (7.6) | (7.4) | (4.3) | 1.0 |
Germany GDPa | 1.8 | (1.6) | — | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Germany HPIe | 2.1 | (8.5) | (7.7) | (2.8) | 4.5 |
EA GDPa,i | 2.9 | (1.7) | (1.1) | 2.0 | 2.5 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.2 | 7.4 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 7.7 |
ECB Refi | 0.9 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
UK GDPa | 3.3 | (2.1) | (1.5) | 1.9 | 2.1 |
UK unemploymentg | 3.7 | 5.2 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 5.8 |
UK bank rate | 1.8 | 5.9 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 4.6 |
US GDPa | 1.8 | (1.1) | (1.1) | 1.7 | 2.1 |
US unemploymenth | 3.7 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 5.9 |
US federal funds rate | 2.1 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 3.9 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
As at 31 December 2021 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 6.4 | 2.4 | (1.2) | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Italy unemploymentb | 9.8 | 10.7 | 11.9 | 11.2 | 10.5 |
Italy HPIc | 1.9 | (6.6) | (1.0) | 2.3 | 0.7 |
Germany GDPa | 2.6 | 2.0 | (0.5) | 2.8 | 3.0 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.8 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Germany HPIe | 5.7 | (3.1) | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
EA GDPa,i | 5.3 | 2.2 | (0.7) | 3.1 | 3.6 |
EU unemploymentf | 7.1 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 7.8 | 7.2 |
ECB Refi | — | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
UK GDPa | 6.2 | 2.8 | (0.7) | 2.3 | 2.9 |
UK unemploymentg | 4.8 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 5.3 |
UK bank rate | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
US GDPa | 5.5 | 1.6 | (0.4) | 2.4 | 2.7 |
US unemploymenth | 5.5 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 5.2 |
US federal funds rate | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Upside 2 average macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL | |||||
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 3.6 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
Italy unemploymentb | 8.2 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 7.4 |
Italy HPIc | 0.4 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
Germany GDPa | 1.8 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
Germany HPIe | 2.1 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
EA GDPa,i | 2.9 | 3.6 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.9 |
ECB Refi | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
UK GDPa | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
UK unemploymentg | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
UK bank rate | 1.8 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
US GDPa | 1.8 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
US unemploymenth | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
US federal funds rate | 2.1 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
As at 31 December 2021 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 6.4 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 2.6 |
Italy unemploymentb | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
Italy HPIc | 1.9 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
Germany GDPa | 2.6 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.8 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Germany HPIe | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
EA GDPa,i | 5.3 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
EU unemploymentf | 7.1 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.0 |
ECB Refi | — | — | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
UK GDPa | 6.2 | 7.2 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
UK unemploymentg | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
UK bank rate | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
US GDPa | 5.5 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 3.4 |
US unemploymenth | 5.5 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
US federal funds rate | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
Upside 1 average macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL | |||||
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 3.6 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Italy unemploymentb | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Italy HPIc | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.1) | 0.2 |
Germany GDPa | 1.8 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Germany HPIe | 2.1 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
EA GDPa,i | 2.9 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
ECB Refi | 0.9 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
UK GDPa | 3.3 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
UK unemploymentg | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
UK bank rate | 1.8 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
US GDPa | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
US unemploymenth | 3.7 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
US federal funds rate | 2.1 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
As at 31 December 2021 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPa | 6.4 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 2.3 |
Italy unemploymentb | 9.8 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.9 |
Italy HPIc | 1.9 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
Germany GDPa | 2.6 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.1 |
Germany unemploymentd | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Germany HPIe | 5.7 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
EA GDPa,i | 5.3 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 2.3 |
EU unemploymentf | 7.1 | 6.6 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
ECB Refi | — | — | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
UK GDPa | 6.2 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
UK unemploymentg | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.1 |
UK bank rate | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
US GDPa | 5.5 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
US unemploymenth | 5.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
US federal funds rate | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Scenario probability weighting (audited)a | |||||
Upside 2 | Upside 1 | Baseline | Downside 1 | Downside 2 | |
% | % | % | % | % | |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||
Scenario probability weighting | 10.9 | 23.1 | 39.4 | 17.6 | 9.0 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Scenario probability weighting | 20.9 | 27.2 | 30.1 | 14.8 | 7.0 |
Macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL (specific bases)a (audited) | |||||
Upside 2 | Upside 1 | Baseline | Downside 1 | Downside 2 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPb | 16.9 | 11.5 | 1.6 | (2.0) | (6.0) |
Italy unemploymentc | 7.4 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 13.0 |
Italy HPId | 9.4 | 2.9 | (1.0) | (17.7) | (29.2) |
Germany GDPb | 16.0 | 10.9 | 1.2 | (1.5) | (3.9) |
Germany unemploymentc | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 5.7 |
Germany HPId | 29.1 | 22.2 | 2.9 | (16.3) | (43.4) |
EA GDPb,h | 16.1 | 11.9 | 1.7 | (2.1) | (6.7) |
EU unemploymentc | 5.9 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 10.8 |
ECB Refic | — | — | 2.6 | 4.8 | 6.0 |
UK GDPb | 13.9 | 9.4 | 1.4 | (3.2) | (6.8) |
UK unemploymentc | 3.4 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 6.6 | 8.5 |
UK bank ratec | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 8.0 |
US GDPb | 14.1 | 9.6 | 1.3 | (2.5) | (6.3) |
US unemploymentc | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 6.7 | 8.6 |
US federal funds ratec | 0.1 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Italy GDPb | 26.0 | 21.0 | 3.4 | 0.2 | (1.3) |
Italy unemploymentc | 8.8 | 8.9 | 9.3 | 12.1 | 14.5 |
Italy HPId | 17.2 | 10.7 | 0.6 | (5.8) | (14.6) |
Germany GDPb | 20.4 | 16.0 | 2.5 | (2.0) | (3.1) |
Germany unemploymentc | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 5.6 | 8.0 |
Germany HPId | 27.7 | 23.7 | 3.7 | 1.5 | (4.5) |
EA GDPb,h | 24.0 | 19.6 | 3.2 | (0.3) | (1.6) |
EU unemploymentc | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 8.6 | 10.9 |
ECB Refic | — | — | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.5 |
UK GDPb | 21.4 | 18.3 | 3.4 | (1.6) | (1.6) |
UK unemploymentc | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 9.2 |
UK bank ratec | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 4.0 |
US GDPb | 22.8 | 19.6 | 3.4 | 1.5 | (1.3) |
US unemploymentc | 3.3 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 9.5 |
US federal funds ratec | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 3.5 |
Macroeconomic variables used in the calculation of ECL (5-year averages)a (audited) | |||||
Upside 2 | Upside 1 | Baseline | Downside 1 | Downside 2 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | % | % | % | % | % |
Italy GDPe | 3.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | (0.7) |
Italy unemploymentf | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.4 | 9.8 | 11.1 |
Italy HPIg | 1.6 | 0.3 | (1.0) | (3.6) | (6.3) |
Germany GDPe | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | (0.2) |
Germany unemploymentf | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
Germany HPIg | 5.2 | 4.1 | 2.9 | (2.6) | (9.8) |
EA GDPe,h | 3.3 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 8.9 |
ECB Refif | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 4.3 |
UK GDPe | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | — |
UK unemploymentf | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 6.7 |
UK bank ratef | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 5.8 |
US GDPe | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | — |
US unemploymentf | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 6.7 |
US federal funds ratef | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 5.2 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Italy GDPe | 5.0 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
Italy unemploymentf | 9.1 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 11.9 |
Italy HPIg | 3.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | (0.6) | (1.9) |
Germany GDPe | 4.1 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
Germany unemploymentf | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 5.7 |
Germany HPIg | 5.0 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
EA GDPe,h | 4.7 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
EU unemploymentf | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 8.8 |
ECB Refif | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
UK GDPe | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
UK unemploymentf | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 7.0 |
UK bank ratef | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
US GDPe | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
US unemploymentf | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 7.1 |
US federal funds ratef | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 |
ECL Sensitivity Analysis (audited) | ||||||
Scenarios | ||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Weighteda | Upside 2 | Upside 1 | Baseline | Downside 1 | Downside 2 |
Stage 1 Model exposure (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 4,018 | 4,050 | 4,040 | 4,023 | 3,987 | 3,947 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lendingb | 5,730 | 5,644 | 5,588 | 5,554 | 5,668 | 5,768 |
Wholesale loans | 11,078 | 11,171 | 11,168 | 11,141 | 10,771 | 10,307 |
Stage 1 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 25 | 19 | 23 | 24 | 27 | 31 |
Wholesale loans | 25 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 25 | 26 |
Stage 1 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Wholesale loans | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Stage 2 Model exposure (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 265 | 233 | 244 | 260 | 297 | 336 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lendingb | 1,383 | 1,167 | 1,362 | 1,527 | 1,589 | 1,678 |
Wholesale loans | 2,172 | 2,080 | 2,082 | 2,109 | 2,479 | 2,943 |
Stage 2 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 25 | 15 | 19 | 23 | 36 | 47 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 195 | 140 | 169 | 197 | 232 | 271 |
Wholesale loans | 49 | 41 | 41 | 44 | 62 | 82 |
Stage 2 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 9.4 | 6.4 | 7.8 | 8.8 | 12.1 | 14.0 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 14.1 | 12.0 | 12.4 | 12.9 | 14.6 | 16.2 |
Wholesale loans | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
Stage 3 Model exposure (€m)c | ||||||
Home loans | 190 | 190 | 190 | 190 | 190 | 190 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 | 130 |
Wholesale loans | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stage 3 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 46 | 41 | 43 | 45 | 49 | 53 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 92 | 91 | 92 | 92 | 94 | 94 |
Wholesale loansd | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stage 3 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 24.2 | 21.6 | 22.6 | 23.7 | 25.8 | 27.9 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 70.8 | 70.0 | 70.8 | 70.8 | 72.3 | 72.3 |
Wholesale loansd | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 74 | 59 | 65 | 71 | 89 | 104 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 312 | 250 | 284 | 313 | 353 | 396 |
Wholesale loansd | 74 | 64 | 65 | 70 | 87 | 108 |
Total ECL (€m) | 460 | 373 | 414 | 454 | 529 | 608 |
Reconciliation to total ECL | €m |
Total weighted model ECL | 460 |
ECL from individually assessed impairmentsd | 79 |
ECL from non-modelled exposures and others | 10 |
ECL from post model management adjustments | 38 |
Of which: ECL from economic uncertainty adjustments | 13 |
Total ECL | 587 |
ECL Sensitivity Analysis (audited) | ||||||
Scenarios | ||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Weighteda | Upside 2 | Upside 1 | Baseline | Downside 1 | Downside 2 |
Stage 1 Model exposure (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 4,575 | 4,587 | 4,582 | 4,577 | 4,553 | 4,533 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lendingb, c | 5,271 | 5,195 | 5,191 | 5,191 | 5,453 | 5,670 |
Wholesale loans | 10,185 | 10,225 | 10,193 | 10,224 | 10,090 | 9,999 |
Stage 1 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 22 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 26 | 31 |
Wholesale loans | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
Stage 1 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 0.1 | — | — | — | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Wholesale loans | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Stage 2 Model exposure (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 250 | 239 | 243 | 248 | 273 | 293 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lendingb, c | 619 | 536 | 579 | 617 | 745 | 898 |
Wholesale loans | 2,441 | 2,402 | 2,433 | 2,403 | 2,537 | 2,627 |
Stage 2 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 13 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 26 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 93 | 75 | 83 | 90 | 123 | 162 |
Wholesale loans | 26 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 31 | 40 |
Stage 2 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 5.2 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 7.7 | 8.9 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 15.0 | 14.0 | 14.3 | 14.6 | 16.5 | 18.0 |
Wholesale loans | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
Stage 3 Model exposure (€m)d | ||||||
Home loans | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 | 196 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 |
Wholesale loans | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stage 3 Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 37 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 41 | 45 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 94 | 96 |
Wholesale loanse | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stage 3 Coverage (%) | ||||||
Home loans | 18.9 | 17.3 | 17.9 | 18.4 | 20.9 | 23.0 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 67.6 | 67.6 | 67.6 | 67.6 | 69.1 | 70.6 |
Wholesale loanse | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Model ECL (€m) | ||||||
Home loans | 53 | 47 | 49 | 50 | 65 | 75 |
Credit cards, unsecured loans and other retail lending | 207 | 187 | 195 | 203 | 243 | 289 |
Wholesale loanse | 35 | 32 | 34 | 34 | 41 | 51 |
Total ECL (€m) | 295 | 266 | 278 | 287 | 349 | 415 |
Reconciliation to total ECL | €m |
Total weighted model ECL | 295 |
ECL from individually assessed impairmentse | 84 |
ECL from non-modelled exposures and others | (3) |
ECL from post model management adjustments | 101 |
Of which: ECL from economic uncertainty adjustments | 80 |
Total ECL | 477 |
Credit risk concentrations by geography (audited) | |||||||||||
Europe | United Kingdom | Rest of World | Total | ||||||||
France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Nether- lands | Spain | Rest of Europe | Europe total | ||||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
On-balance sheet: | |||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 14 | 30,036 | 445 | 22 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 30,540 | — | — | 30,540 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 1,836 | 4,208 | 315 | 1,107 | 1,079 | 513 | 1,925 | 10,983 | 7,073 | 484 | 18,540 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 685 | 4,805 | 1,058 | 4,957 | 81 | 337 | 1,901 | 13,824 | 1,075 | 461 | 15,360 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,764 | — | 1,764 |
Trading portfolio assets | 1,943 | 1,257 | 6 | 1,827 | 191 | 694 | 1,057 | 6,975 | 153 | 434 | 7,562 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 6,947 | 970 | 90 | 768 | 102 | 423 | 2,967 | 12,267 | 4,811 | 136 | 17,214 |
Derivative financial instruments | 4,870 | 5,991 | 2,526 | 619 | 15,578 | 2,712 | 6,508 | 38,804 | 1,512 | 123 | 40,439 |
Other assets | — | 4 | 18 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 56 | 320 | 1 | 377 |
Total on-balance sheet | 16,295 | 47,271 | 4,458 | 9,326 | 17,036 | 4,688 | 14,375 | 113,449 | 16,708 | 1,639 | 131,796 |
Off-balance sheet: | |||||||||||
Contingent liabilities | 233 | 422 | 549 | 1,342 | 33 | 977 | 309 | 3,865 | 652 | 254 | 4,771 |
Loan commitments | 8,012 | 11,745 | 1,002 | 2,307 | 993 | 1,437 | 4,577 | 30,073 | 985 | 1,402 | 32,460 |
Total off-balance sheet | 8,245 | 12,167 | 1,551 | 3,649 | 1,026 | 2,414 | 4,886 | 33,938 | 1,637 | 1,656 | 37,231 |
Total | 24,540 | 59,438 | 6,009 | 12,975 | 18,062 | 7,102 | 19,261 | 147,387 | 18,345 | 3,295 | 169,027 |
Credit risk concentrations by geography (audited) | |||||||||||
Europe | United Kingdom | Rest of World | Total | ||||||||
France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Nether- lands | Spain | Rest of Europe | Europe total | ||||
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
On-balance sheet: | |||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 79 | 21,047 | 2,690 | 157 | 21 | 91 | 40 | 24,125 | — | — | 24,125 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 1,689 | 3,899 | 341 | 398 | 5,320 | 281 | 1,583 | 13,511 | 3,583 | 557 | 17,651 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 472 | 4,370 | 899 | 5,700 | 199 | 243 | 1,246 | 13,129 | 623 | 234 | 13,986 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,228 | — | 3,228 |
Trading portfolio assets | 1,374 | 1,585 | 74 | 2,548 | 631 | 582 | 630 | 7,424 | 118 | 519 | 8,061 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 5,277 | 502 | 24 | 799 | 11 | 901 | 1,901 | 9,415 | 5,936 | — | 15,351 |
Derivative financial instruments | 2,995 | 8,251 | 500 | 822 | 8,719 | 2,903 | 3,702 | 27,892 | 5,648 | 335 | 33,875 |
Other assets | 1 | 8 | 10 | 30 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 65 | 116 | — | 181 |
Total on-balance sheet | 11,887 | 39,662 | 4,538 | 10,454 | 14,902 | 5,006 | 9,112 | 95,561 | 19,252 | 1,645 | 116,458 |
Off-balance sheet: | |||||||||||
Contingent liabilities | 135 | 285 | 1,048 | 1,002 | 31 | 652 | 158 | 3,311 | 663 | 85 | 4,059 |
Loan commitments | 7,508 | 9,616 | 891 | 1,452 | 1,228 | 1,113 | 3,350 | 25,158 | 805 | 1,462 | 27,425 |
Total off-balance sheet | 7,643 | 9,901 | 1,939 | 2,454 | 1,259 | 1,765 | 3,508 | 28,469 | 1,468 | 1,547 | 31,484 |
Total | 19,530 | 49,563 | 6,477 | 12,908 | 16,161 | 6,771 | 12,620 | 124,030 | 20,720 | 3,192 | 147,942 |
Credit risk concentrations by industry (audited) | ||||||||||||
Banks | Other financial institutions | Manu- facturing | Construc- tion and property | Govern- ment and central banks | Energy and water | Wholesale and retail distribu- tion and leisure | Business and other services | Home loans | Cards, unsecured loans and other personal lending | Other | Total | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
On-balance sheet: | ||||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 29 | — | — | — | 30,511 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30,540 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 5,546 | 11,093 | 7 | 11 | 1,375 | 113 | 2 | 28 | — | — | 365 | 18,540 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 1,412 | 1,765 | 639 | 298 | 18 | 331 | 650 | 489 | 4,407 | 4,851 | 500 | 15,360 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 1,764 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,764 |
Trading portfolio assets | 977 | 893 | 100 | 91 | 5,107 | 204 | 5 | 100 | — | — | 85 | 7,562 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 8,167 | 6,113 | — | — | 2,614 | — | — | 7 | 313 | — | — | 17,214 |
Derivative financial instruments | 14,342 | 21,300 | 1,016 | 56 | 1,147 | 1,738 | 39 | 145 | — | — | 656 | 40,439 |
Other assets | 313 | 63 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 377 |
Total on-balance sheet | 32,550 | 41,227 | 1,762 | 456 | 40,772 | 2,386 | 696 | 770 | 4,720 | 4,851 | 1,606 | 131,796 |
Off-balance sheet: | ||||||||||||
Contingent liabilities | 522 | 609 | 1,745 | 295 | — | 696 | 110 | 500 | — | 1 | 293 | 4,771 |
Loan commitments | 587 | 3,069 | 8,150 | 1,125 | — | 7,375 | 1,296 | 1,266 | — | 6,320 | 3,272 | 32,460 |
Total off-balance sheet | 1,109 | 3,678 | 9,895 | 1,420 | — | 8,071 | 1,406 | 1,766 | — | 6,321 | 3,565 | 37,231 |
Total | 33,659 | 44,905 | 11,657 | 1,876 | 40,772 | 10,457 | 2,102 | 2,536 | 4,720 | 11,172 | 5,171 | 169,027 |
Credit risk concentrations by industry (audited) | ||||||||||||
Banks | Other financial institutions | Manu- facturing | Construc- tion and property | Govern- ment and central banks | Energy and water | Wholesale and retail distribu- tion and leisure | Business and other services | Home loans | Cards, unsecured loans and other personal lending | Other | Total | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
On-balance sheet: | ||||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 28 | — | — | — | 24,097 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,125 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 4,325 | 12,054 | 11 | — | 877 | 245 | — | 13 | — | — | 126 | 17,651 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 892 | 982 | 418 | 189 | 41 | 917 | 566 | 344 | 4,951 | 4,304 | 382 | 13,986 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 3,228 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,228 |
Trading portfolio assets | 980 | 377 | 389 | 86 | 5,582 | 61 | 18 | 363 | — | — | 205 | 8,061 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 8,478 | 4,999 | — | — | 1,548 | — | — | — | 326 | — | — | 15,351 |
Derivative financial instruments | 15,633 | 11,959 | 658 | 162 | 3,572 | 1,146 | 33 | 149 | — | — | 563 | 33,875 |
Other assets | 97 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 181 |
Total on-balance sheet | 33,661 | 30,449 | 1,476 | 437 | 35,717 | 2,369 | 617 | 869 | 5,277 | 4,304 | 1,282 | 116,458 |
Off-balance sheet: | ||||||||||||
Contingent liabilities | 424 | 1,037 | 1,172 | 316 | — | 386 | 166 | 270 | — | — | 288 | 4,059 |
Loan commitments | 212 | 2,251 | 7,101 | 1,244 | — | 4,934 | 1,197 | 1,488 | — | 5,673 | 3,325 | 27,425 |
Total off-balance sheet | 636 | 3,288 | 8,273 | 1,560 | — | 5,320 | 1,363 | 1,758 | — | 5,673 | 3,613 | 31,484 |
Total | 34,297 | 33,737 | 9,749 | 1,997 | 35,717 | 7,689 | 1,980 | 2,627 | 5,277 | 9,977 | 4,895 | 147,942 |
PD Range % | Internal DG Band | Default Probability | Credit Quality description | Moody’s | Standard and Poor’s | ||
>Min | Mid | <=Max | |||||
0.00 to < 0.15 | 1 | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.02% | Strong | Aaa, Aa1, Aa2 | AAA, AA+, AA |
2 | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | Aa3 | AA- | ||
3 | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.05% | A1, A2, A3 | A+ | ||
4 | 0.05% | 0.08% | 0.10% | A1, A2, A3 | A, A- | ||
5 | 0.10% | 0.13% | 0.15% | Baa1 | BBB+ | ||
0.15 to < 0.25 | 6 | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.20% | Strong | Baa2 | BBB |
7 | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.25% | Baa3 | BBB | ||
0.25 to < 0.50 | 8 | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.30% | Strong | Baa3 | BBB- |
9 | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.40% | Baa3 | BBB- | ||
10 | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.50% | Ba1 | BB+ | ||
0.50 to < 0.75 | 11 | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.60% | Strong | Ba1 | BB+ |
12 | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.75% | Satisfactory | Ba2, Ba3 | BB, BB- | |
0.75 to < 2.50 | 12 | 0.75% | 0.98% | 1.20% | Satisfactory | Ba2, Ba3 | BB, BB- |
13 | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.55% | Ba3 | BB- | ||
14 | 1.55% | 1.85% | 2.15% | Ba3 | B+ | ||
15 | 2.15% | 2.33% | 2.50% | B1 | B+ | ||
2.50 to < 10.00 | 15 | 2.50% | 2.78% | 3.05% | Satisfactory | B1 | B+ |
16 | 3.05% | 3.75% | 4.45% | B2 | B+ | ||
17 | 4.45% | 5.40% | 6.35% | B3, Caa1 | B | ||
18 | 6.35% | 7.50% | 8.65% | B3, Caa1 | B- | ||
19 | 8.65% | 9.35% | 10.00% | B3, Caa1 | CCC+ | ||
10.00 to < 100.00 | 19 | 10.00% | 10.68% | 11.35% | Higher risk | B3, Caa1 | CCC+ |
20 | 11.35% | 15.00% | 18.65% | Caa2 | CCC | ||
21 | 18.65% | 30.00% | 99.99% | Caa3, Ca, C | CCC-, CC+ ,CC, C | ||
100.00 (Default) | 22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | D | D | ||
Balance sheet credit quality (audited) | |||||||||
PD range | 0.0 to <0.60% | 0.60 to <11.35% | 11.35% to 100% | Total | 0.0 to <0.60% | 0.60 to <11.35% | 11.35% to 100% | Total | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | % | % | % | |
Cash and balances at central banks | 30,540 | — | — | 30,540 | 100 | — | — | 100 | |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 17,510 | 1,024 | 6 | 18,540 | 94 | 6 | — | 100 | |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | |||||||||
Home loans | 3,636 | 572 | 197 | 4,405 | 83 | 13 | 4 | 100 | |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 1,923 | 2,613 | 164 | 4,700 | 41 | 56 | 3 | 100 | |
Wholesale loans | 3,245 | 1,376 | 222 | 4,843 | 67 | 28 | 5 | 100 | |
Loans and advances to customers | 8,804 | 4,561 | 583 | 13,948 | 63 | 33 | 4 | 100 | |
Loans and advances to banks | 1,390 | 22 | — | 1,412 | 98 | 2 | — | 100 | |
Total loans and advances at amortised cost | 10,194 | 4,583 | 583 | 15,360 | 66 | 30 | 4 | 100 | |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 1,764 | — | — | 1,764 | 100 | — | — | 100 | |
Trading portfolio assets: | |||||||||
Debt securities | 7,221 | 86 | — | 7,307 | 99 | 1 | — | 100 | |
Traded loans | 183 | 10 | 62 | 255 | 72 | 4 | 24 | 100 | |
Total trading portfolio assets | 7,404 | 96 | 62 | 7,562 | 98 | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement: | |||||||||
Loans and advances | 1,484 | 252 | 31 | 1,767 | 84 | 14 | 2 | 100 | |
Debt securities | 3 | — | 21 | 24 | 13 | — | 87 | 100 | |
Reverse repurchase agreements | 14,292 | 988 | 143 | 15,423 | 93 | 6 | 1 | 100 | |
Other financial assets | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Total financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 15,779 | 1,240 | 195 | 17,214 | 92 | 7 | 1 | 100 | |
Derivative financial instruments | 39,307 | 1,103 | 29 | 40,439 | 97 | 3 | — | 100 | |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Other assets | 371 | 6 | — | 377 | 98 | 2 | — | 100 | |
Total on-balance sheet | 122,869 | 8,052 | 875 | 131,796 | 93 | 6 | 1 | 100 |
Balance sheet credit quality (audited) | |||||||||
PD range | 0.0 to <0.60% | 0.60 to <11.35% | 11.35% to 100% | Total | 0.0 to <0.60% | 0.60 to <11.35% | 11.35% to 100% | Total | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | % | % | % | |
Cash and balances at central banks | 24,125 | — | — | 24,125 | 100 | — | — | 100 | |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 17,196 | 455 | — | 17,651 | 97 | 3 | — | 100 | |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | |||||||||
Home loans | 4,078 | 675 | 198 | 4,951 | 82 | 14 | 4 | 100 | |
Credit cards, unsecured and other retail lending | 1,982 | 2,001 | 171 | 4,154 | 48 | 48 | 4 | 100 | |
Wholesale loans | 3,099 | 672 | 207 | 3,978 | 78 | 17 | 5 | 100 | |
Loans and advances to customers | 9,159 | 3,348 | 576 | 13,083 | 70 | 26 | 4 | 100 | |
Loans and advances to banks | 858 | 45 | — | 903 | 95 | 5 | — | 100 | |
Total loans and advances at amortised cost | 10,017 | 3,393 | 576 | 13,986 | 72 | 24 | 4 | 100 | |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 3,228 | — | — | 3,228 | 100 | — | — | 100 | |
Trading portfolio assets: | |||||||||
Debt securities | 7,004 | 419 | — | 7,423 | 94 | 6 | — | 100 | |
Traded loans | 137 | 494 | 7 | 638 | 21 | 78 | 1 | 100 | |
Total trading portfolio assets | 7,141 | 913 | 7 | 8,061 | 89 | 11 | — | 100 | |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement: | |||||||||
Loans and advances | 517 | 178 | 31 | 726 | 71 | 25 | 4 | 100 | |
Debt securities | 4 | 1 | 19 | 24 | 17 | 4 | 79 | 100 | |
Reverse repurchase agreements | 13,647 | 943 | 11 | 14,601 | 94 | 6 | — | 100 | |
Other financial assets | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Total financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 14,168 | 1,122 | 61 | 15,351 | 93 | 7 | — | 100 | |
Derivative financial instruments | 33,428 | 447 | — | 33,875 | 99 | 1 | — | 100 | |
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Other assets | 175 | 6 | — | 181 | 97 | 3 | — | 100 | |
Total on-balance sheet | 109,478 | 6,336 | 644 | 116,458 | 94 | 5 | 1 | 100 |
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loans and advances to banks at amortised cost (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 1,106 | — | — | 1,106 | — | — | — | — | 1,106 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 249 | — | — | 249 | — | — | — | — | 249 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 17 | — | — | 17 | — | — | — | — | 17 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 10 | 8 | — | 18 | — | — | — | — | 18 | — |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 6 | — | — | 6 | — | — | — | — | 6 | — |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 2 | 10 | — | 12 | — | — | — | — | 12 | — |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | 4 | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | 4 | — |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 2 | 2 | — | — | 2 | 2 | — | 100 |
Total | 1,394 | 18 | 2 | 1,414 | — | — | 2 | 2 | 1,412 | 0.1 | ||
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loans and advances to customers at amortised cost (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 465 | — | — | 465 | — | — | — | — | 465 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 1,557 | — | — | 1,557 | 2 | — | — | 2 | 1,555 | 0.1 |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 1,762 | 123 | — | 1,885 | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1,883 | 0.1 |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 4,775 | 145 | — | 4,920 | 17 | 2 | — | 19 | 4,901 | 0.4 |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 2,458 | 822 | — | 3,280 | 23 | 61 | — | 84 | 3,196 | 2.6 |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 653 | 823 | — | 1,476 | 22 | 100 | — | 122 | 1,354 | 8.3 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | 10 | 2 | — | 12 | 1 | — | — | 1 | 11 | 8.3 |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 21 | 262 | — | 283 | — | 46 | — | 46 | 237 | 16.3 |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 609 | 609 | — | — | 263 | 263 | 346 | 43.2 |
Total | 11,701 | 2,177 | 609 | 14,487 | 66 | 210 | 263 | 539 | 13,948 | 3.7 |
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loans and advances to banks at amortised cost (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 814 | — | — | 814 | — | — | — | — | 814 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 10 | — | — | 10 | — | — | — | — | 10 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 34 | — | — | 34 | — | — | — | — | 34 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 37 | — | — | 37 | — | — | — | — | 37 | — |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | — | 8 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | 8 | — |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total | 895 | 8 | — | 903 | — | — | — | — | 903 | — | ||
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loans and advances to customers at amortised cost (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 442 | 114 | — | 556 | — | — | — | — | 556 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 1,506 | 40 | — | 1,546 | — | — | — | — | 1,546 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 2,072 | 173 | — | 2,245 | 1 | — | — | 1 | 2,244 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 4,641 | 186 | — | 4,827 | 14 | — | — | 14 | 4,813 | 0.3 |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 1,988 | 493 | — | 2,481 | 10 | 47 | — | 57 | 2,424 | 2.3 |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 342 | 649 | — | 991 | 8 | 78 | — | 86 | 905 | 9.0 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | 11 | 11 | — | 22 | — | 3 | — | 3 | 19 | 13.6 |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 7 | 240 | — | 247 | 1 | 42 | — | 43 | 204 | 17.4 |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 618 | 618 | — | — | 246 | 246 | 372 | 39.8 |
Total | 11,009 | 1,906 | 618 | 13,533 | 34 | 170 | 246 | 450 | 13,083 | 3.3 | ||
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for contingent liabilities (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 550 | 2 | — | 552 | — | — | — | — | 552 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 1,142 | 4 | — | 1,146 | 1 | — | — | 1 | 1,145 | 10.0 |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 798 | 52 | — | 850 | — | — | — | — | 850 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 589 | 185 | — | 774 | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 770 | 50.0 |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 479 | 483 | — | 962 | 5 | 2 | — | 7 | 955 | 70.0 |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 186 | 218 | — | 404 | 3 | 9 | — | 12 | 392 | 300.0 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | 11 | 12 | — | 23 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 22 | 430.0 |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 4 | 10 | — | 14 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 13 | 710.0 |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 46 | 46 | — | — | — | — | 46 | — |
Total | 3,759 | 966 | 46 | 4,771 | 12 | 14 | — | 26 | 4,745 | 50.0 |
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for contingent liabilities (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 1,182 | 11 | — | 1,193 | — | — | — | — | 1,193 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 696 | 44 | — | 740 | — | — | — | — | 740 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 716 | 25 | — | 741 | — | — | — | — | 741 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 610 | 4 | — | 614 | 1 | — | — | 1 | 613 | 0.2 |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 388 | 53 | — | 441 | — | — | — | — | 441 | — |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 96 | 152 | — | 248 | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 245 | 1.2 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | — | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 12 | 11 | — | 23 | — | — | — | — | 23 | — |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 58 | 58 | — | — | — | — | 58 | — |
Total | 3,700 | 301 | 58 | 4,059 | 2 | 2 | — | 4 | 4,055 | 0.1 | ||
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loan commitmentsa (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 7,576 | — | — | 7,576 | — | — | — | — | 7,576 | — |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 8,482 | 1,357 | — | 9,839 | — | — | — | — | 9,839 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 5,987 | 531 | — | 6,518 | 1 | — | — | 1 | 6,517 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 2,502 | 489 | — | 2,991 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 2,990 | — |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 1,391 | 540 | — | 1,931 | 5 | 1 | — | 6 | 1,925 | 0.3 |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 804 | 962 | — | 1,766 | 3 | 8 | — | 11 | 1,755 | 0.6 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | 9 | — | — | 9 | — | — | — | — | 9 | — |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 5 | 82 | — | 87 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 86 | 1.1 |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 14 | 14 | — | — | — | — | 14 | — |
Total | 26,756 | 3,961 | 14 | 30,731 | 9 | 11 | — | 20 | 30,711 | 0.1 |
Credit risk profile by internal PD grade for loan commitmentsa (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Gross carrying amount | Allowance for ECL | Net exposure | Coverage ratio | ||||||||
PD range | Credit quality description | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |||
Grading | % | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | |
1-3 | 0.0 to < 0.05% | Strong | 6,372 | 438 | — | 6,810 | 4 | — | — | 4 | 6,806 | 0.1 |
4-5 | 0.05 to < 0.15% | Strong | 7,907 | 873 | — | 8,780 | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 8,778 | — |
6-8 | 0.15 to < 0.30% | Strong | 4,547 | 117 | — | 4,664 | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 4,662 | — |
9-11 | 0.30 to < 0.60% | Strong | 1,662 | 313 | — | 1,975 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 1,974 | 0.1 |
12-14 | 0.60 to < 2.15% | Satisfactory | 1,937 | 182 | — | 2,119 | 8 | — | — | 8 | 2,111 | 0.4 |
15-19 | 2.15 to < 10% | Satisfactory | 610 | 565 | — | 1,175 | 2 | 2 | — | 4 | 1,171 | 0.3 |
19 | 10 to < 11.35% | Satisfactory | — | 5 | — | 5 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 4 | 20.0 |
20-21 | 11.35 to < 100% | Higher Risk | 230 | 118 | — | 348 | — | 1 | — | 1 | 347 | 0.3 |
22 | 100% | Credit Impaired | — | — | 26 | 26 | — | — | — | — | 26 | — |
Total | 23,265 | 2,611 | 26 | 25,902 | 16 | 7 | — | 23 | 25,879 | 0.1 |
Home loans principal portfolios - distribution of balances by Loan To Value (‘LTV’)a (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Distribution of balances | Distribution of impairment allowance | Coverage ratio | |||||||||
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | % | % | % | |
<=75% | 3,301 | 201 | 110 | 3,612 | 2 | 17 | 17 | 36 | 0.1% | 8.5% | 15.5% | 1.0% |
>75% and <=90% | 421 | 35 | 22 | 478 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 0.2% | 11.4% | 27.3% | 2.3% |
>90% and <=100% | 150 | 13 | 15 | 178 | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | —% | 15.4% | 26.7% | 3.4% |
>100% | 153 | 16 | 43 | 212 | — | 3 | 19 | 22 | —% | 18.8% | 44.2% | 10.4% |
Total | 4,025 | 265 | 190 | 4,480 | 3 | 26 | 46 | 75 | 0.1% | 9.8% | 24.2% | 1.7% |
Home loans principal portfolios - distribution of balances by Loan To Value (‘LTV’)a (audited) | ||||||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Distribution of balances | Distribution of impairment allowance | Coverage ratio | |||||||||
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | % | % | % | % | |
<=75% | 3,511 | 361 | 118 | 3,990 | 2 | 30 | 17 | 49 | 0.1% | 8.3% | 14.4% | 1.2% |
>75% and <=90% | 476 | 69 | 25 | 570 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 0.2% | 8.7% | 20.0% | 2.1% |
>90% and <=100% | 175 | 24 | 14 | 213 | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | —% | 8.3% | 21.4% | 2.3% |
>100% | 193 | 31 | 39 | 263 | — | 3 | 16 | 19 | —% | 9.7% | 41.0% | 7.2% |
Total | 4,355 | 485 | 196 | 5,036 | 3 | 41 | 41 | 85 | 0.1% | 8.5% | 20.9% | 1.7% |
Home loans principal portfolios - distribution of balances by LTVa (audited) | ||||||||
As at 31 December 2022 | Distribution of balances | Distribution of impairment allowance | ||||||
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
% | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
<=75% | 73.7 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 80.6 | 2.7 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 48.0 |
>75% and <=90% | 9.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 10.7 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 8.0 | 14.7 |
>90% and <=100% | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4.0 | — | 2.7 | 5.3 | 8.0 |
>100% | 3.4 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 4.7 | — | 4.0 | 25.3 | 29.3 |
Home loans principal portfolios - distribution of balances by LTVa (audited) | ||||||||
As at 31 December 2021 | Distribution of balances | Distribution of impairment allowance | ||||||
Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Total | |
% | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
<=75% | 69.7 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 79.2 | 2.4 | 35.3 | 20.0 | 57.6 |
>75% and <=90% | 9.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 11.3 | 1.2 | 7.1 | 5.9 | 14.1 |
>90% and <=100% | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 4.2 | — | 2.4 | 3.5 | 5.9 |
>100% | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 5.2 | — | 3.5 | 18.8 | 22.4 |
Management VaR (95%, one day) (audited) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
Average | High | Low | Average | High | Low | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Credit risk | 1.49 | 3.53 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 1.82 | 0.44 |
Interest rate risk | 1.73 | 4.20 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 2.58 | 0.21 |
Equity risk | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.02 |
Basis risk | 0.60 | 1.55 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.63 | 0.18 |
Spread risk | 3.00 | 6.70 | 0.78 | 1.23 | 2.79 | 0.42 |
Foreign exchange risk | 0.32 | 0.84 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.03 |
Commodity risk | 0.05 | 0.37 | — | — | — | — |
Inflation risk | 0.95 | 2.54 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.01 |
Diversification effecta | (4.06) | n/a | n/a | (1.93) | n/a | n/a |
Total management VaR | 4.15 | 8.16 | 1.57 | 1.67 | 3.25 | 0.77 |
Credit ratings | ||
As at 31 December 2022 | Standard & Poor's | Fitch |
Long-term | A /Positive | A+ / Stable |
Short-term | A-1 | F1 |
31 December 2022 | 31 December 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Liquidity poola | 30,709 | 25,445 |
% | % | |
Liquidity coverage ratio | 194 | 171 |
Contractual maturity of financial assets and liabilities (audited) | |||||||||||
On demand | Not more than three months | Over three months but not more than six months | Over six months but not more than nine months | Over nine months but not more than one year | Over one year but not more than two years | Over two years but not more than three years | Over three years but not more than five years | Over five years but not more than ten years | Over ten years | Total | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Assets | |||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 30,540 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30,540 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 18,540 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,540 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 1,896 | 784 | 474 | 526 | 641 | 1,841 | 1,927 | 2,586 | 2,173 | 2,512 | 15,360 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | — | 204 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,560 | — | — | 1,764 |
Trading portfolio assets | 7,700 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,700 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 13 | 15,322 | 6 | 635 | 105 | 525 | 38 | 113 | 90 | 369 | 17,216 |
Derivative financial instruments | 40,435 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | — | 40,439 |
Other financial assets | 14 | — | 342 | — | — | 21 | — | — | — | — | 377 |
Total financial assets | 80,598 | 34,850 | 822 | 1,161 | 746 | 2,387 | 1,965 | 4,259 | 2,267 | 2,881 | 131,936 |
Other assets | 598 | ||||||||||
Total assets | 132,534 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||
Deposits at amortised cost | 10,167 | 14,344 | 2,849 | 747 | 576 | 106 | 157 | 74 | 383 | 18 | 29,421 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 24,684 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,684 |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | — | 937 | — | — | 1,000 | 1,027 | — | — | — | — | 2,964 |
Debt securities in issue | — | 398 | 756 | 377 | 108 | — | 800 | — | 700 | — | 3,139 |
Subordinated liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | 653 | 772 | 1,752 | 1,502 | — | 4,679 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | 12,872 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,872 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | — | 9,227 | 171 | 654 | 294 | 1,497 | 865 | 624 | 776 | 750 | 14,858 |
Derivative financial instruments | 32,493 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 32,494 |
Other financial liabilities | 29 | 388 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 12 | 20 | 13 | 13 | 503 |
Total financial liabilities | 55,561 | 49,978 | 3,779 | 1,781 | 1,981 | 3,302 | 2,607 | 2,470 | 3,374 | 781 | 125,614 |
Other liabilities | 405 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 126,019 | ||||||||||
Cumulative liquidity gap | 25,037 | 9,909 | 6,952 | 6,332 | 5,097 | 4,182 | 3,540 | 5,329 | 4,222 | 6,322 | 6,515 |
Contractual maturity of financial assets and liabilities (audited) | |||||||||||
On demand | Not more than three months | Over three months but not more than six months | Over six months but not more than nine months | Over nine months but not more than one year | Over one year but not more than two years | Over two years but not more than three years | Over three years but not more than five years | Over five years but not more than ten years | Over ten years | Total | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Assets | |||||||||||
Cash and balances at central banks | 24,125 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,125 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 17,651 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,651 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 1,317 | 587 | 619 | 382 | 668 | 1,740 | 1,457 | 2,504 | 2,169 | 2,543 | 13,986 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | — | 51 | — | — | 1,427 | — | — | 1,750 | — | — | 3,228 |
Trading portfolio assets | 8,204 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,204 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 14 | 12,038 | 646 | 1,087 | 254 | 669 | 23 | 62 | 92 | 467 | 15,352 |
Derivative financial instruments | 33,875 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33,875 |
Other financial assets | 21 | — | 131 | — | — | 23 | — | — | — | — | 175 |
Total financial assets | 67,556 | 30,327 | 1,396 | 1,469 | 2,349 | 2,432 | 1,480 | 4,316 | 2,261 | 3,010 | 116,596 |
Other assets | 516 | ||||||||||
Total assets | 117,112 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||
Deposits at amortised cost | 12,801 | 9,922 | 1,283 | 237 | 596 | 22 | 5 | 251 | 481 | 36 | 25,634 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 17,125 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,125 |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | — | 679 | — | — | — | 2,372 | 545 | — | — | — | 3,596 |
Debt securities in issue | — | 224 | 681 | 766 | 226 | — | — | 800 | 700 | — | 3,397 |
Subordinated liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | 125 | — | 2,346 | 700 | 3,171 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | 10,286 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,286 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 2 | 7,827 | 751 | 597 | 304 | 1,121 | 461 | 733 | 969 | 1,078 | 13,843 |
Derivative financial instruments | 33,517 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33,517 |
Other financial liabilities | 49 | 208 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 34 | 5 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 341 |
Total financial liabilities | 56,655 | 35,985 | 2,718 | 1,603 | 1,127 | 3,549 | 1,141 | 1,798 | 4,508 | 1,826 | 110,910 |
Other liabilities | 303 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 111,213 | ||||||||||
Cumulative liquidity gap | 10,901 | 5,243 | 3,921 | 3,787 | 5,009 | 3,892 | 4,231 | 6,749 | 4,502 | 5,686 | 5,899 |
Contractual maturity of financial liabilities - undiscounted (audited) | |||||||||
On demand | Not more than three months | Over three months but not more than six months | Over six months but not more than one year | Over one year but not more than three years | Over three years but not more than five years | Over five years but not more than ten years | Over ten years | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||||||
Deposits at amortised cost | 10,167 | 14,344 | 2,872 | 1,337 | 281 | 84 | 484 | 25 | 29,594 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 24,712 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,712 |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | — | 941 | — | 1,000 | 1,061 | — | — | — | 3,002 |
Debt securities in issue | — | 400 | 760 | 492 | 897 | — | 898 | — | 3,447 |
Subordinated liabilities | — | — | — | — | 1,624 | 2,178 | 1,994 | — | 5,796 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | 12,872 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,872 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | — | 9,243 | 174 | 971 | 2,481 | 778 | 970 | 1,705 | 16,322 |
Derivative financial instruments | 32,493 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 32,494 |
Other financial liabilities | 29 | 388 | 3 | 7 | 34 | 22 | 16 | 14 | 513 |
Total financial liabilities | 55,561 | 50,028 | 3,809 | 3,807 | 6,379 | 3,062 | 4,362 | 1,744 | 128,752 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||||||
Deposits at amortised cost | 12,801 | 9,922 | 1,281 | 831 | 28 | 251 | 483 | 36 | 25,633 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | — | 17,122 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,122 |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | — | 679 | — | — | 2,917 | — | — | — | 3,596 |
Debt securities in issue | — | 224 | 679 | 989 | — | 821 | 737 | — | 3,450 |
Subordinated liabilities | — | — | — | — | 129 | — | 2,675 | 803 | 3,607 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | 10,286 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,286 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 2 | 7,821 | 750 | 897 | 1,576 | 741 | 959 | 1,673 | 14,419 |
Derivative financial instruments | 33,517 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33,517 |
Other financial liabilities | 49 | 208 | 3 | 7 | 42 | 13 | 15 | 14 | 351 |
Total financial liabilities | 56,655 | 35,976 | 2,713 | 2,724 | 4,692 | 1,826 | 4,869 | 2,526 | 111,981 |
Maturity analysis of off-balance sheet commitments given (audited) | |||||||||
On demand | Not more than three months | Over three months but not more than six months | Over six months but not more than one year | Over one year but not more than three years | Over three years but not more than five years | Over five years but not more than ten years | Over ten years | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||||||
Guarantees and letters of credit | 2,815 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,815 |
Other contingent liabilities | 1,956 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,956 |
Documentary credits | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 69 |
Commitments | 32,391 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32,391 |
Total off-balance sheet | 37,231 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37,231 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||||||
Guarantees and letters of credit | 2,519 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,519 |
Other contingent liabilities | 1,540 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,540 |
Documentary credits | 145 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 145 |
Commitments | 27,280 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,280 |
Total off-balance sheet | 31,484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31,484 |
Capital ratiosa,b | ||
As at 31 December | 2022 | 2021 |
CET1 | 16.7% | 16.1% |
Tier 1 (‘T1’) | 19.0% | 18.6% |
Total regulatory capital | 22.4% | 21.4% |
Capital resourcesb | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m |
CET1 capital | 5,887 | 5,182 |
T1 capital | 6,692 | 5,987 |
Total regulatory capital | 7,887 | 6,867 |
Total risk weighted assets (‘RWAs’)a | 35,216 | 32,120 |
Capital Requirements Regulation (‘CRR’) leverage ratioc | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m |
CRR leverage ratiob | 5.8% | 6.6% |
T1 capitalb | 6,605 | 5,935 |
CRR leverage exposure | 114,321 | 89,957 |
61% |
of the Bank’s net reportable operational risk events had a loss of €50,000 or less |
82% |
of events by number are due to Execution, Delivery and Process Management |
98% |
of losses are from events aligned to Execution, Delivery and Process Management |
Key: | Latest Year | Prior Year |
Table of Contents | |||
Page | Note | ||
n/a | |||
n/a | |||
n/a | |||
n/a | |||
n/a | |||
n/a | |||
1 | |||
Financial performance and return | 2 | ||
3 | |||
4 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
▪Tax | 9 | ||
10 | |||
11 | |||
12 | |||
13 | |||
14 | |||
15 | |||
16 | |||
17 | |||
18 | |||
19 | |||
20 | |||
21 | |||
22 | |||
23 | |||
24 | |||
25 | |||
26 | |||
27 | |||
28 | |||
29 | |||
30 | |||
31 | |||
32 | |||
33 | |||
34 | |||
35 | |||
36 | |||
▪Consolidated entities | 37 | ||
38 | |||
39 | |||
40 | |||
41 | |||
42 |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
Impairment allowances on loans and advances at amortised cost, including off-balance sheet elements 31 December 2022: €587m 31 December 2021: €477m Refer to note 8 (accounting policy) and Risk review pages 59 to 96 (financial disclosures) | Subjective estimate The estimation of expected credit losses (“ECL”) on financial instruments, involves significant judgement and estimates. The key areas where we identified greater levels of management judgement and therefore increased levels of audit focus in the Group’s estimation of ECLs are: •Model estimations; •Appropriateness of economic scenarios; and •Material qualitative adjustments. Model estimations Inherently judgemental modelling and assumptions are used to estimate ECL which involves determining Probabilities of Default (“PD”), Probabilities of Survival (“PS”), Loss Given Default (“LGD”), and Exposures at Default (“EAD”). ECLs may be inappropriate if certain models or underlying assumptions do not accurately predict defaults or recoveries over time, become out of line with wider industry experience, or fail to reflect the credit risk of financial assets. As a result, certain IFRS 9 models and model assumptions are the key drivers of complexity and uncertainty in the Group’s calculation of the ECL estimate. Economic scenarios Economic scenarios have a direct impact on the proportion of loans in stage 2 and the resultant ECL. Significant management judgement is applied to the determination of the economic scenarios and the weightings applied to them especially when considering the continued uncertain economic environment. | Our procedures included: Risk assessment: We performed granular and detailed risk assessment procedures over the entirety of the loan and advances at amortised cost including off-balance sheet elements within the Group’s financial statements. As part of these risk assessment procedures, we identified which portfolios are associated with a risk of material misstatement including those arising from significant judgements over the estimation of ECL either due to inputs, methods or assumptions. Controls testing: We performed end to end process walkthroughs to identify the key systems, applications and controls used in the ECL processes. We tested the relevant manual, general IT and application controls over key systems used in the ECL process. Key aspects of our controls testing involved evaluating the design and implementation and testing the operating effectiveness of the key controls over the: –completeness and accuracy of the key inputs into the IFRS 9 impairment models; –application of the staging criteria; –model validation, implementation and monitoring; –authorisation and calculation of post-model adjustments and management overlays; –selection and implementation of economic variables and the controls over the economic scenario selection and probabilities; and –calculation, review and approval of individually assessed impairments. Our testing of financial risk models: We involved our own financial risk modelling specialists who assisted in the following: –evaluating the Group’s IFRS 9 impairment methodologies; –inspecting model code for the calculation of certain components of the ECL model to assess its consistency with the Group’s model methodology; –evaluating for a selection of models which were changed or updated during the year as to whether the changes (including the updated model code) were appropriate by assessing the updated model methodology against the applicable accounting standard; –reperforming the calculation of certain adjustments to assess consistency with the qualitative adjustment methodologies; –assessing and reperforming for a selection of models, the reasonableness of the model predictions by comparing them against actual results and evaluating the resulting differences. –evaluating the model output for a selection of models by inspecting the corresponding model functionality and independently implementing the model by rebuilding the model code and comparing our independent output with management’s output; and –independently recalculating a selection of model assumptions using more recent data for certain portfolios. This is used to develop a range for ECL which is compared to management’s point estimate. |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
Material qualitative adjustments Adjustments to the model-driven ECL results are raised by management to address known impairment model limitations or emerging trends as well as risks not captured by models. Post-model adjustments (PMAs) represent approximately 6.5% net of the ECL, excluding model monitoring PMAs. These adjustments are inherently uncertain and significant management judgement is involved in estimating certain post model adjustments (“PMA’s”) and management overlays. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the impairment of loans and advances to customers including off balance sheet elements has a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole. The credit risk sections of the financial statements (pages 59 to 96) disclose the sensitivities estimated by the Group. Disclosure quality The disclosures regarding the Group’s application of IFRS 9 are key to explaining the key judgements and material inputs to the IFRS 9 ECL results. | Economic scenarios: We involved our own economic specialists to assist us in assessing: –assessing the reasonableness of the Group’s methodology and models for determining the economic scenarios used and the probability weightings applied to them; –reperforming the calculation of the probability weightings applied to economic scenarios and deriving an independent estimate of the scenario weightings using EU GDP and inflation variables; –assessing key economic variables which included comparing key economic variables to external sources; –assessing the overall reasonableness of the economic forecasts by comparing the Group’s forecasts to market consensus, where available, or to our own modelled forecasts; and –assessing the reasonableness of the Group’s qualitative adjustments by challenging key economic assumptions applied in their calculation using external sources. Tests of detail: Key other aspects of our substantive testing in addition to those set out above involved: –Sample testing over key inputs into ECL calculations to supporting documentation and market data, where available; and –Selecting a sample of post model adjustments, considering the size and complexity of management overlays, in order to assess the reasonableness of the adjustments by challenging judgements made in the adjustments to the model outputs, inspecting the calculation methodology and tracing a sample of the data used back to source documentation. –Selecting a sample of credit reviews in order to assess the reasonableness of customer risk ratings by challenging key judgements and considering disconfirming contradictory evidence. | |
Assessing transparency: We assessed whether the disclosures appropriately disclose and address the uncertainty which exists when determining the ECL. As a part of this, we assessed the sensitivity analysis disclosures. In addition, we assessed whether the disclosure of the key judgements and assumptions was sufficiently clear. Our results: We found the significant judgements used by management in determining the ECL charge, provision recognised and the related disclosures, application of PMAs and use of economic scenarios to be reasonable. |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
Valuation of financial instruments held at fair value – unobservable and complex pricing inputs Level 2 instruments*: 31 December 2022: €63,941 million assets €58,335 million liabilities 31 December 2021: €56,276 million assets €56,815, million liabilities Level 3 instruments: 31 December 2022: €893 million assets €478 million liabilities 31 December 2021: €535 million assets €58 million liabilities * The key audit matter identified relates to one derivative portfolio within this balance, and XVA adjustments made to derivative valuations, both of which we considered to be harder to value. Refer to note 15 (accounting policy and financial disclosures) | Subjective valuation The fair value of the Group’s financial instruments is determined through the application of valuation techniques which can involve the exercise of significant judgement by management in relation to the choice of the valuation models, pricing inputs and post-model pricing adjustments, including fair value adjustments (FVAs) and credit and funding adjustments (together referred to as XVAs). Where significant pricing inputs are unobservable, management has limited reliable, relevant market data available in determining the fair value and hence estimation uncertainty can be high. These financial instruments are classified as Level 3, with management having controls in place over the boundary between Level 2 and 3 positions. Our significant audit risk is therefore primarily over significant Level 3 portfolios. In addition, there may also be valuation complexity associated with Level 2 portfolios, specifically where valuation modelling techniques result in significant limitations or where there is greater uncertainty around the choice of an appropriate pricing methodology, and consequently more than one valuation methodology could be used for that product across the market. In the current year, we identified one portfolio of Level 2 derivatives which fell into this category (harder-to-value). The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the subjective estimates in fair value measurement of certain portfolios, and harder-to-value Level 2 portfolios have a high degree of estimation uncertainty, with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole. The financial statements (note 15) disclose the sensitivity estimated by the Group. Disclosure quality For the Level 3 portfolios, the disclosures are key to explaining the valuation techniques, key judgements, assumptions and material inputs. | Our procedures included: Risk assessment: We performed granular and detailed risk assessment procedures throughout the audit period over the entirety of the balances within the Group’s financial statements (i.e. all of the fair value financial instruments held by the Group). As part of these risk assessment procedures, we identified which portfolios and the associated valuation inputs have a risk of material misstatement including those arising from significant judgements over valuation either due to unobservable inputs or complex models. Control testing: We attended management’s valuation committee throughout the year and observed discussion and challenge over valuation themes including items related to the valuation of certain harder-to-value financial instruments recorded at fair value. We obtained an understanding and tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of key controls used in the valuations processes. We tested the design and operating effectiveness of key controls relating specifically to these portfolios. These included controls over: –independent price verification (‘IPV’), performed by a control function, of key market pricing inputs, including completeness of positions and valuation inputs subject to IPV, as well as controls over unobservable inputs which are not subject to price verification; –FVAs, including exit adjustments (to mark the portfolio to bid or offer prices), model shortcoming reserves to address model limitations and XVAs; –the validation, completeness, implementation and usage of significant valuation models. This included controls over assessment of model limitations and assumptions; and –the assessment of the observability of a product and their unobservable inputs. Independent re-performance: With the assistance of our own valuation specialists we: –independently re-priced a selection of trades and challenged management on the valuations where they were outside our tolerance; and –challenged the appropriateness of significant models and methodologies used in calculating fair values, risk exposures and in calculating FVAs, including comparison to industry practice. Seeking contradictory evidence: For a selection of collateral disputes identified through management’s control we challenged management’s valuation where significant fair value differences were observable with the market participant on the other side of the trade. We also utilised collateral dispute data to identify fair value financial instruments with significant fair value differences against market counter parties and selected these to independently reprice. Inspection of movements: We inspected trading revenue arising on Level 3 positions to assess whether material gains or losses generated were in line with the accounting standards. Historical comparison: We performed a retrospective review by inspecting significant gains and losses on a selection of new fair value financial instruments, position exits, novations and restructurings throughout the audit period and evaluated whether these data points indicated elements of fair value not incorporated in the current valuation methodologies. We also inspected movements in unobservable inputs throughout the period to challenge whether any gain or loss generated was appropriate. Assessing transparency: We assessed the adequacy of the Group’s financial statements disclosures in the context of the relevant accounting standards. Our results: We found the subjective assumptions made in respect of the fair value of Level 3 financial instruments and the modelling techniques associated with harder-to value Level 2 financial instruments to be reasonable. |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
Transfer pricing income arising from Platform Fee methodology recognised as Net fee and commission income (Service fees from affiliates) Refer to note 4 (accounting policy and financial disclosures) | The Group implemented a new Platform Fee transfer pricing arrangement (“Platform Fee”) to compensate the Group for the benefits derived by other Barclays entities from managing market risk in respect of Markets-based transactions for EEA domiciled customers. Management judgement was applied in developing the model and methodology for the new arrangement. The impact of this revised arrangement was to recognise an additional €43m income within Fee and Commission Income. The effect of these matters is that, as part of our risk assessment, we determined that the Platform Fee has a high degree of judgement, both from an accounting perspective and also from a pricing perspective (with a potential range of reasonable outcomes greater than our materiality for the financial statements as a whole). Note 4 of the financial statements disclose the financial impact. Disclosure quality The disclosures regarding the Group’s implementation of the platform fee are key to explaining the key judgement. | Our procedures included: Risk assessment: We performed granular and detailed risk assessment procedures throughout the audit period over the platform fee. We performed end to end process walkthroughs to identify the key systems, applications and controls used in the platform fee process. We evaluated the design and implementation of key controls relating to: –The review and approval of the model and methodology adopted by the Group; –Management review and approval of the Platform Fee implementation and governance; –The allocation of inputs into the Platform Fee transfer pricing model; and –The review and approval of data hand-ins to ensure completeness and accuracy; Use of transfer pricing specialists: We involved our own transfer pricing specialists to assist us in assessing the appropriateness of the Group’s methodology relating to the Platform Fee by challenging the benchmarking applied by the Group. Tests of detail: Key aspects of our testing in addition to those set out above involved: –Assessing the appropriateness of the key inputs into the Platform Fee model including checks to validate there is no double counting of key inputs; –Challenge of the appropriateness of the Platform Fee methodology in place to determine pricing including the judgements made and documentation prepared by Management with support from external experts, and considering the existence of alternative pricing approaches; –Challenge of the appropriateness of the accounting treatment for the Platform Fee in accordance with IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers including timing of initial recognition; and –Independent recalculation of the Platform fee. Assessing transparency: We challenged and assessed whether the disclosures appropriately disclose and were sufficiently clear in addressing the key judgement involved by Management when determining the platform fee. Our results: Using evidence obtained, we found the judgement used by management in determining the Platform Fee recognised during the year to be reasonable. |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter | |
User access management | User access management has a potential impact throughout the financial statements Control Performance Operations across several countries support a wide range of products and services resulting in a large and complex IT infrastructure. The financial reporting processes and related internal controls are highly dependent on this IT environment, both within Finance and the broader business and operations. User access management controls are an integral part of the IT environment to ensure both system access and changes made to systems and data are authorised and appropriate. Our audit approach relies on the effectiveness of IT access management controls. | Our procedures included: Control testing: We tested the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of automated controls that support material balances in the financial statements. We also tested the design and operating effectiveness of the relevant preventative and detective general IT controls over user access management including: –Authorising access rights for new joiners –Timely removal of user access rights –Logging and monitoring of user activities –Privileged user access management and monitoring –Developer access to transaction and balance information –Segregation of duties; and –Re-certification of user access rights. Our audit procedures identified deficiencies in certain IT access controls for systems relevant to financial reporting. More specifically, control deficiencies were identified around monitoring of activities performed by privileged users on a small percentage of infrastructure components. Management has ongoing programmes to remediate the deficiencies. Since these deficiencies were open during the year, we performed additional procedures to respond to the risk of unauthorised changes to automated controls over financial reporting. These procedures included conducting additional substantive procedures and where relevant, we determined whether compensating controls were effectively mitigating the identified deficiencies. Our results: Our testing did not identify unauthorised user activities relevant to financial reporting which would have required us to significantly expand the extent of our planned detailed testing. |
2022 | 2021a | ||
For the year ended 31 December | Notes | €m | €m |
Interest income | 3 | ||
Interest expense | 3 | ( | ( |
Net interest income | |||
Fee and commission incomea | 4 | ||
Fee and commission expensea | 4 | ( | ( |
Net fee and commission income | |||
Net trading income | 5 | ||
Net investment expense | 6 | ( | ( |
Total income | |||
Staff costs | 30 | ( | ( |
Infrastructure costs | 7 | ( | ( |
Administration and general expenses | 7 | ( | ( |
Litigation and conduct | ( | ||
Operating expenses | ( | ( | |
Profit before impairment | |||
Credit impairment (charges)/releases | 8 | ( | |
Profit before tax | |||
Taxation | 9 | ( | ( |
Profit after tax | |||
Attributable to: | |||
Ordinary shareholders | |||
Other equity instrument holders | |||
Profit after tax |
2022 | 2021 | |
For the year ended 31 December | €m | €m |
Profit after tax | ||
Other comprehensive loss that may be recycled to profit or loss from continuing operations | ||
Cash flow hedging reserve | ||
Net losses from changes in fair value | ( | ( |
Net gains transferred to profit and loss | ||
Tax | ||
Other comprehensive loss that may be recycled to profit or loss from continuing operations | ( | ( |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) not recycled to profit or loss from continuing operations: | ||
Retirement benefit measures | ||
Retirement benefit remeasurements | ||
Tax | ( | |
Own credit reserve | ||
Own credit | ( | |
Tax | ( | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss) not recycled to profit or loss | ( | |
Total comprehensive income for the year | ||
Attributable to: | ||
Ordinary shareholders | ( | |
Other equity instrument holders | ||
Total comprehensive income for the year |
2022 | 2021 | ||
As at 31 December | Notes | €m | €m |
Assets | |||
Cash and balances at central banks | |||
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 21 | ||
Loans and advances to banks | 17 | ||
Loans and advances to customers | 17 | ||
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | |||
Trading portfolio assets | 11 | ||
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 12 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 13 | ||
Intangible assets | 20 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 18 | ||
Current tax assets | |||
Deferred tax assets | 9 | ||
Retirement benefit assets | 32 | ||
Other assets | 22 | ||
Total assets | |||
Liabilities | |||
Deposits from banks | 17 | ||
Deposits from customers | 17 | ||
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 21 | ||
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 36 | ||
Debt securities in issue | |||
Subordinated liabilities | 27 | ||
Trading portfolio liabilities | 11 | ||
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 14 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 13 | ||
Current tax liabilities | |||
Deferred tax liabilities | 9 | ||
Retirement benefit obligation | 32 | ||
Other liabilities | 23 | ||
Provisions | 24 | ||
Total liabilities | |||
Equity | |||
Called up share capital and share premium | 28 | ||
Other equity instruments | 28 | ||
Other reserves | 29 | ( | ( |
Retained earnings | |||
Total equity | |||
Total liabilities and equity |
Tim Breedon CBE | Francesco Ceccato |
Chair | Chief Executive Officer |
Jasper Hanebuth | Francesca Carbonaro |
Chief Financial Officer | Company Secretary |
Called up share capital and share premiuma | Other equity instrumentsa | Other reservesb | Retained earnings | Total equity | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Balance as at 1 January 2022 | ( | ||||
Profit after tax | |||||
Cash flow hedges | ( | ( | |||
Retirement benefit remeasurement | |||||
Own credit reserve | |||||
Total comprehensive income for the year | ( | ||||
Issue of new ordinary shares | |||||
Other equity instruments coupons paid | ( | ( | |||
Other reserve movements | |||||
Balance as at 31 December 2022 | ( | ||||
Balance as at 1 January 2021 | ( | ||||
Profit after tax | |||||
Cash flow hedges | ( | ( | |||
Retirement benefit remeasurement | |||||
Own credit reserve | ( | ( | |||
Total comprehensive income for the year | ( | ||||
Issue of new ordinary shares | |||||
Issue of other equity instruments | |||||
Other equity instruments coupons paid | ( | ( | |||
Other reserve movements | ( | ( | |||
Balance as at 31 December 2021 | ( |
2022 | 2021 | ||
For the year ended 31 December | Notes | €m | €m |
Reconciliation of profit before tax to net cash flows from operating activities: | |||
Profit before tax | |||
Adjustment for non-cash items: | |||
Credit impairment charges/(releases) on financial instruments | ( | ||
Depreciation and amortisation of property, plant and equipment and intangibles | |||
Other provisions | |||
Other non-cash movements | ( | ( | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |||
Net decrease/(increase) in cash collateral and settlement balances | ( | ||
Net increase in loans and advances to banks and customers | ( | ( | |
Net decrease/(increase) in reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | ( | ||
Net decrease in trading assets and liabilities | |||
Net increase in financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value | ( | ( | |
Net increase in derivative financial instruments | ( | ( | |
Net increase in deposits and customer accounts | |||
Net (decrease)/increase in debt securities in issue | ( | ||
Net (decrease)/increase in repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | ( | ||
Net (increase)/decrease in other assets and liabilities | ( | ||
Corporate income tax paid | ( | ( | |
Net cash from operating activities | |||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and intangibles | ( | ( | |
Net cash from investing activities | ( | ( | |
Coupon payments on other equity instruments | ( | ( | |
Issuance of subordinated debt | 27 | ||
Redemption of subordinated debt | 27 | ( | |
Issue of shares and other equity instruments | |||
Lease liability payments | ( | ( | |
Net cash from financing activities | |||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | |||
Cash and cash equivalents comprise: | |||
Cash and balances at central banks | |||
Loans and advances to banks with original maturity less than three months | |||
This section describes the Bank’s significant policies and critical accounting estimates and judgements that relate to the financial statements and notes as a whole. If an accounting policy or a critical accounting estimate or judgement relates to a particular note, the accounting policy and/or critical accounting estimate/judgement is contained with the relevant note. |
1 Significant accounting policies |
1.Reporting entity of corporate and investment banking services to EU corporate entities, retail banking services in Germany and Italy and private banking services to EU clients. |
2. Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards The consolidated and company financial statements of the Bank have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) and interpretations (‘IFRICs’) issued by the Interpretations Committee, as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’) and endorsed by the EU. The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below, and in the relevant notes to the financial statements. These policies have been consistently applied. |
3. Basis of preparation The consolidated and company financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention modified to include the fair valuation of particular financial instruments, to the extent required or permitted under IFRS as adopted by the EU, as set out in the report, as the assets of the consolidated subsidiary entities were acquired from, and have not been derecognised by the parent, and the consolidated subsidiary entities' liabilities are to the parent in relation to the same assets. |
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, in accordance with the Companies Act 2014 as applicable to companies using IFRS, as adopted by the EU. The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, as the Board is satisfied that the Bank has the resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. In making this assessment, the Board has considered a wide range of information relating to present and future conditions. This involves an assessment of the future performance of the business to provide assurance that it has the resources in place that are required to meet its ongoing regulatory requirements. The assessment is based upon business plans which contain future forecasts of profitability taken from management’s three year medium term plan as well as projections of future regulatory capital requirements and business funding needs. This also includes details of the impact of internally generated stress testing scenarios on the liquidity and capital requirement forecasts. The stress tests used were based upon management’s assessment of reasonably possible economic scenarios that the Bank could experience. This assessment showed that the Bank had sufficient capital in place to support its future business requirements and remained above its regulatory minimum requirements in the stress test scenarios. It also showed that the Bank has an expectation that it can continue to meet its funding requirements during the scenarios. The Board concluded that there was a reasonable expectation that the Bank has adequate resources to continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future. The Board have evaluated these risks in the preparation of the financial statements and consider it appropriate to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis. |
4. Accounting policies The Bank prepares financial statements in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU. The Bank’s significant accounting policies relating to specific financial statement items, together with a description of the accounting estimates and judgements that were critical to preparing them, are set out under the relevant notes. Accounting policies that affect the financial statements as a whole are set out below. |
(i) Consolidation The Bank applies IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements combine the financial statements of the Bank and its subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are entities over which the Bank has control. The Bank has control over another entity when the Bank has all of the following: 1)power over the relevant activities of the investee, for example through voting or other rights 2)exposure to, or rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the investee and 3)the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. The assessment of control is based on the consideration of all facts and circumstances. The Bank reassesses whether it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Intra-group transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation. Consistent accounting policies are used throughout the Bank for the purposes of the consolidation. Details of the consolidated entities are given in Note 37. |
(ii) Foreign currency translation The Bank applies IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates. Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into Euro at the rate ruling on the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary balances are translated into Euro at the period end exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses on such balances are taken to the income statement. Non-monetary foreign currency balances in relation to items measured in terms of historical cost are carried at historical transaction date exchange rates. Non-monetary foreign currency balances in relation to items measured at fair value are translated using the exchange rate at the date when the fair value was measured. |
(iii) Financial assets and liabilities The Bank applies IFRS 9 Financial Instruments to the recognition, classification and measurement, and derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities and the impairment of financial assets. The Bank applies the requirements of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for hedge accounting purposes. |
Recognition The Bank recognises financial assets and liabilities when it becomes a party to the terms of the contract. Trade date or settlement date accounting is applied depending on the classification of the financial asset. |
Classification and measurement Financial assets are classified on the basis of two criteria: i) the business model within which financial assets are managed; and ii) their contractual cash flow characteristics (whether the cash flows represent ‘solely payments of principal and interest’ (‘SPPI’)). The Bank assesses the business model criteria at a portfolio level. Information that is considered in determining the applicable business model includes (i) policies and objectives for the relevant portfolio, (ii) how the performance and risks of the portfolio are managed, evaluated and reported to management, and (iii) the frequency, volume and timing of sales in prior periods, sales expectation for future periods, and the reasons for such sales. The contractual cash flow characteristics of financial assets are assessed with reference to whether the cash flows represent SPPI. In assessing whether contractual cash flows are SPPI compliant, interest is defined as consideration primarily for the time value of money and the credit risk of the principal outstanding. The time value of money is defined as the element of interest that provides consideration only for the passage of time and not consideration for other risks or costs associated with holding the financial asset. Terms that could change the contractual cash flows so that it would not meet the condition for SPPI are considered, including: (i) contingent and leverage features, (ii) non-recourse arrangements and (iii) features that could modify the time value of money. Financial assets will be measured at amortised cost if they are held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, and their contractual cash flows represent SPPI. Other financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss. There is an option to make an irrevocable election on initial recognition for non-traded equity investments to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, in which case dividends are recognised in profit or loss, but gains or losses are not reclassified to profit or loss upon derecognition, and the impairment requirements of IFRS 9 do not apply. The accounting policy for each type of financial asset or liability is included within the relevant note for the item. The Bank’s policies for determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities are set out in Note 15. |
Derecognition The Bank derecognises a financial asset, or a portion of a financial asset, from its balance sheet where (i) the contractual rights to cash flows from the asset have expired, or (ii) the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset have been transferred (usually by sale) and with them either (a) substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset have been transferred, or (b) where neither substantially all the risks and rewards have been transferred or retained, where control over the asset has been lost. Financial liabilities are de-recognised when the liability has been settled, has expired or has been extinguished. An exchange of an existing financial liability for a new liability with the same lender on substantially different terms – generally a difference of 10% in the present value of the cash flows or a substantive qualitative amendment – is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability. |
Accounting for reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements including other similar lending and borrowing Reverse repurchase agreements (and stock borrowing or similar transactions) are a form of secured lending whereby the Bank provides a loan or cash collateral in exchange for the transfer of collateral, generally in the form of marketable securities subject to an agreement to transfer the securities back at a fixed price in the future. Repurchase agreements are where the Bank obtains such loans or cash collateral, in exchange for the transfer of collateral. The Bank purchases (a reverse repurchase agreement) or borrows securities subject to a commitment to resell or return them. The securities are not included in the balance sheet as the Bank does not acquire the risks and rewards of ownership. Consideration paid (or cash collateral provided) is accounted for as a loan asset at amortised cost, unless it is designated at fair value through profit or loss. The Bank may also sell (a repurchase agreement) or lend securities subject to a commitment to repurchase or redeem them. The securities are retained on the balance sheet as the Bank retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. Consideration received (or cash collateral provided) is accounted for as a financial liability at amortised cost, unless it is designated at fair value through profit or loss. |
Accounting for cash collateral Cash collateral provided is accounted for as a loan asset at amortised cost, unless it is designated at fair value through profit or loss. Cash collateral received is accounted for as a financial liability at amortised cost, unless it is designated at fair value through profit or loss. |
(iv) Issued debt and equity instruments The Bank applies IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, to determine whether funding is either a financial liability (debt) or equity. Issued financial instruments or their components are classified as liabilities if the contractual arrangement results in the Bank having an obligation to either deliver cash or another financial asset, or a variable number of equity shares, to the holder of the instrument. If this is not the case, the instrument is generally an equity instrument and the proceeds included in equity, net of transaction costs. Ordinary dividends to equity holders are recognised when paid or declared by the members at the AGM and treated as a deduction from equity. Where issued financial instruments contain both liability and equity components, these are accounted for separately. The fair value of the debt is estimated first and the balance of the proceeds is included within equity. |
(v) Changes in the basis for determining contractual cash flows resulting from interest rate benchmark reform A change in the basis of determining the contractual cash flows of a financial instrument that are required by the interest rate benchmark reform is accounted for by updating the effective interest rate, without the recognition of an immediate gain or loss. This practical expedient is only applied where (1) the change to the contractual cash flows is necessary as a direct consequence of the reform and (2) the new basis for determining the contractual cash flows is economically equivalent to the previous basis. For changes made in addition to those required by the interest rate benchmark reform, the practical expedient is applied first, after which the normal IFRS 9 requirements for modifications of financial instruments is applied. Refer to Note 13 for further details regarding hedge accounting policies in respect of interest rate benchmark reform. Refer to Note 41 for further disclosure related to interest rate benchmark reform. |
(vi) Cash flow statement Cash comprises cash on hand and balances at central banks. Cash equivalents comprise loans and advances to banks and treasury and other eligible bills with original maturities of three months or less. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are not considered to |
5. New and amended standards and interpretations The accounting policies adopted have been consistently applied. |
Future accounting developments The following accounting standards have been issued by the IASB but are not yet effective: IFRS 17 – Insurance contracts In May 2017, the IASB issued IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, a comprehensive new accounting standard for insurance contracts covering recognition and measurement, presentation and disclosure. IFRS 17 will replace IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts that was issued in 2005. In June 2020, the IASB published amendments to IFRS 17, to include scope exclusion for certain credit card contracts and similar contracts that provide insurance coverage, the optional scope exclusion for loan contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, and the clarification that only financial guarantees issued are in scope of IFRS 9. IFRS 17 applies to all types of insurance contracts (i.e. life, non-life, direct insurance and re-insurance), regardless of the type of entities that issue them, as well as to certain guarantees and financial instruments with discretionary participation features. A few scope exceptions will apply. IFRS 17 is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. The Bank does not expect the impact of IFRS 17 to be material. |
Classification of liabilities as Current or non-current (Amendments to IAS 1) In January 2020 the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 to clarify the presentation of liabilities in the balance sheet, with an effective date of 1 January 2024. The amendments clarify that a liability should be classified as non-current only if the entity has the right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period, and that (i) the right to defer settlement must exist at the end of the reporting period and (ii) management’s intentions or expectations about whether it will exercise its right to defer settlement does not affect the classification. Further clarifications include how lending conditions affect classification and classification of liabilities the entity will or may settle by issuing its own equity instruments. In October 2022, the IASB also issued further amendments to IAS 1 to improve the information an entity provides when its right to defer settlement of a liability for at least twelve months is subject to compliance with covenants, and to respond to stakeholders’ concerns about the classification of such a liability as current or non-current. |
Disclosure of Accounting Policies - Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 In February 2021 the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 that require entities to disclose their material accounting policies rather than their significant accounting policies. The amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 provide guidance on the concept of materiality and its application to accounting policy information. Under the amendments, accounting policy information is material if, when considered together with other information included in an entity’s financial statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, and will be applied from that date. |
Definition of Accounting Estimate - Amendments to IAS 8 In February 2021 the IASB issued amendments to IAS 8 that replace the definition of a change in accounting estimates with a definition of accounting estimates. Under the new definition, accounting estimates are clarified as monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to measurement uncertainty. Where an entity's accounting policy requires an item to be measured at monetary amounts that cannot be observed directly, it should develop an accounting estimate to achieve this objective. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, and will be applied from that date. |
6. Critical accounting estimates and judgements The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgement in applying the accounting policies. The key areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity or areas where assumptions are significant to the Bank’s financial statements are highlighted under the relevant note. Critical accounting estimates and judgements are disclosed in: •Credit impairment charges on page 144 •Tax on page 148 •Fair value of financial instruments on page 159 |
7. Other disclosures To improve transparency and ease of reference, by concentrating related information in one place, certain disclosures required under IFRS have been included within the Risk review section as follows: •Credit risk on pages 59 to 96 •Market risk on pages 97 to 98 •Treasury and capital risk on pages 99 to 106 These disclosures are covered by the Audit opinion (included on pages 119 to 128) where referenced as audited. |
The notes included in this section focus on the results and performance of the Bank. Information on the income generated, expenditure incurred, segmental performance, tax and dividends are included here. For further detail on performance, see Strategic Report on pages 6 to 7. |
Presentation of segmental reporting The Bank’s segmental reporting is in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments. Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Bank’s Executive Committee, which is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, and has been identified as the chief operating decision maker. All transactions between business segments are conducted on an arm’s-length basis, with intra-segment revenue and costs being eliminated in Head Office. Income and expenses directly associated with each segment are included in determining business segment performance. |
Analysis of results by business | ||||
CIB | CC&P | Head Office | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
For the year ended 31 December 2022 | ||||
Net interest income/(expense) | 102 | 323 | (105) | 320 |
Other income | 1,015 | 45 | 50 | 1,110 |
Total income | 1,117 | 368 | (55) | 1,430 |
Operating costs | (813) | (242) | (51) | (1,106) |
Profit/(loss) before impairment | 304 | 126 | (106) | 324 |
Credit impairment (charges)/releases | (34) | (134) | 1 | (167) |
Profit/(loss) before tax | 270 | (8) | (105) | 157 |
Total assets (€bn) | 89 | 5 | 39 | 133 |
Total liabilities (€bn) | 106 | 6 | 14 | 126 |
Number of employees (full time equivalent) | 593 | 710 | 473 | 1,776 |
CIB | CC&P | Head Office | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
For the year ended 31 December 2021 | ||||
Net interest income/(expense) | 60 | 305 | (53) | 312 |
Other income | 803 | 34 | 47 | 884 |
Total income | 863 | 339 | (6) | 1,196 |
Operating costs | (673) | (236) | (59) | (968) |
Profit/(loss) before impairment | 190 | 103 | (65) | 228 |
Credit impairment releases | 64 | 24 | 9 | 97 |
Profit/(loss) before tax | 254 | 127 | (56) | 325 |
Total assets (€bn) | 80 | 4 | 33 | 117 |
Total liabilities (€bn) | 92 | 4 | 15 | 111 |
Number of employees (full time equivalent) | 582 | 698 | 428 | 1,708 |
Income by geographic regiona | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
For the year ended 31 December | €m | €m |
Ireland | 271 | 186 |
Germany | 494 | 466 |
Italy | 204 | 84 |
France | 328 | 313 |
Spain | 78 | 87 |
Netherlands | 17 | 17 |
Sweden | 17 | 35 |
Rest of Europeb | 21 | 8 |
Total | 1,430 | 1,196 |
Accounting for interest income and expenses Interest income on loans and advances at amortised cost, and interest expense on financial liabilities held at amortised cost, are calculated using the effective interest method which allocates interest, and direct and incremental fees and costs, over the expected lives of the assets and liabilities. The effective interest method requires the Bank to estimate future cash flows, in some cases based on its experience of customers’ behaviour, considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument, as well as the expected lives of the assets and liabilities. The Bank incurs certain costs to originate credit card balances and personal loans. To the extent these costs are attributed to customers that continuously carry an outstanding balance (revolver) and incremental to the origination of credit card balances, they are capitalised and subsequently included within the calculation of the effective interest rate. They are amortised to interest income over the period of the expected repayment of the originated balance. There are no other individual estimates involved in the calculation of effective interest rates that are material to the results or financial position. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Interest and similar income | ||
Cash and balances at central banks | 101 | — |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 522 | 426 |
Negative interest on liabilities | 96 | 151 |
Other | 62 | 44 |
781 | 621 | |
Interest and similar expense | ||
Deposits at amortised cost | (193) | (59) |
Debt securities in issue | (14) | (18) |
Subordinated liabilities | (65) | (33) |
Negative interest on assets | (102) | (156) |
Other | (87) | (43) |
(461) | (309) | |
Net interest income | 320 | 312 |
Accounting for net fee and commission income under IFRS 15 The Bank applies IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. IFRS 15 establishes a five-step model governing revenue recognition. The five-step model requires the Bank to (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify each of the performance obligations included in the contract, (iii) determine the amount of consideration in the contract, (iv) allocate the consideration to each of the identified performance obligations and (v) recognise revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. The Bank recognises fee and commission income charged for services provided by the Bank as and when performance obligations are satisfied, for example, on completion of the underlying transaction. Where the contractual arrangements also result in the Bank recognising financial instruments in scope of IFRS 9, such financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value in accordance with IFRS 9 before applying the provisions of IFRS 15. |
2022 | Corporate and Investment Bank | Consumer, Cards and Payments | Head Office | Total |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Fee type | ||||
Transactional | 55 | 44 | — | 99 |
Advisory | 120 | 8 | — | 128 |
Brokerage and execution | 39 | 1 | — | 40 |
Underwriting and syndication | 182 | — | — | 182 |
Service fees from affiliates | 173 | — | — | 173 |
Other | 20 | 7 | 19 | 46 |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 589 | 60 | 19 | 668 |
Other non-contract fee income | 344 | — | — | 344 |
Fee and commission income | 933 | 60 | 19 | 1,012 |
Fee and commission expense-non affiliates | (38) | (21) | — | (59) |
Fee and commission expense-affiliates | (24) | — | — | (24) |
Fee and commission expense | (62) | (21) | — | (83) |
Net fee and commission income | 871 | 39 | 19 | 929 |
2021 | Corporate and Investment Bank | Consumer, Cards and Payments | Head Office | Total |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Fee type | ||||
Transactional | 45 | 34 | — | 79 |
Advisory | 92 | 7 | — | 99 |
Brokerage and execution | 32 | 1 | — | 33 |
Underwriting and syndication | 212 | — | — | 212 |
Service fees from affiliates | 196 | — | — | 196 |
Other | 13 | 7 | 17 | 37 |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 590 | 49 | 17 | 656 |
Other non-contract fee income | 186 | — | — | 186 |
Fee and commission incomea | 776 | 49 | 17 | 842 |
Fee and commission expense-non affiliates | (34) | (17) | (1) | (52) |
Fee and commission expense-affiliates | (19) | — | — | (19) |
Fee and commission expensea | (53) | (17) | (1) | (71) |
Net fee and commission income | 723 | 32 | 16 | 771 |
Accounting for net trading income In accordance with IFRS 9, trading positions are held at fair value, and the resulting gains and losses are included in net trading income, together with interest and dividends arising from long and short positions and funding costs relating to trading activities. Income arises from both the sale and purchase of trading positions, margins which are achieved through market making and customer business and from changes in fair value caused by movements in interest and exchange rates. |
Gains or losses on non-trading financial instruments designated or mandatorily at fair value with changes in fair value recognised in the income statement are included in net trading income where the business model is to manage assets and liabilities on a fair value basis which includes use of derivatives or where an instrument is designated at fair value to eliminate an accounting mismatch and the related instrument's gain and losses are reported in net trading income. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Net gains from assets and liabilities held for tradinga | 189 | 139 |
Net gains on financial instruments mandatorily at fair value | 29 | 13 |
Net trading income | 218 | 152 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Net losses on other investments | (53) | (44) |
Net gains from disposal of financial assets and liabilities measured at amortised cost | — | 1 |
Net gains from financial assets mandatorily at fair value | 16 | 4 |
Net investment expense | (37) | (39) |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Infrastructure costs | ||
Property and equipment | 40 | 38 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 42 | 35 |
Total infrastructure costs | 82 | 73 |
Administration and general expenses | ||
Consultancy, legal and professional fees | 29 | 29 |
Marketing and advertising | 20 | 18 |
Other administration and general expensesa | 534 | 440 |
Total administration and general expenses | 583 | 487 |
Staff costs (See Note 30) | 441 | 399 |
Provisions for litigation and conduct (See Note 24) | — | 9 |
Operating expenses | 1,106 | 968 |
Accounting for the impairment of financial assets Impairment In accordance with IFRS 9, the Bank is required to recognise expected credit losses (‘ECLs’) based on unbiased forward-looking information for all financial assets at amortised cost, lease receivables, loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts. At the reporting date, an allowance (or provision for loan commitments and financial guarantees) is required for the 12 month (Stage 1) ECLs. If the credit risk has significantly increased since initial recognition (Stage 2), or if the financial instrument is credit impaired (Stage 3), an allowance (or provision) should be recognised for the lifetime ECLs. The measurement of ECL is calculated using three main components: (i) probability of default (‘PD’) (ii) loss given default (‘LGD’) and (iii) the exposure at default (‘EAD’). The 12 month ECL and lifetime ECLs are calculated by multiplying the respective PD, LGD and the EAD. The 12 month and lifetime PDs represent the PD occurring over the next 12 months and the remaining maturity of the instrument respectively. The EAD represents the expected balance at default, taking into account the repayment of principal and interest from the balance sheet date to the default event together with any expected drawdowns of committed facilities. The LGD represents expected losses on the EAD given the event of default, taking into account, among other attributes, the mitigating effect of collateral value at the time it is expected to be realised and the time value of money. Expected credit loss measurement is based on the ability of borrowers to make payments as they fall due. The Bank also considers sector specific risks and whether additional adjustments are required in the measurement of ECL. Credit risk may be impacted by climate considerations for certain sectors, such as oil and gas. To determine if there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, the Bank assesses when a significant increase in credit risk has occurred based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. The credit risk of an exposure is considered to have significantly increased when: i)Quantitative test The annualised lifetime PD has increased by more than an agreed threshold relative to the equivalent at origination. PD deterioration thresholds are defined as percentage increases, and are set at an origination score band and segment level to ensure the test appropriately captures significant increases in credit risk at all risk levels. Generally, thresholds are inversely correlated to the origination PD, i.e. as the origination PD increases, the threshold value reduces. The assessment of the point at which a PD increase is deemed ‘significant’, is based upon analysis of the portfolio’s risk profile against a common set of principles and performance metrics (consistent across both retail and wholesale businesses), incorporating expert credit judgement where appropriate. Application of quantitative PD floors does not represent the use of the low credit risk exemption as exposures can separately move into stage 2 via the qualitative route described below. Wholesale assets apply a 100% increase in PD and 0.2% PD floor to determine a significant increase in credit risk. Retail assets apply bespoke relative increase and absolute PD thresholds based on product type and origination PD. Thresholds are subject to maximums defined by the Bank’s policy and a maximum relative threshold of 400%. For existing/historical exposures where origination point scores or data are no longer available or do not represent a comparable estimate of lifetime PD, a proxy origination score is defined, based upon: ▪Back-population of the approved lifetime PD score either to origination date or, where this is not feasible, as far back as possible, (subject to a data start point no later than 1 January 2015); or ▪Use of available historical account performance data and other customer information, to derive a comparable ‘proxy’ estimation of origination PD. |
ii)Qualitative test This is relevant for accounts that meet the portfolio’s ‘high risk’ criteria and are subject to closer credit monitoring. High risk customers may not be in arrears but either through an event or an observed behaviour exhibit credit distress. The definition and assessment of high risk includes as wide a range of information as reasonably available, including industry and Group wide customer level data wherever possible or relevant. Whilst the high risk populations applied for IFRS 9 impairment purposes are aligned with risk management processes, they are also regularly reviewed and validated to ensure that they capture any incremental segments where there is evidence of credit deterioration. |
iii)Backstop criteria This is relevant for accounts that are more than 30 calendar days past due. The 30 days past due criteria is a backstop rather than a primary driver of moving exposures into Stage 2. Exposures will move back to Stage 1 once they no longer meet the criteria for a significant increase in credit risk. This means that, at minimum: all payments must be up-to-date, the PD deterioration test is no longer met, the account is no longer classified as high risk, and the customer has evidenced an ability to maintain future payments. Exposures are only removed from stage 3 and re-assigned to stage 2 once the original default trigger event no longer applies. Exposures being removed from stage 3 must no longer qualify as credit impaired, and: a)the obligor will also have demonstrated consistently good payment behaviour over a 12-month period, by making all consecutive contractual payments due and, for forborne exposures, the relevant EBA defined probationary period has also been successfully completed; or b)(for non-forborne exposures) the performance conditions are defined and approved within an appropriately sanctioned restructure plan, including 12 months’ payment history have been met. Management overlays and other exceptions to model outputs are applied only if consistent with the objective of identifying significant increases in credit risk. |
Forward-looking information The measurement of ECL involves complexity and judgement, including estimation of PD, LGD, a range of unbiased future economic scenarios, estimation of expected lives (where contractual life is not appropriate), and estimation of EAD and assessing significant increases in credit risk. Credit losses are the expected cash shortfalls from what is contractually due over the expected life of the financial instrument, discounted at the original effective interest rate (‘EIR’). ECLs are the unbiased probability-weighted credit losses determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes and considering future economic conditions. The Bank uses a five-scenario model to calculate ECL. An external consensus forecast is assembled from key sources, including Bloomberg (based on median of economic forecasts), which forms the Baseline scenario. In addition, two adverse scenarios (Downside 1 and Downside 2) and two favourable scenarios (Upside 1 and Upside 2) are derived, with associated probability weightings. The adverse scenarios are calibrated to a broadly similar severity to Barclays’ internal stress tests and stress scenarios provided by regulators whilst also considering IFRS 9 specific sensitivities and non-linearity. The favourable scenarios are designed to reflect plausible upside risks to the Baseline scenario which are broadly consistent with the economic narrative approved by the Senior Scenario Review Committee. All scenarios are regenerated at a minimum semi-annually. The scenarios include both key economic variables, (including GDP, unemployment, House Price Index (HPI) and base rates), and expanded variables using statistical models based on historical correlations. The upside and downside shocks are designed to evolve over a five-year stress horizon, with all five scenarios converging to a steady state after approximately seven years. The methodology for estimating scenario probability weights involves simulating a range of future paths for GDP using historical data with the five scenarios mapped against the distribution of these future paths. The median is centred around the Baseline with scenarios further from the Baseline attracting a lower weighting before the five weights are normalised to total 100%. The same scenarios used in the estimation of expected credit losses are also used to inform the Bank’s internal planning. The impacts across the portfolios are different because of the sensitivities of each of the portfolios to specific macroeconomic variables, for example, mortgages are highly sensitive to house prices, credit cards and unsecured consumer loans are highly sensitive to unemployment. The increase in the Downside weightings and the decrease in the Upside weightings reflected the deteriorating economic outlook which moved the Baseline GDP paths closer to the Downside scenarios. For further details see page 74. |
Definition of default, credit impaired assets, write-offs, and interest income recognition The definition of default for the purpose of determining ECLs, and for internal credit risk management purposes, has been aligned to the Regulatory Capital CRR Article 178 definition of default, to maintain a consistent approach with IFRS 9 and associated regulatory guidance. The Regulatory Capital CRR Article 178 definition of default considers indicators that the debtor is unlikely to pay and is no later than when the exposure is more than 90 days past due. When exposures are identified as credit impaired at the time when they are purchased or originated as such interest income is calculated on the carrying value net of the impairment allowance. An asset is considered credit impaired when one or more events occur that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset. This comprises assets defined as defaulted and other individually assessed exposures where imminent default or actual loss is identified. Uncollectible loans are written off against the related allowance for loan impairment on completion of the Bank’s internal processes and when all reasonably expected recoverable amounts have been collected. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited to the income statement. The timing and extent of write-offs may involve some element of subjective judgement. Nevertheless, a write-off will often be prompted by a specific event, such as the inception of insolvency proceedings or other formal recovery action, which makes it possible to establish that some or the entire advance is beyond realistic prospect of recovery. |
Accounting for purchased financial guarantee contracts The Bank may enter into a financial guarantee contract which requires the issuer of such contract to reimburse the Bank for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the terms of a debt instrument. For these separate financial guarantee contracts, the Bank recognises a reimbursement asset aligned with the recognition of the underlying ECLs, if it is considered virtually certain that a reimbursement would be received if the specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the terms of the debt instrument. |
Loan modifications and renegotiations that are not credit-impaired When modification of a loan agreement occurs as a result of commercial restructuring activity rather than due to the credit risk of the borrower, an assessment must be performed to determine whether the terms of the new agreement are substantially different from the terms of the existing agreement. This assessment considers both the change in cash flows arising from the modified terms as well as the change in overall instrument risk profile. In respect of payment holidays granted to borrowers which are not due to forbearance, if the revised cash flows on a present value basis (based on the original EIR) are not substantially different from the original cash flows, the loan is not considered to be substantially modified. Where terms are substantially different, the existing loan will be derecognised and new loan recognised at fair value, with any difference in valuation recognised immediately within the income statement, subject to observability criteria. Where terms are not substantially different, the loan carrying value will be adjusted to reflect the present value of modified cash flows discounted at the original EIR, with any resulting gain or loss recognised immediately within the income statement as a modification gain or loss. Note 1 sets out details for changes in the basis of determining the contractual cash flows of a financial instrument that are required by interest rate benchmark reform. |
Expected life Lifetime ECLs must be measured over the expected life. This is restricted to the maximum contractual life and takes into account expected prepayment, extension, call and similar options. The exceptions are certain revolving financial instruments, such as credit cards and bank overdrafts, that include both a drawn and an undrawn component where the entity’s contractual ability to demand repayment and cancel the undrawn commitment does not limit the entity’s exposure to credit losses to the contractual notice period. For revolving facilities, expected life is analytically derived to reflect the behavioural life of the asset, i.e. the full period over which the business expects to be exposed to credit risk. Behavioural life is typically based upon historical analysis of the average time to default, closure or withdrawal of facility. Where data is insufficient or analysis inconclusive, an additional ‘maturity factor’ may be incorporated to reflect the full estimated life of the exposures, based upon experienced judgement and/or peer analysis. Potential future modifications of contracts are not taken into account when determining the expected life or EAD until they occur. |
Discounting ECLs are discounted at the EIR at initial recognition or an approximation thereof and consistent with income recognition. For loan commitments the EIR is the rate that is expected to apply when the loan is drawn down and a financial asset is recognised. For variable/ floating rate financial assets, the spot rate at the reporting date is used and projections of changes in the variable rate over the expected life are not made to estimate future interest cash flows or for discounting. |
Modelling techniques The regulatory Basel Committee of Banking Supervisors (‘BCBS’) ECL calculations are leveraged for IFRS 9 modelling but adjusted for key differences which include: ▪BCBS requires 12 month through the economic cycle losses whereas IFRS 9 requires 12 months or lifetime point in time losses based on conditions at the reporting date and multiple forecasts of the future economic conditions over the expected lives; ▪IFRS 9 models do not include certain conservative BCBS model floors and downturn assessments and require discounting to the reporting date at the original EIR rather than using the cost of capital to the date of default; ▪Management adjustments are made to modelled output to account for situations where known or expected risk factors and information have not been considered in the modelling process, for example forecast economic scenarios for uncertain political events; and ▪ECL is measured at the individual financial instrument level, however a collective approach where financial instruments with similar risk characteristics are grouped together, with apportionment to individual financial instruments, is used where effects can only be seen at a collective level, for example for forward-looking information. For the IFRS 9 impairment assessment, the Bank’s risk models are used to determine the PD, LGD and EAD. For Stage 2 and 3, the Bank applies lifetime PDs but uses 12 month PDs for Stage 1. The ECL drivers of PD, EAD and LGD are modelled at an account level which considers vintage, among other credit factors. Also, the assessment of significant increase in credit risk is based on the initial lifetime PD curve, which accounts for the different credit risk underwritten over time. |
Forbearance A financial asset is subject to forbearance when it is modified due to the credit distress of the borrower. A modification made to the terms of an asset due to forbearance will typically be assessed as a non-substantial modification that does not result in derecognition of the original loan, except in circumstances where debt is exchanged for equity. Both performing and non-performing forbearance assets are classified as Stage 3 except where it is established that the concession granted has not resulted in diminished financial obligation and that no other regulatory definitions of default criteria have been triggered, in which case the asset is classified as Stage 2. The minimum probationary period for non-performing forbearance is 12 months and for performing forbearance, 24 months. Hence, a minimum of 36 months is required for non-performing forbearance to move out of a forborne state. No financial instrument in forbearance can transfer back to Stage 1 until all of the Stage 2 thresholds are no longer met and can only move out of Stage 3 when no longer credit impaired. |
Critical accounting estimates and judgements IFRS 9 impairment involves several important areas of judgement, including estimating forward looking modelled parameters (PD, LGD and EAD), developing a range of unbiased future economic scenarios, estimating expected lives and assessing significant increases in credit risk. The calculation of impairment involves the use of judgement, based on the Bank’s experience of managing credit risk. Within the retail portfolios, which comprise large numbers of small homogenous assets with similar risk characteristics, the impairment allowance is calculated using forward looking modelled parameters which are typically run at account and portfolio level. There are many models in use, each tailored to a product, line of business or customer category. Judgement and knowledge is needed in selecting the statistical methods to use when the models are developed or revised. Management adjustments to impairment models, which contain an element of subjectivity, are applied in order to factor in certain conditions or changes in policy that are not fully incorporated into the impairment models, or to reflect additional facts and circumstances at the period end. Management adjustments are reviewed and incorporated into future model development where appropriate. For individually significant assets in Stage 3, impairment allowances are calculated on an individual basis and all relevant considerations that have a bearing on the expected future cash flows across a range of economic scenarios are taken into account. These considerations can be particularly subjective and can include the business prospects for the customer, the realisable value of collateral, the Bank’s position relative to other claimants, the reliability of customer information and the likely cost and duration of the work-out process. The level of the impairment allowance is the difference between the value of the discounted expected future cash flows (discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate), and its carrying amount. Furthermore, judgements change with time as new information becomes available or as work-out strategies evolve, resulting in frequent revisions to the impairment allowance as individual decisions are taken. Changes in these estimates would result in a change in the allowances and have a direct impact on the impairment charge. Temporary adjustments to calculated IFRS9 impairment allowances may be applied in limited circumstances to account for situations where known or expected risk factors or information have not been considered in the ECL assessment or modelling process. For further information please see page 59 in credit risk performance. Information about the potential impact of the physical and transition risks of climate change on borrowers is considered, taking into account reasonable and supportable information to make accounting judgements and estimates. Climate change is inherently of a long- term nature, with significant levels of uncertainty, and consequently requires judgement in determining the possible impact in the next financial year, if any. |
2022 | 2021 | |||||
Impairment Charges/ (Releases) | Recoveries and reimburse- mentsa | Total | Impairment Charges/ (Releases) | Recoveries and reimburse- ments | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 174 | (27) | 147 | (77) | 15 | (62) |
Off-balance sheet loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts | 20 | — | 20 | (29) | — | (29) |
Total | 194 | (27) | 167 | (106) | 15 | (91) |
Other assets | — | — | — | (6) | — | (6) |
Credit impairment charges/(releases) | 194 | (27) | 167 | (112) | 15 | (97) |
Accounting for income taxes The Bank applies IAS 12 Income Taxes in accounting for taxes on income. Income tax payable on taxable profits (current tax) is recognised as an expense in the periods in which the profits arise. Withholding taxes are also treated as income taxes. Income tax recoverable on tax allowable losses is recognised as a current tax asset only to the extent that it is regarded as recoverable by offsetting against taxable profits arising in the current or prior periods. Current tax is measured using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. |
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except from the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is not recognised where the temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates and legislation enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date which are expected to apply when the deferred tax asset is realised or the deferred tax liability is settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset when there is both a legal right to set-off and an |
The Bank considers an uncertain tax position to exist when it considers that ultimately, in the future, the amount of profit subject to tax may be greater than the amount initially reflected in the Bank’s tax returns. A current tax provision is recognised when it is considered probable that the outcome of a review by a tax authority of an uncertain tax position will alter the amount of cash tax due to, or from, a tax authority in the future. From recognition, the current tax provision is then measured at the amount the Bank ultimately expects to pay the tax authority to resolve the position. |
Critical accounting estimates and judgements The main areas of judgement that impacts the reported tax position is the recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets, and the level of provisioning for uncertain tax positions. The Bank does not consider there to be a significant risk of a material adjustment to the carrying amount of current and deferred tax balances, including the provisions for uncertain tax positions in the next financial year. The provisions for uncertain tax positions cover a range of issues and reflect advice from external counsel where relevant. It should be noted that only a proportion of the total uncertain tax positions will be under audit at any point in time, and could therefore be subject to challenge by a tax authority over the next year. Deferred tax assets have been recognised based on business profit forecasts. Details on the recognition of deferred tax assets are provided in this note. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Current tax charge | ||
Current year | 63 | 59 |
Adjustment in respect of prior years | 8 | 12 |
71 | 71 | |
Deferred tax charge/(credit) | ||
Current year | (34) | 20 |
Adjustment in respect of prior years | 20 | (1) |
(14) | 19 | |
Tax charge | 57 | 90 |
2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2021 | |
€m | % | €m | % | |
Profit before tax | 157 | 325 | ||
Tax charge based on the standard Ireland corporation tax rate of 12.5% (2021: 12.5%) | 20 | 12.5% | 41 | 12.5% |
Impact of profits/losses earned in territories with different statutory rates to Ireland (weighted average statutory tax rate including in respect of Ireland is 46.9% (2021: 25.8%)) | 54 | 34.4% | 43 | 13.3% |
Adjustments in respect of prior years | 28 | 17.9% | 11 | 3.4% |
Non-deductible expenses and other tax adjustments | 5 | 3.2% | 24 | 7.4% |
Tax relief on payments made under AT1 instruments | (6) | (3.8%) | (5) | (1.5%) |
Changes in recognition of deferred tax and unrecognised tax losses | (44) | (27.9%) | (24) | (7.4%) |
Total tax charge | 57 | 36.3% | 90 | 27.7% |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Spain | 79 | 71 |
Germany | 78 | 69 |
Ireland | 32 | 22 |
France | 17 | 16 |
Deferred tax asset | 206 | 178 |
Deferred tax liability - Ireland | (1) | — |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities | |||||
Loan impairment allowance | Retirement benefit obligations | Other temporary differencesa | Tax losses carried forward | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 1 January 2022 | 62 | 13 | 32 | 71 | 178 |
Income statement | 23 | — | (14) | 5 | 14 |
Other comprehensive income and reserves | (2) | 10 | — | 8 | |
Other movements | — | — | 5 | — | 5 |
85 | 11 | 33 | 76 | 205 | |
Assets | 85 | 12 | 33 | 76 | 206 |
Liabilities | — | (1) | — | — | (1) |
As at 31 December, 2022 | 85 | 11 | 33 | 76 | 205 |
As at 1 January 2021 | 86 | 15 | 14 | 73 | 188 |
Income statement | (24) | (2) | 9 | (2) | (19) |
Other comprehensive income and reserves | — | — | 9 | — | 9 |
62 | 13 | 32 | 71 | 178 | |
Assets | 62 | 13 | 32 | 71 | 178 |
Liabilities | — | — | — | — | — |
As at 31 December, 2021 | 62 | 13 | 32 | 71 | 178 |
The notes included in this section focus on assets and liabilities the Bank holds and recognises at fair value. Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, which may be an observable market price or, where there is no quoted price for the instrument, may be an estimate based on available market data. Detail regarding the Bank’s approach to managing market risk can be found on page 52. |
Accounting for trading portfolio assets and liabilities In accordance with IFRS 9, all assets and liabilities held for trading purposes are held at fair value with gains and losses in the changes in fair value taken to the income statement in net trading income (Note 5). |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Debt securities and other eligible bills | 7,307 | 7,423 |
Equity securities | 138 | 143 |
Traded loans | 255 | 638 |
Trading portfolio assets | 7,700 | 8,204 |
Debt securities and other eligible bills | (12,872) | (10,286) |
Trading portfolio liabilities | (12,872) | (10,286) |
Accounting for financial assets mandatorily at fair value Financial assets are held at fair value through profit or loss if they do not contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are SPPI, or if the financial asset is not held in a business model that is either (i) a business model to collect the contractual cash flows or (ii) a business model that is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling. Subsequent changes in fair value for these instruments are recognised in the income statement in net investment expense, except if reporting it in trading income reduces an accounting mismatch. The details on how the fair value amounts are derived for financial assets at fair value are described in Note 15. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Loans and advances | 1,767 | 726 |
Debt securities | 24 | 24 |
Equity securities | 2 | 1 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 15,423 | 14,601 |
Financial assets mandatorily at fair value | 17,216 | 15,352 |
Accounting for derivatives Derivative instruments are contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial instruments or indices defined in the contract. They include swaps, forward-rate agreements, futures, options and combinations of these instruments and primarily affect the Bank’s net interest income, net trading income and derivative assets and liabilities. Notional amounts of the contracts are not recorded on the balance sheet. Derivatives are used to hedge interest rate risk. All derivative instruments are held at fair value through profit or loss, except for derivatives that are in a designated cash flow hedge accounting relationship. Derivatives are classified as assets when their fair value is positive or as liabilities when their fair value is negative. This includes terms included in a contract or financial liability (the host), which, had it been a standalone contract, would have met the definition of a derivative. If these are separated from the host, i.e. when the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are not closely related with those of the host contract and the combined instrument is not measured at fair value through profit or loss, then they |
Hedge Accounting The Bank applies the requirements of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for hedge accounting purposes. The Bank applies hedge accounting to represent, the economic effects of its interest rate risk management strategy. Where derivatives are held for risk management purposes, and when transactions meet the required criteria for documentation and hedge effectiveness, the Bank applies fair value hedge accounting or cash flow hedge accounting as appropriate to the risks being hedged. The Bank applies the ‘Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7 Interest Rate Benchmark Reform’ issued in September 2019 (the Phase 1 amendments). The amendments provide temporary relief from applying specific hedge accounting requirements to hedging relationships directly affected by IBOR (‘Interbank Offered Rates’) reform. The reliefs have the effect that IBOR reform should not generally cause hedge accounting to terminate. However, any hedge ineffectiveness continues to be recorded in the income statement. Furthermore, the amendments set out triggers for when the reliefs will end, which include the uncertainty arising from interest rate benchmark reform no longer being present. In summary, the reliefs provided by the Phase 1 amendments are: ▪When considering the ‘highly probable’ requirement, the Bank has assumed that the IBOR interest rates upon which our hedged items are based do not change as a result of IBOR Reform. ▪In assessing whether the hedge is expected to be highly effective on a forward-looking basis the Bank has assumed that the IBOR interest rates upon which the cash flows of the hedged items and the interest rate swaps that hedge them are based are not altered by IBOR reform. ▪The Bank will not discontinue hedge accounting during the period of IBOR-related uncertainty solely because the retrospective effectiveness falls outside the required 80% –125% range. ▪The Bank has not recycled the cash flow hedge reserve relating to the period after the reforms are expected to take effect. ▪The Bank has assessed whether the hedged IBOR risk component is a separately identifiable risk only when it first designates a hedged item in a fair value hedge and not on an ongoing basis. The Bank also applies the ‘Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – Phase 2’ issued in August 2020. The Phase 2 amendments provide relief when changes are made to hedge relationships as a result of the interest rate benchmark reform. In summary, the reliefs provided by the Phase 2 amendments are: ▪Under a temporary exception, the Bank has considered that changes to the hedge designation and hedge documentation due to the interest rate benchmark reform would not constitute the discontinuation of the hedge relationship nor the designation of a new hedging relationship. ▪In respect of the retrospective hedge effectiveness assessment, the Bank may elect, on a hedge-by-hedge basis, to reset the cumulative fair value changes to zero when the exception to the retrospective assessment ends (Phase 1 relief). Any hedge ineffectiveness will continue to be measured and recognised in full in profit or loss. ▪The Bank has deemed the amounts accumulated in the cash flow hedge reserve to be based on the alternative benchmark rate (on which the hedge future cash flows are determined) when there is a change in basis for determining the contractual cash flows. ▪For hedges of groups of items (such as those forming part of a macro cash flow hedging strategy), the amendments provide relief for items within a designated group of items that are amended for changes directly required by the reform. ▪In respect of whether a risk component of a hedged item is separately identifiable, the amendments provide temporary relief to entities to meet this requirement when an alternative risk free rate (RFR) financial instrument is designated as a risk component. These amendments allow the Bank upon designation of the hedge to assume that the separately identifiable requirement is met if the Bank reasonably expects the RFR risk will become separately identifiable within the next 24 months. The Bank applies this relief to each RFR on a rate-by-rate basis and starts when the Bank first designates the RFR as a non-contractually specified risk component. |
Fair value hedge accounting Changes in fair value of derivatives that qualify and are designated as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk. The fair value changes adjust the carrying value of the hedged asset or liability held at amortised cost. If hedge relationships no longer meet the criteria for hedge accounting, hedge accounting is discontinued. For fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the fair value adjustment to the hedged item is amortised to the income statement over the period to maturity of the previously designated hedge relationship using the effective interest method. If the hedged item is sold or repaid, the unamortised fair value adjustment is recognised immediately in the income statement. For items classified as fair value through other comprehensive income, the hedge accounting adjustment is included in other comprehensive income. Cash flow hedge accounting For qualifying cash flow hedges, the fair value gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognised initially in other comprehensive income, and then recycled to the income statement in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in the income statement immediately. When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognised when the hedged item is ultimately recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement. |
Total derivatives | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
Notional contract amount | Fair value | Notional contract amount | Fair value | |||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Total derivative assets/(liabilities) held for trading | 6,821,204 | 40,435 | (32,493) | 3,756,183 | 33,875 | (33,515) |
Total derivative assets/(liabilities) held for risk management | 5,469 | 4 | (1) | 2,514 | — | (2) |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) | 6,826,673 | 40,439 | (32,494) | 3,758,697 | 33,875 | (33,517) |
Derivatives held for trading | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
Notional contract amount | Fair value | Notional contract amount | Fair value | |||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Foreign exchange derivatives | ||||||
OTC derivatives | 806,891 | 6,833 | (6,067) | 785,832 | 4,857 | (4,536) |
Exchange traded futures and options – bought and sold | 4,108 | — | — | 1,469 | — | — |
Foreign exchange derivatives | 810,999 | 6,833 | (6,067) | 787,301 | 4,857 | (4,536) |
Interest rate derivatives | ||||||
OTC derivatives | 4,267,780 | 31,725 | (24,483) | 2,360,375 | 27,167 | (26,613) |
Interest rate derivatives cleared by central counterparty | 1,556,677 | 344 | (202) | 445,293 | 201 | (45) |
Exchange traded futures and options – bought and sold | 17,562 | 1 | (1) | 29,556 | 4 | (4) |
Interest rate derivatives | 5,842,019 | 32,070 | (24,686) | 2,835,224 | 27,372 | (26,662) |
Credit derivatives | ||||||
OTC swaps | 71,858 | 230 | (346) | 59,798 | 277 | (607) |
Credit derivatives cleared by central counterparty | 3,604 | 16 | (23) | 2,313 | 34 | (53) |
Credit derivatives | 75,462 | 246 | (369) | 62,111 | 311 | (660) |
Equity and stock index derivatives | ||||||
OTC derivatives | 64,911 | 953 | (1,039) | 52,694 | 1,069 | (1,391) |
Exchange traded futures and options – bought and sold | 26,253 | 332 | (332) | 17,290 | 261 | (261) |
Equity and stock index derivatives | 91,164 | 1,285 | (1,371) | 69,984 | 1,330 | (1,652) |
Commodity derivatives | ||||||
OTC derivatives | 823 | 1 | — | 1,148 | 5 | (5) |
Exchange traded futures and options – bought and sold | 737 | — | — | 415 | — | — |
Commodity derivatives | 1,560 | 1 | — | 1,563 | 5 | (5) |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for trading | 6,821,204 | 40,435 | (32,493) | 3,756,183 | 33,875 | (33,515) |
Total OTC derivatives held for trading | 5,212,263 | 39,742 | (31,935) | 3,259,847 | 33,375 | (33,152) |
Total derivatives cleared by central counterparty held for trading | 1,560,281 | 360 | (225) | 447,606 | 235 | (98) |
Total exchange traded derivatives held for trading | 48,660 | 333 | (333) | 48,730 | 265 | (265) |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for trading | 6,821,204 | 40,435 | (32,493) | 3,756,183 | 33,875 | (33,515) |
Derivatives held for risk management | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
Notional contract amount | Fair value | Notional contract amount | Fair value | |||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | 531 | 4 | (1) | 578 | — | (2) |
Interest rate derivatives cleared by central counterparty | 4,295 | — | — | 1,231 | — | — |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | 4,826 | 4 | (1) | 1,809 | — | (2) |
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | 631 | — | — | 705 | — | — |
Interest rate derivatives cleared by central counterparty | 12 | — | — | — | — | — |
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges | 643 | — | — | 705 | — | — |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for risk management | 5,469 | 4 | (1) | 2,514 | — | (2) |
Total OTC derivatives held for risk management | 1,162 | 4 | (1) | 1,283 | — | (2) |
Total derivatives cleared by central counterparty held for risk management | 4,307 | — | — | 1,231 | — | — |
Derivative assets/(liabilities) held for risk management | 5,469 | 4 | (1) | 2,514 | — | (2) |
Hedged items in fair value hedge accounting relationships | |||||
Accumulated fair value adjustment included in carrying amount | |||||
Carrying amount | Total | Of which: Accumulated fair value adjustment on items no longer in a hedge relationship | Change in fair value used as a basis to determine ineffectiveness | Hedge ineffectiveness recognised in the income statement | |
Hedged item statement of financial position classification and risk category | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
2022 | |||||
Asset | |||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | |||||
- Interest rate risk | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — |
Liabilities | |||||
Debt securities in issue | |||||
- Interest rate risk | (639) | 6 | — | 134 | (3) |
Total | (635) | 10 | 4 | 134 | (3) |
2021 | |||||
Asset | |||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | |||||
- Interest rate risk | 6 | 6 | 6 | — | — |
Liabilities | |||||
Debt securities in issue | |||||
- Interest rate risk | (799) | (129) | (3) | 47 | 2 |
Total | (793) | (123) | 3 | 47 | 2 |
Carrying value | Change in fair value used as a basis to determine ineffectiveness | ||||
Derivative assets | Derivative liabilities | Notional amount | |||
Hedge Type | Risk Category | €m | €m | €m | €m |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||
Fair Value | Interest rate risk | — | — | 643 | (137) |
Total | — | — | 643 | (137) | |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Fair Value | Interest rate risk | — | — | 705 | (45) |
Total | — | — | 705 | (45) |
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 and later | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
2022 | |||||||
Fair value hedges of interest rate risk | |||||||
interest rate risk (outstanding notional amount) | 643 | 638 | 633 | 480 | 410 | 405 | 405 |
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 and later | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
2021 | |||||||
Fair value hedges of interest rate risk | |||||||
interest rate risk (outstanding notional amount) | 705 | 704 | 699 | 694 | 541 | 471 | 471 |
Change in value of hedged item used as the basis for recognising ineffectiveness | Balance in cash flow hedging reserve for continuing hedges | Balances remaining in cash flow hedging reserve for which hedge accounting is no longer applied | Hedging gains or losses recognised in other comprehensive income | Hedge ineffectiveness recognised in the income statementa | |
Description of hedge relationship and hedged risk | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
2022 | |||||
Cash flow hedge of interest rate risk | |||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 234 | 111 | 130 | 234 | (5) |
2021 | |||||
Cash flow hedge of interest rate risk | |||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 16 | 7 | 8 | 16 | (1) |
Carrying value | Change in fair value used as a basis to determine ineffectiveness | ||||
Derivative assets | Derivative liabilities | Notional amount | |||
Hedge Type | Risk Category | €m | €m | €m | €m |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||
Cash Flow | Interest rate risk | 4 | (1) | 4,826 | (239) |
Total | 4 | (1) | 4,826 | (239) | |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Cash Flow | Interest rate risk | — | (2) | 1,809 | (17) |
Total | — | (2) | 1,809 | (17) |
2022 | 2021 | |||
Amount recycled from other comprehensive income due to hedged item affecting income statement | Amount recycled from other comprehensive income due to sale of investment, or cash flows no longer expected to occur | Amount recycled from other comprehensive income due to hedged item affecting income statement | Amount recycled from other comprehensive income due to sale of investment, or cash flows no longer expected to occur | |
Description of hedge relationship and hedged risk | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Cash flow hedge of interest rate risk | ||||
Recycled to net interest income | (9) | — | (1) | 1 |
2022 | 2021 | |
Cash flow hedging reserve | Cash flow hedging reserve | |
Description of hedge relationship and hedged risk | €m | €m |
Balance on 1 January | (14) | — |
Hedging losses for the year | (234) | (16) |
Amounts reclassified in relation to cash flows affecting profit or loss | 9 | — |
Tax | 28 | 2 |
Balance on 31 December | (211) | (14) |
Accounting for liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss In accordance with IFRS 9, financial liabilities may be designated at fair value, with gains and losses taken to the income statement within net trading income (Note 5) and net investment expense (Note 6). Movements in own credit are reported through other comprehensive income, unless the effects of changes in the liability's credit risk would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss. In these scenarios, all gains and losses on that liability (including the effects of changes in the credit risk of the liability) are presented in profit or loss. On derecognition of the financial liability no amount relating to own credit risk are recycled to the income statement. The Bank has the ability to make the fair value designation when holding the instruments at fair value reduces an accounting mismatch (caused by an offsetting liability or asset being held at fair value), or is managed by the Bank on the basis of its fair value, or includes terms that have substantive derivative characteristics (Note 13). The details on how the fair value amounts are arrived for financial liabilities designated at fair value are described in Note 15. |
2022 | 2021 | ||||
Fair value | Contractual amount due on maturity | Fair value | Contractual amount due on maturity | ||
€m | €m | €m | €m | ||
Debt securities | 2,469 | 2,724 | 900 | 934 | |
Deposits | 3,251 | 4,426 | 3,295 | 3,755 | |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 9,138 | 9,171 | 9,648 | 9,638 | |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 14,858 | 16,321 | 13,843 | 14,327 |
Accounting for financial assets and liabilities – fair values Financial instruments that are held for trading are recognised at fair value through profit or loss. In addition, financial assets are held at fair value through profit or loss if they do not contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are SPPI, or if the financial asset is not held in a business model that is either (i) a business model to collect the contractual cash flows or (ii) a business model that is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling. Subsequent changes in fair value for these instruments are recognised in the income statement in net investment expense, except if reporting it in trading income reduces an accounting mismatch. All financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date of initial recognition (including transaction costs, other than financial instruments held at fair value through profit or loss) and, depending on the classification of the asset or liability, may continue to be held at fair value either through profit or loss or other comprehensive income. The fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Wherever possible, fair value is determined by reference to a quoted market price for that instrument. For many of the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities, especially derivatives, quoted prices are not available and valuation models are used to estimate fair value. The models calculate the expected cash flows under the terms of each specific contract and then discount these values back to a present value. These models use as their basis independently sourced market inputs where applicable including where available, for example, interest rate yield curves, equities and commodities prices, option volatilities and currency rates. For financial liabilities measured at fair value, the carrying amount reflects the effect on fair value of changes in own credit spreads derived from observable market data such as in primary issuance and redemption activity for structured notes. On initial recognition, it is presumed that the transaction price is the fair value unless there is observable information available in an active market to the contrary. The best evidence of an instrument’s fair value on initial recognition is typically the transaction price. However, if fair value can be evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument, or is based on a valuation technique whose inputs include only data from observable markets, then the instrument should be recognised at the fair value derived from such observable market data. For valuations that have made use of unobservable inputs, the difference between the model valuation and the initial transaction price (Day One profit) is recognised in profit or loss either: on a straight-line basis over the term of the transaction; or over the period until all model inputs will become observable where appropriate; or released in full when previously unobservable inputs become observable. Various factors influence the availability of observable inputs and these may vary from product to product and change over time. Factors include the depth of activity in the relevant market, the type of product, whether the product is new and not widely traded in the marketplace, the maturity of market modelling and the nature of the transaction (bespoke or generic). To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are not observable in the market, the determination of fair value can be more subjective, dependent on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation. Unobservable inputs are determined based on the best information available, for example by reference to similar assets, similar maturities or other analytical techniques. The sensitivity of valuations used in the financial statements to possible changes in significant unobservable inputs is shown on page 165. |
Critical accounting estimates and judgements The valuation of financial instruments often involves a significant degree of judgement and complexity, in particular where valuation models make use of unobservable inputs (‘Level 3’ assets and liabilities). This note provides information on these instruments, including the related unrealised gains and losses recognised in the period, a description of significant valuation techniques and unobservable inputs, and a sensitivity analysis. Climate related risks are assumed to be included in the fair values of assets and liabilities traded in active markets. |
Assets and liabilities held at fair value | ||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Trading portfolio assets | 521 | 7,085 | 94 | 7,700 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | — | 16,806 | 410 | 17,216 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 40,050 | 389 | 40,439 |
Total assets | 521 | 63,941 | 893 | 65,355 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | (1,411) | (11,452) | (9) | (12,872) |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | — | (14,766) | (92) | (14,858) |
Derivative financial instruments | — | (32,117) | (377) | (32,494) |
Total liabilities | (1,411) | (58,335) | (478) | (60,224) |
Assets and liabilities held at fair value | ||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
As at 31 December 2021 | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Trading portfolio assets | 620 | 7,534 | 50 | 8,204 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | — | 15,002 | 350 | 15,352 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 33,740 | 135 | 33,875 |
Total assets | 620 | 56,276 | 535 | 57,431 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | (773) | (9,509) | (4) | (10,286) |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | — | (13,843) | — | (13,843) |
Derivative financial instruments | — | (33,463) | (54) | (33,517) |
Total liabilities | (773) | (56,815) | (58) | (57,646) |
Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value by product type | ||||
2022 | 2021 | |||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Interest rate derivatives | 99 | (44) | 97 | (9) |
Foreign exchange derivatives | 101 | (124) | 34 | (41) |
Credit derivatives | 1 | (13) | 4 | (4) |
Equity derivatives | 188 | (196) | — | — |
Certificates of Deposit, Commercial Paper and other money market instruments | — | (92) | — | — |
Asset backed loans | 318 | — | 326 | — |
Non asset backed loans | 135 | — | 50 | — |
Other | 51 | (9) | 24 | (4) |
Total | 893 | (478) | 535 | (58) |
Analysis of movements in Level 3 assets and liabilities | |||||||||||
As at 1 January 2022 | Total gains and (losses) in the period recognised in the income statement | Total gains or (losses) recognis ed in OCI | Transfers | As at 31 December 2022 | |||||||
Purchases | Sales | Issues | Settlements | Trading income/ (losses) | Investment income | In | Out | ||||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Non asset backed loans | 50 | 121 | (104) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67 |
Other | — | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 27 |
Trading portfolio assets | 50 | 147 | (104) | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 94 |
Asset backed loans | 326 | 4 | — | — | (27) | — | 15 | — | — | — | 318 |
Non asset backed loans | — | 72 | — | — | — | (4) | — | — | — | — | 68 |
Other | 24 | 1 | — | — | — | (1) | — | — | — | — | 24 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 350 | 77 | — | — | (27) | (5) | 15 | — | — | — | 410 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | (4) | (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (5) | 4 | (9) |
Financial liabilities designated at Fair value | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (92) | — | (92) |
Interest rate derivatives | 88 | — | — | — | (3) | 3 | — | — | (15) | (18) | 55 |
Foreign exchange derivatives | (7) | — | — | — | (9) | (12) | — | — | 1 | 4 | (23) |
Credit derivatives | — | (1) | 1 | — | — | (5) | — | — | (7) | — | (12) |
Equity derivatives | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (8) | — | (8) |
Net derivative financial instrumentsa | 81 | (1) | 1 | — | (12) | (14) | — | — | (29) | (14) | 12 |
Total | 477 | 219 | (103) | — | (39) | (19) | 15 | — | (125) | (10) | 415 |
Analysis of movements in Level 3 assets and liabilities | |||||||||||
As at 1 January 2021 | Purchases | Sales | Issues | Settlements | Total gains and (losses) in the period recognised in the income statement | Total gains or (losses) recognis ed in OCI | Transfers | As at 31 December 2021 | |||
Trading income | Investment income | In | Out | ||||||||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Non asset backed loans | 76 | 50 | (76) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50 |
Trading portfolio assets | 76 | 50 | (76) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50 |
Asset backed loans | 357 | — | — | — | (35) | — | 4 | — | — | — | 326 |
Other | — | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 357 | 24 | — | — | (35) | — | 4 | — | — | — | 350 |
Trading portfolio liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (4) | — | (4) |
Interest rate derivatives | — | — | — | — | (25) | 96 | — | — | (6) | 23 | 88 |
Foreign exchange derivatives | — | — | — | — | (11) | (5) | — | — | 9 | — | (7) |
Credit derivatives | — | (1) | 3 | — | (6) | 4 | — | — | — | — | — |
Net derivative financial instrumentsa | — | (1) | 3 | — | (42) | 95 | — | — | 3 | 23 | 81 |
Total | 433 | 73 | (73) | — | (77) | 95 | 4 | — | (1) | 23 | 477 |
Unrealised gains and (losses) recognised during the period on Level 3 assets and liabilities held at year end | ||||||
2022 | 2021 | |||||
Income statement | Income statement | |||||
Trading income | Investment income | Total | Trading income | Investment losses | Total | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | (5) | 15 | 10 | — | 4 | 4 |
Net derivative financial instruments | (16) | — | (16) | 95 | — | 95 |
Total | (21) | 15 | (6) | 95 | 4 | 99 |
Valuation technique(s) | Significant unobservable inputs | 2022 Range | 2021 Range | ||||
Min | Max | Min | Max | Unitsa | |||
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||
Interest rate derivatives | Discounted cash flows | Inflation forwards | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | % |
Option Model | Interest rate volatility | 42 | 261 | 19 | 465 | bps vol | |
Equity derivatives | Discounted cash flows | Discount margin | (205) | 26 | — | — | bps |
Foreign exchange derivatives | Option Model | Option Volatility | 4 | 13 | 5 | 14 | points |
Discounted cash flows | Yield | (3) | 2 | — | — | % | |
Non-derivative financial instruments | |||||||
Asset backed loans | Discounted cash flows | Credit spread | 200 | 300 | 200 | 300 | bps |
Non asset backed loans | Comparable Pricing | Yield | — | — | 5 | 6 | % |
Comparable Pricing | Price | 96 | 100 | — | — | points | |
Certificates of Deposit, Commercial paper and other money market instruments | Discounted cash flows | Credit spread | 128 | 128 | — | — | bps |
Sensitivity analysis of valuations using unobservable inputs | ||||
2022 | 2021 | |||
Favourable changes | Unfavourable changes | Favourable changes | Unfavourable changes | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Interest rate derivatives | 2 | (3) | 1 | (1) |
Credit derivatives | 1 | (1) | 1 | — |
Asset backed loans | 24 | (33) | 18 | (18) |
Non asset backed loans | 3 | (3) | 1 | (1) |
Total | 30 | (40) | 21 | (20) |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Exit price adjustments derived from market bid-offer spreads | (29) | (11) |
Uncollateralised derivative funding | 11 | (5) |
Derivative credit valuation adjustments | (28) | (21) |
Derivative debit valuation adjustments | 23 | 6 |
2022 | |||||
Carrying amount | Fair value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Financial assets | |||||
Loans and advances to banks | 1,412 | 1,412 | 278 | 1,134 | — |
Loans and advances to customers | 13,948 | 13,579 | — | 2,071 | 11,508 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 1,764 | 1,611 | — | 1,611 | — |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Deposits from banks | (3,628) | (3,628) | (940) | (2,687) | — |
Deposits from customers | (25,793) | (25,793) | (13,068) | (12,726) | — |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | (2,964) | (2,964) | — | (2,964) | — |
Debt securities in issue | (3,139) | (3,139) | — | (3,139) | — |
Subordinated liabilities | (4,679) | (4,313) | — | (4,313) | — |
2021 | |||||
Carrying amount | Fair value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Financial assets | |||||
Loans and advances to banks | 903 | 903 | 75 | 828 | — |
Loans and advances to customers | 13,083 | 12,467 | — | 2,057 | 10,410 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 3,228 | 3,228 | — | 3,228 | — |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Deposits from banks | (4,252) | (4,252) | (803) | (3,449) | — |
Deposits from customers | (21,382) | (21,382) | (13,841) | (7,541) | — |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | (3,596) | (3,596) | — | (3,596) | — |
Debt securities in issue | (3,397) | (3,397) | — | (3,397) | — |
Subordinated liabilities | (3,171) | (3,278) | — | (3,278) | — |
Amounts subject to enforceable netting arrangements | Amounts not subject to enforceable netting arrangementsc | Balance sheet totald | ||||||
Effects of offsetting on-balance sheet | Related amounts not offset | |||||||
Gross amounts | Amounts offseta | Net amounts reported on the balance sheet | Financial instruments | Financial collateralb | Net amount | |||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Derivative financial assets | 72,964 | (32,666) | 40,298 | (23,787) | (14,448) | 2,063 | 141 | 40,439 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lendinge | 44,156 | (26,996) | 17,160 | — | (17,160) | — | 27 | 17,187 |
Total assets | 117,120 | (59,662) | 57,458 | (23,787) | (31,608) | 2,063 | 168 | 57,626 |
Derivative financial liabilities | (65,862) | 33,712 | (32,150) | 23,787 | 6,363 | (2,000) | (344) | (32,494) |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowinge | (37,565) | 26,996 | (10,569) | — | 10,569 | — | (1,533) | (12,102) |
Total liabilities | (103,427) | 60,708 | (42,719) | 23,787 | 16,932 | (2,000) | (1,877) | (44,596) |
As at 31 December 2021 | ||||||||
Derivative financial assets | 41,756 | (8,003) | 33,753 | (21,928) | (10,365) | 1,460 | 122 | 33,875 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lendinge | 46,444 | (28,619) | 17,825 | — | (17,825) | — | 4 | 17,829 |
Total assets | 88,200 | (36,622) | 51,578 | (21,928) | (28,190) | 1,460 | 126 | 51,704 |
Derivative financial liabilities | (40,944) | 7,617 | (33,327) | 21,928 | 10,273 | (1,126) | (190) | (33,517) |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowinge | (38,946) | 28,619 | (10,327) | — | 10,327 | — | (2,917) | (13,244) |
Total liabilities | (79,890) | 36,236 | (43,654) | 21,928 | 20,600 | (1,126) | (3,107) | (46,761) |
The notes included in this section focus on the Bank’s loans and advances and deposits at amortised cost, property, plant and equipment, leases, intangible assets, cash collateral and settlement balances and Other assets. Details regarding the Bank’s assets and liabilities at amortised cost can be found on pages 169 to 173. |
Accounting for financial instruments held at amortised cost Loans and advances to customers and banks, customer accounts, debt securities and most financial liabilities are held at amortised cost. That is, the initial fair value (which is normally the amount advanced or borrowed) is adjusted for repayments and the amortisation of coupon, fees and expenses to represent the effective interest rate of the asset or liability. Balances deferred on-balance sheet as effective interest rate adjustments are amortised to interest income over the life of the financial instrument to which they relate. Financial assets that are held in a business model to collect the contractual cash flows and that contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are SPPI, are measured at amortised cost. The carrying value of these financial assets at initial recognition includes any directly attributable transaction costs. In determining whether the business model is a ‘hold to collect’ model, the objective of the business model must be to hold the financial asset to collect contractual cash flows rather than holding the financial asset for trading or short-term profit taking purposes. While the objective of the business model must be to hold the financial asset to collect contractual cash flows this does not mean the Bank is required to hold the financial assets until maturity. When determining if the business model objective is to collect contractual cash flows the Bank will consider past sales and expectations about future sales. |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | |||
2022 | 2021 | ||
As at 31 December | €m | €m | |
Loans and advances at amortised cost to banks | 1,412 | 903 | |
Loans and advances at amortised cost to customers | 13,861 | 13,004 | |
Debt securities at amortised cost | 87 | 79 | |
Total loans and advances at amortised cost | 15,360 | 13,986 |
Deposits at amortised cost | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m |
Deposits at amortised cost from banks | 3,628 | 4,252 |
Deposits at amortised cost from customers | 25,793 | 21,382 |
Total deposits at amortised cost | 29,421 | 25,634 |
Accounting for property, plant and equipment The Bank applies IAS 16 Property Plant and Equipment. | |
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, which includes direct and incremental acquisition costs less accumulated depreciation and provisions for impairment, if required. Subsequent costs are capitalised if these result in enhancement of the asset. | |
Depreciation is provided on the depreciable amount of items of property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful economic lives. Depreciation rates, methods and the residual values underlying the calculation of depreciation of items of property, plant and equipment are kept under review to take account of any change in circumstances. The Bank uses the following annual rates in calculating depreciation: | |
Annual rates in calculating depreciation | Depreciation rate |
Freehold buildings and long-leasehold property (more than 50 years to run) Leasehold property over the remaining life of the lease (less than 50 years to run) Costs of adaptation of leasehold property Equipment installed in leasehold property Computers and similar equipment Fixtures and fittings and other equipment | 2-3.3% Over the remaining life of the lease 6-10% 6-10% 17-33% 9-20% |
Costs of adaptation and installed equipment are depreciated over the shorter of the life of the lease or the depreciation rates noted in the table above |
Property | Equipment | Right of use assetsa | Total | ||
€m | €m | €m | €m | ||
Cost | |||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 50 | 51 | 97 | 198 | |
Additions | 6 | 8 | 10 | 24 | |
Disposals | — | (2) | — | (2) | |
Other movements | — | — | 24 | 24 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | 56 | 57 | 131 | 244 | |
Accumulated depreciation and impairment | |||||
As at 1 January 2022 | (32) | (35) | (41) | (108) | |
Disposals | — | 2 | — | 2 | |
Depreciation charge | (3) | (8) | (15) | (26) | |
Other movements | — | — | 2 | 2 | |
As at 31 December 2022 | (35) | (41) | (54) | (130) | |
Net book value | 21 | 16 | 77 | 114 | |
Cost | |||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 49 | 43 | 99 | 191 | |
Additions | 1 | 8 | — | 9 | |
Disposals | — | — | — | — | |
Other movements | — | — | (2) | (2) | |
As at 31 December 2021 | 50 | 51 | 97 | 198 | |
Accumulated depreciation and impairment | |||||
As at 1 January 2021 | (28) | (29) | (28) | (85) | |
Disposals | — | — | — | — | |
Depreciation charge | (4) | (6) | (13) | (23) | |
As at 31 December 2021 | (32) | (35) | (41) | (108) | |
Net book value | 18 | 16 | 56 | 90 |
Accounting for leases IFRS 16 applies to all leases with the exception of licenses of intellectual property, rights held by licensing agreement within the scope of IAS 38 Intangible Assets, service concession arrangements, leases of biological assets within the scope of IAS 41 Agriculture and leases of minerals, oil, natural gas and similar non-regenerative resources. IFRS 16 includes an accounting policy choice for a lessee to elect not to apply IFRS 16 to remaining assets within the scope of IAS 38 Intangible Assets which the Bank has decided to apply. When the Bank is the lessee, it is required to recognise both: ▪A lease liability, measured at the present value of remaining cash flows on the lease; and ▪A right of use (‘ROU’) asset, measured at the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability, plus any lease payments made prior to commencement date, initial direct costs, and estimated costs of restoring the underlying asset to the condition required by the lease, less any lease incentives received. Subsequently the lease liability will increase for the accrual of interest, resulting in a constant rate of return throughout the life of the lease, and reduce when payments are made. The right of use asset will amortise to the income statement over the life of the lease. The lease liability is remeasured when there is a change in one of the following: ▪Future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate; ▪The Bank’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee; or ▪The Bank’s assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option. When the lease liability is remeasured, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the ROU asset, or is recorded in the income statement if the carrying amount of the ROU asset has been reduced to nil. On the balance sheet, the ROU assets are included within property, plant and equipment and the lease liabilities are included within other liabilities. The Bank applies the recognition exemption in IFRS 16 for leases with a term not exceeding 12 months. For these leases the lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term unless another systematic basis is more appropriate. |
Lease liabilities | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
As at 1 January | 58 | 75 |
Interest | 2 | 2 |
New leases | 10 | — |
Disposal | — | — |
Cash payments | (16) | (16) |
Exchange and other movementsa | 27 | (3) |
As at 31 December (see Note 23) | 81 | 58 |
Undiscounted lease liabilities maturity analysis | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Not more than one year | 15 | 12 |
One to two years | 16 | 8 |
Two to three years | 16 | 7 |
Three to four years | 10 | 6 |
Four to five years | 8 | 6 |
Five to ten years | 19 | 16 |
Greater than ten years | 12 | 14 |
Total undiscounted lease liabilities as at 31 December | 96 | 69 |
Accounting for intangible assets Intangible assets Intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets. Intangible assets are initially recognised when they are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights, the cost can be measured reliably and, in the case of intangible assets not acquired in a business combination, where it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the assets will flow from their use. | |
For internally generated intangible assets, only costs incurred during the development phase are capitalised. Expenditures in the research phase are expensed when it is incurred. | |
Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and provisions for impairment, if any, and are amortised over their useful lives in a manner that reflects the pattern to which they contribute to future cash flows, generally using the amortisation periods set out below: | |
Annual rates in calculating amortisation | Amortisation period |
Other software | 12 months to 6 years |
Internally generated softwarea | 12 months to 6 years |
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when there are indications that impairment may have occurred. Intangible assets not yet available for use are reviewed annually for impairment. |
Internally generated software | Other software | Licenses and Other contracts | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Cost | ||||
As at 1 January 2022 | 141 | 8 | 3 | 152 |
Additions | 15 | — | 1 | 16 |
Disposals | — | — | — | — |
As at 31 December 2022 | 156 | 8 | 4 | 168 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment | ||||
As at 1 January 2022 | (85) | (7) | (1) | (93) |
Disposals | — | — | — | — |
Impairment Charge | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation charge | (15) | — | (1) | (16) |
As at 31 December 2022 | (100) | (7) | (2) | (109) |
Net book value | 56 | 1 | 2 | 59 |
Cost | ||||
As at 1 January 2021 | 120 | 8 | 3 | 131 |
Additions | 21 | — | — | 21 |
As at 31 December 2021 | 141 | 8 | 3 | 152 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment | ||||
As at 1 January 2021 | (73) | (7) | (1) | (81) |
Disposals | — | — | — | — |
Impairment Charge | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation Charge | (12) | — | — | (12) |
As at 31 December 2021 | (85) | (7) | (1) | (93) |
Net book value | 56 | 1 | 2 | 59 |
2022 | 2021 | |
Assets | €m | €m |
Cash collateral | 10,303 | 13,416 |
Settlement balances | 8,237 | 4,235 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 18,540 | 17,651 |
Liabilities | ||
Cash collateral | 17,052 | 13,293 |
Settlement balances | 7,632 | 3,832 |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 24,684 | 17,125 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Credit related fees receivable | 51 | 53 |
Amounts receivable from Barclays Group companies | 362 | 159 |
Other debtors and prepaid expenses | 178 | 125 |
Other assets | 591 | 337 |
The notes included in this section focus on the Bank’s other liabilities, provisions, contingent liabilities and commitments and legal competition and regulatory matters can be found on pages 174 to 175. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€'m | €'m | |
Accruals and deferred income | 241 | 194 |
Payable to Barclays Group companies | 182 | 71 |
Other creditors | 210 | 140 |
Items in the course of collection due to banks | 29 | 49 |
Lease liabilities (See Note 19) | 81 | 58 |
Other liabilities | 743 | 512 |
Accounting for provisions The Bank applies IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets in accounting for non-financial liabilities. Provisions are recognised for present obligations arising as consequences of past events where it is more likely than not that a transfer of economic benefit will be necessary to settle the obligation, which can be reliably estimated. Provision is made for the anticipated cost of restructuring, including redundancy costs when an obligation exists; for example, when the Bank has a detailed formal plan for restructuring a business and has raised valid expectations in those affected by the restructuring by announcing its main features or starting to implement the plan. |
Critical accounting estimates and judgements The financial reporting of provisions involves a significant degree of judgement and is complex. Identifying whether a present obligation exists and estimating the probability, timing, nature and quantum of the outflows that may arise from past events requires judgements to be made based on the specific facts and circumstances relating to individual events and often requires specialist professional advice. When matters are at an early stage, accounting judgements and estimates can be difficult because of the high degree of uncertainty involved. Management continues to monitor matters as they develop to re-evaluate on an ongoing basis whether provisions should be recognised, however there can remain a wide range of possible outcomes and uncertainties, particularly in relation to legal, competition and regulatory matters, and as a result it is often not practicable to make meaningful estimates even when matters are at a more advanced stage. The complexity of such matters often requires the input of specialist professional advice in making assessments to produce estimates. Customer redress and legal, competition and regulatory matters are areas where a higher degree of professional judgement is required. The amount that is recognised as a provision can also be very sensitive to the assumptions made in calculating it. This gives rise to a large range of potential outcomes which require judgement in determining an appropriate provision level. |
Redundancy and restructuring | Undrawn contractually committed facilities and guarantees provideda | Customer redress | Legal, competition and regulatory matters | Sundry provisions | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 1 January 2022 | 10 | 27 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 79 |
Additions | 12 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 57 |
Amounts utilised | (7) | — | (8) | — | (4) | (19) |
Unused amounts reversed | (6) | (2) | (3) | — | (7) | (18) |
Exchange and other movements | — | (2) | — | — | 2 | — |
As at 31 December 2022 | 9 | 46 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 99 |
As at 1 January 2021 | 9 | 52 | — | — | 11 | 72 |
Additions | 12 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 22 | 52 |
Amounts utilised | (9) | — | — | (1) | (2) | (12) |
Unused amounts reversed | (2) | (31) | (3) | — | (1) | (37) |
Exchange and other movements | — | 2 | — | 2 | — | 4 |
As at 31 December 2021 | 10 | 27 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 79 |
Accounting for contingent liabilities Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events and present obligations where the transfer of economic resources is uncertain or cannot be reliably measured. Contingent liabilities are not recognised on the balance sheet but are disclosed unless the likelihood of an outflow of economic resources is remote. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security | 2,815 | 2,519 |
Performance guarantees, acceptances and endorsements | 1,956 | 1,540 |
Total contingent liabilities and financial guarantees | 4,771 | 4,059 |
Of which: Financial guarantees carried at fair value | — | — |
Documentary credits and other short-term trade related transactions | 69 | 145 |
Standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments | 32,391 | 27,280 |
Total commitments | 32,460 | 27,425 |
Of which: Loan commitments carried at fair value | 1,729 | 1,523 |
The notes included in this section focus on the Bank’s loan capital and shareholders’ equity including issued share capital, retained earnings and other equity balances. For more information on capital management and how the Bank maintains sufficient capital to meet the Bank’s regulatory requirements refer to page 53. |
Accounting for subordinated liabilities Subordinated debt is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method under IFRS 9. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
As at 1 January | 3,171 | 1,061 |
Issuances | 1,500 | 2,310 |
Redemptions | — | (200) |
Other | 8 | — |
As at 31 December | 4,679 | 3,171 |
2022 | 2021 | |||
Rate | Maturity date | €m | €m | |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€125m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.79% | 2024 | 125 | 125 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €600m) | 1m ESTR plus 2.27% | 2026 | 602 | — |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €350m) | 1m Euribor plus 0.84% | 2027 | 350 | 350 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €200m) | 1m Euribor plus 0.86% | 2027 | 200 | 200 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €100m) | 1m Euribor plus 0.77% | 2027 | 100 | 100 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €300m) | 1m Euribor plus 2.40% | 2028 | 301 | — |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €300m) | 1m Euribor plus 2.24% | 2028 | 301 | — |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €800m) | 1m Euribor plus 0.94% | 2029 | 802 | 800 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€375m) | 1m Euribor plus 4.04% | 2029 | 377 | 376 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€56m) | 1m Euribor plus 3.851% | 2029 | 56 | 56 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€95m) | 1m Euribor plus 3.855% | 2029 | 95 | 95 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€170m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.81% | 2030 | 170 | 170 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€160m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.625% | 2031 | 160 | 160 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan (€39m) | 1m Euribor plus 3.32% | 2031 | 39 | 39 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €370m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.07% | 2032 | 370 | 370 |
Tier 2 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €300m) | 1m Euribor plus 4.35% | 2032 | 301 | — |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €200m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.01% | 2032 | 200 | 200 |
Tier 3 Floating Rate Subordinated Loan ( €130m) | 1m Euribor plus 1.10% | 2032 | 130 | 130 |
Total subordinated liabilitiesa | 4,679 | 3,171 |
Authorised ordinary share capital | ||||
2022 | 2021 | |||
Number of shares | Ordinary share capital | Number of shares | Ordinary share capital | |
m | €m | m | €m | |
At 31 December | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
Called up share capital, allotted and fully paid and other equity instruments | |||||
Number of shares | Ordinary share capital | Ordinary share premium | Total share capital and share premium | Other equity instruments | |
m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 1 January 2022 | 899 | 899 | 2,348 | 3,247 | 805 |
Issue of ordinary shares | — | — | 625 | 625 | — |
As at 31 December 2022 | 899 | 899 | 2,973 | 3,872 | 805 |
As at 1 January 2021 | 899 | 899 | 1,383 | 2,282 | 565 |
Issue of ordinary shares | — | — | 965 | 965 | — |
AT1 securities issuance | — | — | — | — | 240 |
As at 31 December 2021 | 899 | 899 | 2,348 | 3,247 | 805 |
2022 | 2021 | ||
Rate | €m | €m | |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€300m) | 1m Euribor plus 7.356% | 300 | 300 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€69m) | 1m Euribor plus 6.682% | 69 | 69 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€36m) | 1m Euribor plus 5.950% | 36 | 36 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€85m) | 1m Euribor plus 6.240% | 85 | 85 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€75m) | 1m Euribor plus 6.240% | 75 | 75 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€100m) | 1m Euribor plus 4.343% | 100 | 100 |
AT1 Floating Rate Perpetual Contingent Write-down Securities (€140m) | 1m Euribor plus 3.720% | 140 | 140 |
Total AT1 securities | 805 | 805 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Cash flow hedging reserve | (211) | (14) |
Own credit reserve | (15) | (137) |
Other reserves and other shareholders' equity | (45) | (45) |
Total | (271) | (196) |
The notes included in this section focus on the Bank’s staff costs, share-based payments and pensions and post-retirement benefits, structured entities, financing activities, assets pledged, collateral received and assets transferred, repurchase agreements and other similar borrowing, consolidated entities, related party transactions and directors’ remuneration, auditor’s remuneration, post balance sheet events and interest rate benchmark reform can be found on pages 179 to 197. |
Accounting for staff costs The Bank applies IAS 19 Employee benefits in its accounting for most of the components of staff costs. Short-term employee benefits – salaries, accrued performance costs and social security are recognised over the period in which the employees provide the services to which the payments relate. Performance costs – Recognised to the extent that the Bank has a present obligation to its employees that can be measured reliably and are recognised over the period of service that employees are required to work to qualify for the payments. Deferred cash and share awards are made to employees to incentivise performance over the period employees provide services. To receive payment under an award, employees must provide service over the vesting period. The period over which the expense for deferred cash and share awards is recognised is based upon the period employees consider their services contribute to the awards. For past awards, the Bank considers that it is appropriate to recognise the awards over the period from the date of grant to the date that the awards vest. The accounting policies for share-based payments, and pensions and other post-retirement benefits are included in Notes 31 and 32 respectively. |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Salaries | 206 | 186 |
Social security costs | 75 | 64 |
Post-retirement benefitsa | 11 | 11 |
Performance costs | 99 | 87 |
Other compensation costsb | 19 | 18 |
Total compensation costs | 410 | 366 |
Other resourcing costs | ||
Outsourcing | 16 | 11 |
Redundancy and restructuring | 8 | 10 |
Temporary staff costs | 2 | 7 |
Other resourcing costs | 5 | 5 |
Total other resourcing costs | 31 | 33 |
Total staff costs | 441 | 399 |
Accounting for share-based payments The Bank applies IFRS 2 Share-based Payments in accounting for employee remuneration in the form of shares. Employee incentives include awards in the form of shares and share options, as well as offering employees the opportunity to purchase shares on favourable terms. The cost of the employee services received in respect of the shares or share options granted is recognised in the income statement over the period that employees provide services. The overall cost of the award is calculated using the number of shares and options expected to vest and the fair value of the shares or options at the date of grant. The number of shares and options expected to vest takes into account the likelihood that performance and service conditions included in the terms of the awards will be met. Failure to meet the non-vesting condition is treated as a cancellation, resulting in an acceleration of recognition of the cost of the employee services. The fair value of shares is the market price ruling on the grant date, in some cases adjusted to reflect restrictions on transferability. The fair value of options granted is determined using the Black Scholes model to estimate the numbers of shares likely to vest. The model takes into account the exercise price of the option, the current share price, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of the share price over the life of the option and other relevant factors. Market conditions that must be met in order for the award to vest are also reflected in the fair value of the award, as are any other non-vesting conditions – such as continuing to make payments into a share- based savings scheme. |
2022 | 2021 | |||||||
Weighted average fair value per award granted in year | Weighted average share price at exercise/ release during year | Weighted average remaining contractual life in years | Number of options/ awards outstanding | Weighted average fair value per award granted in year | Weighted average share price at exercise/ release during year | Weighted average remaining contractual life in years | Number of options/ awards outstanding | |
€ | € | € | € | |||||
DSVP and SVPa,b | 1.45 | 1.61 | 1 | 19,558,688 | 1.63 | 1.75 | 1 | 15,468,680 |
Sharesavea | — | 1.75 | 2 | 1,404,488 | 0.63 | 1.72 | 3 | 1,615,979 |
Othersa | 1.60-1.63 | 1.57-1.67 | — | 129,457 | 1.75-1.78 | 1.75-1.80 | — | 119,378 |
DSVP and SVPa,b | Sharesavea | Othersa | ||||||||
Number | Number | Weighted average ex. price (€) | Number | |||||||
2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||
Outstanding at beginning of year/acquisition datec | 15,468,680 | 13,227,450 | 1,615,979 | 1,705,327 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 119,378 | 114,245 | ||
Transfers in the yeard | 192,145 | 1,506,170 | 75,886 | 117,600 | 9,384 | 15,834 | ||||
Granted in the year | 12,149,246 | 8,284,419 | — | 6,293 | — | 1.43 | 4,094,680 | 3,812,579 | ||
Exercised/released in the year | (7,296,344) | (5,517,908) | (74,768) | (29,355) | 1.28 | 1.37 | (4,087,129) | (3,818,894) | ||
Less: forfeited in the year | (955,039) | (2,031,451) | (208,039) | (130,905) | 0.88 | 1.03 | (6,856) | (4,386) | ||
Less: expired in the year | — | — | (4,570) | (52,981) | 1.40 | 1.13 | — | — | ||
Outstanding at end of year | 19,558,688 | 15,468,680 | 1,404,488 | 1,615,979 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 129,457 | 119,378 | ||
Of which exercisable: | — | — | 27,539 | 23,906 | 1.17 | 1.43 | 60,400 | 55,016 |
Accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits The Bank operates a number of pension schemes and post-employment benefit schemes. |
Defined contribution schemes – the Bank recognises contributions due in respect of the accounting period in the income statement. Any contributions unpaid at the balance sheet date are included as a liability. |
Defined benefit schemes – the Bank recognises its obligations to members of each scheme at the period end, less the fair value of the scheme assets after applying the asset ceiling test. |
Each scheme’s obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. Scheme assets are stated at fair value as at the period end. Changes in pension scheme liabilities or assets (re-measurements) that do not arise from regular pension cost, net interest on net defined benefit liabilities or assets, past service costs, settlements or contributions to the scheme, are recognised in other comprehensive income. Re-measurements comprise experience adjustments (differences between previous actuarial assumptions and what has actually occurred), the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions, return on scheme assets (excluding amounts included in the interest on the assets) and any changes in the effect of the asset ceiling restriction (excluding amounts included in the interest on the restriction). The risks that Barclays runs in relation to the post retirement schemes are typical of final salary pension schemes, principally that investment returns fall short of expectations, that inflation exceeds expectations, and that retirees live longer than expected. |
Accounting estimates There are four key estimates that impact the net defined benefit liability. These are the discount rate, the inflation rate, the rate of increase for pensions and mortality. These are set out in detail in pages 185 to 186. |
Income statement charge | |||||
2022 | |||||
Irelanda | Germanya | Francea | Portugala | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Interest cost on Defined Benefit Obligation (‘DBO’) | 1 | (2) | — | — | (1) |
Interest income on assets | (1) | — | — | — | (1) |
Net interest cost on net defined benefit liability | — | (2) | — | — | (2) |
Other finance income | |||||
Current service cost | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
Total service cost | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
Curtailment or settlements | — | — | — | — | — |
Pension expense | — | (2) | 1 | — | (1) |
Income statement charge | |||||
2021 | |||||
Irelanda | Germanya | Francea | Portugala | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Interest cost on Defined Benefit Obligation (‘DBO’) | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Interest income on assets | (1) | — | — | — | (1) |
Net interest cost on net defined benefit liability | — | — | — | — | — |
Other finance income | |||||
Current service cost | — | — | — | — | — |
Total service cost | — | — | — | — | — |
Pension expense | — | — | — | — | — |
Statement of other comprehensive income | |||||
2022 | |||||
Ireland | Germanya | Francea | Portugala | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss - experience | 3 | — | — | — | 3 |
Actuarial (gain)/loss - financial | (22) | (2) | (2) | (1) | (27) |
Actuarial (gain)/loss arising during period | (19) | (2) | (2) | (1) | (24) |
Return on plan assets (greater)/less than discount rate | 12 | — | — | — | 12 |
Remeasurement effects recognised in OCI | (7) | (2) | (2) | (1) | (12) |
Statement of other comprehensive income | |||||
2021 | |||||
Irelanda | Germanya | Francea | Portugala | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Actuarial (gain)/loss - experience | (1) | — | — | — | (1) |
Actuarial (gain)/loss - financial | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Actuarial (gain)/loss arising during period | — | — | — | — | — |
Return on plan assets (greater)/less than discount rate | (6) | — | — | — | (6) |
Remeasurement effects recognised in OCI | (6) | — | — | — | (6) |
Balance sheet | |||||
2022 | |||||
Ireland | Germany | France | Portugal | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Present value of funded liabilities | (43) | — | — | (2) | (45) |
Present value of the unfunded liabilities | — | (9) | (3) | — | (12) |
Present value of total liabilities | (43) | (9) | (3) | (2) | (57) |
Fair value of scheme assets | 47 | — | — | 2 | 49 |
Retirement benefit asset/(liability) | 4 | (9) | (3) | — | (8) |
Balance sheet | |||||
2021 | |||||
Ireland | Germany | France | Portugal | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Present value of funded liabilities | (63) | — | — | (3) | (66) |
Present value of the unfunded liabilities | — | (12) | (4) | — | (16) |
Present value of total liabilities | (63) | (12) | (4) | (3) | (82) |
Fair value of scheme assets | 59 | — | — | 2 | 61 |
Retirement benefit asset/(liability) | (4) | (12) | (4) | (1) | (21) |
Reconciliation of defined benefit asset/liability | |||||
Ireland | Germany | France | Portugal | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Defined benefit asset/(liability) at 1 January 2022 | (4) | (12) | (4) | (1) | (21) |
Current service cost | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
Interest cost on DBO | (1) | 2 | — | — | 1 |
Interest income on assets | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Remeasurement gain recognised in OCI | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
Employer contributions | — | — | — | — | — |
Settlement | — | 2 | — | — | 2 |
Other movements | 1 | (3) | (2) | — | (4) |
Defined benefit asset/(liability) at 31 December 2022 | 4 | (9) | (3) | — | (8) |
Movement in Scheme Assets | |||||
2022 | |||||
Ireland | Germanya | Francea | Portugal | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
At 1 January 2022 | 59 | — | — | 2 | 61 |
Interest income on plan assets | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Return on plan assets greater/(less) than discount rate | (12) | — | — | — | (12) |
Benefits paid – from plan assets | (1) | — | — | — | (1) |
Employer contributions paid | — | — | — | — | — |
At 31 December 2022 | 47 | — | — | 2 | 49 |
Movement in Scheme Liabilities | |||||
2022 | |||||
Ireland | Germanya | Francea | Portugal | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
At 1 January 2022 | (63) | (12) | (4) | (3) | (82) |
Current service cost | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
Interest cost on DBO | (1) | 2 | — | — | 1 |
Actuarial gain/(loss)- experience | (3) | — | — | — | (3) |
Actuarial gain/(loss) - financial | 22 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 27 |
Benefits paid – from plan assets | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
Benefits paid – directly by the Bank | — | 2 | — | — | 2 |
Settlement | — | — | — | — | — |
Other movements | 1 | (3) | (2) | — | (4) |
At 31 December 2022 | (43) | (9) | (3) | (2) | (57) |
Analysis of scheme assets | ||||
2022 | 2021 | |||
Valuea | % of total fair value of scheme assets | Valuea | % of total fair value of scheme assets | |
€m | % | €m | % | |
Equities | 20 | 40% | 26 | 43% |
Bonds | 18 | 36% | 22 | 36% |
Property | 2 | 4% | 2 | 3% |
Mixed Investment Fundsb | 9 | 19% | 11 | 18% |
Other | — | 1% | — | —% |
Fair value of scheme assets | 49 | 100% | 61 | 100% |
Key financial assumptions | 2022 | 2021 |
% p.a. | % p.a. | |
Discount rate | 3.60% | 1.10% |
Inflation rate (‘CPI’) | 2.25% | 1.75% |
Rate of increase for pension | 2.25% | 1.75% |
Assumed life expectancy | 2022 | 2021 |
Life expectancy at 60 for current pensioners (years) | ||
– Males | 26.7 | 26.6 |
– Females | 29.2 | 29.1 |
Life expectancy at 60 for future pensioners currently aged 40 (years) | ||
– Males | 29.1 | 29.0 |
– Females | 31.3 | 31.2 |
Key financial assumptions | 2022 | 2021 |
% p.a. | % p.a. | |
Discount rate | 3.20% | 0.80% |
Inflation rate (‘CPI’) | 2.25% | 1.75% |
Rate of increase for pension | 2.25% | 1.75% |
Assumed life expectancy | 2022 | 2021 |
Life expectancy at 60 for current pensioners (years) | ||
– Males | 25.2 | 25.1 |
– Females | 28.9 | 28.8 |
Life expectancy at 60 for future pensioners currently aged 40 (years) | ||
– Males | 28.2 | 28.0 |
– Females | 31.2 | 31.1 |
Change in key assumptions | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
(Decrease)/ Increase in defined benefit obligation | (Decrease)/ Increase in defined benefit obligation | |
€m | €m | |
Discount rate | ||
0.50% p.a. increase | (4) | (7) |
Assumed Inflation | ||
0.50% p.a. increase | 5 | 8 |
Summary of interests in unconsolidated structured entities | |||||
Secured financing | Short-term traded interests | Traded derivatives | Other interests | Total | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||||
Assets | |||||
Trading portfolio assets | — | 70 | — | — | 70 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 544 | — | — | 11 | 555 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | — | 313 | — | 313 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | — | — | — | 457 | 457 |
Total assets | 544 | 70 | 313 | 468 | 1,395 |
Liabilities | — | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | — | 329 | — | 329 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||||
Assets | |||||
Trading portfolio assets | — | 11 | — | — | 11 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 792 | — | — | 24 | 816 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | — | 260 | — | 260 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | — | — | — | 403 | 403 |
Total assets | 792 | 11 | 260 | 427 | 1,490 |
Liabilities | — | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | — | 444 | — | 444 |
Nature of interest | |||
Lending | Others | Totala | |
€m | €m | €m | |
As at 31 December 2022 | |||
Assets | |||
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | — | 11 | 11 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 365 | 92 | 457 |
Total on-balance sheet exposures | 365 | 103 | 468 |
Total off-balance sheet notional amounts | 569 | — | 569 |
Maximum exposure to loss | 934 | 103 | 1,037 |
Total assets of the entity | 8,650 | 1,240 | 9,890 |
As at 31 December 2021 | |||
Assets | |||
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | — | 24 | 24 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 324 | 79 | 403 |
Total on-balance sheet exposures | 324 | 103 | 427 |
Total off-balance sheet notional amounts | 255 | — | 255 |
Maximum exposure to loss | 579 | 103 | 682 |
Total assets of the entity | 8,353 | 1,302 | 9,655 |
Liabilities | Equity | Total | ||||||
Subordinated debt | Lease liabilitiesa | Called up share capital | Share premium | Other equity | Other reserve | Retained earnings | ||
€m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Balance as at 1 January 2022 | 3,171 | 58 | 899 | 2,348 | 805 | (196) | 2,043 | 9,128 |
Proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debt | 1,500 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,500 |
Lease liability paid | — | (16) | — | — | — | — | — | (16) |
Other equity instruments coupons paid | — | — | — | — | (48) | — | — | (48) |
Issue of ordinary shares | — | — | — | 625 | — | — | — | 625 |
Total changes from financing cash flows | 1,500 | (16) | — | 625 | (48) | — | — | 2,061 |
Other changes | ||||||||
Interest expense | 65 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 67 |
Interest paid | (57) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (57) |
Other movements | — | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | 37 |
Total liability related other changes | 8 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | 47 |
Total equity related other changes | — | — | — | — | 48 | (75) | 66 | 39 |
Balance as at 31 December 2022 | 4,679 | 81 | 899 | 2,973 | 805 | (271) | 2,109 | 11,275 |
Balance as at 1 January 2021 | 1,061 | 75 | 899 | 1,383 | 565 | (132) | 1,843 | 5,694 |
Proceeds from the issuance of subordinated debt | 2,310 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,310 |
Lease liability paid | — | (16) | — | — | — | — | — | (16) |
Other equity instruments coupons paid | — | — | — | — | (40) | — | — | (40) |
Redemption of subordinated debt | (200) | — | — | — | — | — | (200) | |
Issue of ordinary shares | 965 | 965 | ||||||
Additional Tier 1 issuance | — | — | — | — | 240 | — | — | 240 |
Total changes from financing cash flows | 2,110 | (16) | — | 965 | 200 | — | — | 3,259 |
Other changes | ||||||||
Interest expense | 33 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 35 |
Interest paid | (33) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (33) |
Exchange and other movements | — | (3) | — | — | — | — | — | (3) |
Total liability related other changes | — | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | (1) |
Total equity related other changes | — | — | — | — | 40 | (64) | 200 | 176 |
Balance as at 31 December 2021 | 3,171 | 58 | 899 | 2,348 | 805 | (196) | 2,043 | 9,128 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 10,303 | 13,457 |
Trading portfolio assets | 5,811 | 6,207 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 2,040 | 1,975 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 1,127 | — |
Assets pledged | 19,281 | 21,639 |
Transferred assets | Associated liabilities | Transferred assets | Associated liabilities | |
2022 | 2022 | 2021 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | €m | €m | |
Derivative financial instruments | 10,737 | 10,737 | 14,252 | 14,252 |
Repurchase agreements | 8,006 | 2,293 | 6,831 | 2,794 |
Other | 538 | — | 556 | — |
19,281 | 13,030 | 21,639 | 17,046 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Fair value of securities accepted as collateral | 73,811 | 70,865 |
Of which fair value of securities re-pledged/transferred to others | 50,807 | 51,547 |
Company Name | Registered office | % nominal value held | Principal place of business or incorporation | Nature of business |
Alstertal Consumer Finance 2021-1 DAC | 3rd Floor, Fleming Court, Fleming’s Place, Dublin 4, Ireland | — | Ireland | Special Purpose Vehicle |
Mercurio Mortgage Finance s.r.l | Corso Vercelli 40, 20145, Milan, Italy | — | Italy | Special Purpose Vehicle |
Parent | Fellow subsidiaries | Pension funds | |
€m | €m | €m | |
For the year ended and as at 31 December 2022 | |||
Total income | 371 | 13 | — |
Operating expenses | (5) | (371) | (1) |
Total assets | 8,504 | 4,427 | 3 |
Total liabilities | 16,960 | 5,320 | — |
For the year ended and as at 31 December 2021 | |||
Total income | 333 | 63 | — |
Operating expenses | (7) | (290) | (1) |
Total assets | 13,935 | 3,255 | 4 |
Total liabilities | 17,601 | 3,968 | 1 |
As at 31 December | 2022 | 2021 |
€m | €m | |
Cash collateral and settlement balances | 5,247 | 2,392 |
Loans and advances at amortised cost | 801 | 522 |
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending | 1,764 | 3,228 |
Financial assets at fair value through the income statement | 4,284 | 5,932 |
Derivative financial instruments | 473 | 4,963 |
Other assetsa | 362 | 154 |
Total assets with parents and fellow subsidiaries | 12,931 | 17,191 |
Deposits at amortised cost | 2,477 | 2,580 |
Cash collateral and settlements balances | 4,970 | 1,923 |
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured borrowing | 1,437 | 680 |
Debt securities in issue | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Subordinated liabilities | 4,679 | 3,171 |
Financial liabilities designated at fair value | 6,130 | 7,000 |
Derivative financial instruments | 905 | 4,644 |
Other liabilities | 182 | 73 |
Total liabilities with parents and fellow subsidiaries | 22,280 | 21,571 |
As at 31 December | 2022 | 2021 |
€m | €m | |
Loans | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Undrawn amount or credit cards and/or overdraft facilities | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Deposits | 1.0 | 0.6 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Short-term employee benefits | 11.8 | 11.8 |
Post-employment benefits | 0.4 | 0.3 |
Share-based payments | 3.2 | 4.3 |
Termination benefits | 1.0 | 1.5 |
Other long term benefits | 1.4 | 3.0 |
Total Key Management Personnel remuneration | 17.8 | 20.9 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Emoluments in respect of qualifying services | 3.6 | 3.4 |
Benefits under long term incentive schemes | 1.5 | 2.3 |
Total Directors' remuneration | 5.1 | 5.7 |
2022 | 2021 | |
€m | €m | |
Audit of the Bank's financial statements | 3.3 | 2.9 |
Other services: | ||
Other assurance services | 0.8 | 0.9 |
Tax advisory services | — | — |
Other non-audit services | — | — |
Total Auditor's remunerationa | 4.1 | 3.8 |
2022 | 2021 | |||||
GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Non-derivative financial assets | ||||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | — | 185 | 185 | 122 | 397 | 519 |
Standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments | 6 | 4,774 | 4,780 | 8,377 | 233 | 8,610 |
2022 | 2021 | |||||
GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | |
As at 31 December | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m |
Derivative notional contract amount | ||||||
OTC interest rate derivatives | 253 | 81,488 | 81,741 | 11,236 | 41,150 | 52,386 |
OTC interest rate derivatives cleared by central counterparty | — | 11,166 | 11,166 | — | 3,897 | 3,897 |
Exchange traded interest rate derivatives | — | 17 | 17 | — | — | — |
OTC foreign exchange derivatives | — | 54 | 54 | 7,278 | 62,055 | 69,333 |
Other derivatives | — | 1,326 | 1,326 | — | 1,249 | 1,249 |
Derivative notional contract amount | 253 | 94,051 | 94,304 | 18,514 | 108,351 | 126,865 |
With appropriate fallback clause | Without appropriate fallback clause | ||||||
GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | ||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Non-derivative financial assets | |||||||
Loans and advances at amortised cost | — | 185 | 185 | — | — | — | |
Standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments | 6 | 4,564 | 4,570 | — | 210 | 210 |
With appropriate fallback clause | Without appropriate fallback clause | ||||||
GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | GBP LIBOR | USD LIBOR | Total | ||
As at 31 December 2022 | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | €m | |
Derivative notional contract amount | |||||||
OTC interest rate derivatives | 103 | 77,973 | 78,076 | 150 | 3,515 | 3,665 | |
OTC interest rate derivatives - cleared by central counterparty | — | 11,166 | 11,166 | — | — | — | |
Exchange traded interest rate derivatives | — | 17 | 17 | — | — | — | |
OTC foreign exchange derivatives | — | 54 | 54 | — | — | — | |
Other derivatives | — | 772 | 772 | — | 554 | 554 | |
Derivative notional contract amount | 103 | 89,982 | 90,085 | 150 | 4,069 | 4,219 |
ACPR | Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution | CCFOR | Climate Change Financial Risk and Operational Risk Policy |
ALCO | Asset & Liability Committee | CCP | Central Counterparty Clearing |
AMLA | Anti-Money Laundering Authority | CCyB | Countercyclical Capital Buffer |
AT1 | Additional Tier 1 | CDR | Constant Default Rate |
B PLC | Barclays PLC | CDS | Credit Default Swap |
BAC | Board Audit Committee | CEO | Chief Executive Officer |
BaFin | German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority | CET1 | Common Equity Tier 1 |
BAU | Business as Usual | CFO | Chief Financial Officer |
BB PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | CFTC | Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
BBI | Barclays Bank Ireland PLC | CGCCI | Corporate Governance Code for Credit Institutions |
BBI BERC | Barclays Europe Risk Committee | CIB | Corporate and Investment Bank |
BCBS | Basel Committee on Banking Supervision | COO | Chief Operating Officer |
BCI | Barclays Capital International | CPI | Consumer Price Index |
BCSL | Barclays Capital Securities Limited | CPR | Conditional Prepayment Rate |
BNG | Biodiversity net gain | CRC | Climate Risk Committee |
bps | Basis Points | CRCF | Climate Risk Control Forum |
BRC | Board Risk Committee | CRD | Capital Requirements Directive |
Brexit | UK’s withdrawal from the EU | CRMF | Conduct Risk Management Framework |
BRRD | Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive | CRO | Chief Risk Officer |
CA | Comprehensive Assessment | CRR | Capital Requirements Regulation |
CAGR | Compound Annual Growth Rate | CRST | Climate Risk Stress Test |
CBD | Convention on Biological Diversity | CSA | Credit Support Annex |
CBE | Consumer Bank Europe | CToBs | Clearing Terms of Business |
CBI | Central Bank of Ireland | CTRC | Climate Transaction Review Committee |
CC&P | Consumer, Cards and Payments | DBO | Defined Benefit Obligation |
DDoS | Distribute Denial of Service | FVAs | Fair Value Adjustment |
DECL | Disclosures about Expected Credit Losses | FVTPL | Fair Value Through Profit or Loss |
DEI | Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | FX | Foreign Exchange |
DGS | Deposit Guarantee Scheme | GAR | Green Asset Ratio |
DORA | Digital Operational Resilience Act | GDP | Gross Domestic Product |
DSVP | Deferred Share Value Plan | GDPR | General Data Protection Regulation |
EAD | Exposure at Default | GMD | Group Models Database |
EBA | European Banking Authority | GRC | Group Risk Committee |
EC | European Commission | G-SIB | Global systemically important banks |
ECB | European Central Bank | HPI | House Price Index |
ECL | Expected credit losses | HQLA | High Quality Liquid Assets |
EEA | European Economic Area | IAASA | Irish Auditing and Accounting Supervisory Authority |
EIR | Effective Interest Rate | IAS | International Accounting Standard |
EMIR | European Market Infrastructure Regulation | IASB | International Accounting Standards Board |
EONIA | Euro Overnight Index Average | IBOR | Interbank Offered Rates |
ERMF | Enterprise Risk Management Framework | ICA | Investor Compensation Act |
ESEF | Single Electronic Reporting Format | ICAAP | Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process |
ESG | Environmental, Social and Governance | ICS | Investor Compensation Scheme |
ESI | Environmental and Social Impact | IFRICs | International Financial Reporting interpretations |
EU | European Union | IFRS | International Financial Reporting Standard |
EURIBOR | Euro Inter Bank Offered Rate | ILAAP | Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process |
F&P | Fitness and Probity | ILO | International Labour Organisation |
FCA | Financial Conduct Authority | IMM | Internal Model Method |
FRB | Federal Reserve Board | IOSCO | International Organisation of Securities Commissions |
FTR | Funds Transfer Regulation | IPV | Independent price verification |
IRRBB | Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book | SSM | Single Supervisory Mechanism |
ISAs | International Standards on Auditing | PD | Probability of Default |
ISDAs | International Swaps Derivatives Association master agreements | Pillar 2G | Pillar 2 Guidance |
IVU | Independent Validation Unit | Pillar 2R | Pillar 2 Requirements |
JST | Joint Supervisory Team | PRA | Prudential Regulation Authority |
KPIs | Key Performance Indicators | PS | Probabilities of Survival |
LCR | Liquidity Coverage Ratio | PSD2 | Payments Services Directive |
LGD | Loss Given Default | RCF | Revolving credit facility |
LIBOR | London Inter Bank Offered Rate | RemCo | Remuneration Committee |
LTV | Loan to Value | RFRs | Risk-Free Reference Rates |
MAR | Market Abuse Regulation | RNIME | Risks not in model engine |
MFS | Minimum Funding Standard | ROU | Right of use |
MiFID | Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in Europe | RW | Ramsar Wetlands |
MLD5 | 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive | RWAs | Risk weighted assets |
MLD6 | 6th EU AML Directive | S&P | Standard & Poor’s Global |
MREL | Minimum Requirement for own Funds and Eligible Liabilities | SARON | Swiss Average Rate Overnight |
MRGR | Model Risk Governance & Review | SCA | Strong Customer Authentication |
MRM | Model Risk Management | SEC | Securities and Exchange Commission |
MRMQ | Model Risk Measurement and Quantification | SFTR | Securities Financing Transactions Regulation |
NFRD | Non-Financial Reporting Directive | SOFR | Secured Overnight Funding Rate |
NNIs | New Nuclear Installations | SONIA | Sterling Overnight Index Average |
NPPs | Nuclear Power Plants’ | SPPI | Solely payments of principal and interest |
NSFR | Net Stable Funding Ratio | SRB | Single Resolution Board |
O-SII | Other Systemically Important Institution | SREP | Supervisory Review & Evaluation Process |
OTC | Over the Counter | SRF | Single Resolution Fund |
SRMR | Single Resolution Mechanism Regulations | ||
SVP | Share Value Plan | ||
T1 | Tier 1 | ||
TCFD | Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures | ||
TLAC | Total Loss Absorption Capacity | ||
TLTRO | Targeted Longer Term Refinancing Operations | ||
TNFD | Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures | ||
UN | United Nations | ||
UNEP-FI | United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative | ||
VaR | Value at Risk | ||
VCoE | Validation Centre of Excellence | ||
WHS | World Heritage Sites |